The Therapeutic Equivalence of IM and PO Administration of Morphine – 1:3 or 1:6?

1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 64-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Kaiko

When alternating between the intramuscular and oral routes of morphine adminstration, dosage adjust-ments must be made according to differences in rel-ative analgesic potency. While study has shown that six times as much morphine is required orally as intramuscularly to obtain the same total analgesic effect, anecdotal experience suggests that three times as much drug is required orally as is required parenterally. The following examines the arguments both for and against the two approaches to dose adjustment when alterations in route of administration are indicated. There is no compelling reason to change the use of the 1:3 ratio in cancer-related pain. The original experimental ratio of 1:6 is only an apparent inconsistency in that the conditions of dosing and other factors are most likely responsible for this apparent discrepancy. It will only be with a well-controlled study, however, conducted under appropriate conditions, that the 1:3 ratio can be confirmed.

Author(s):  
Ilana Levy ◽  
Samuel Attias ◽  
Lior Cohen ◽  
Nadav Stoppelmann ◽  
Dan Steinberger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Postoperative pain is common in patients hospitalized in surgical departments, yet it is currently not sufficiently controlled by analgesics. Acupuncture, a complementary medical practice, has been evaluated for its benefits in postoperative pain with heterogeneous results. We tested the feasibility of a controlled study comparing the postoperative analgesic effect of acupuncture together with standard-of-care to standard-of-care only. Methods In this pilot non-randomized controlled study conducted at a tertiary medical center in Israel, patients received either acupuncture with standard-of-care pain treatment (acupuncture group) or standard-of-care treatment only (control group) following surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ratings for pain level at rest and in motion were evaluated both at recruitment and two hours after treatment. Acupuncture-related side effects were reported as well. Results We recruited 425 patients; 336 were assigned to the acupuncture group and 89 to the control group. The acupuncture group exhibited a decrease of at least 40% in average level of pain both at rest (1.8±2.4, p<0.0001) and in motion (2.1±2.8, p<0.0001) following acupuncture, whereas the control group exhibited no significant decrease (p=0.92 at rest, p=0.98 in motion). Acupuncture's analgesic effect was even more prominent in reducing moderate to severe pain at baseline (VAS ≥4), with a decrease of 49% and 45% of pain level at rest and in motion respectively (p<0.001), compared with no significant amelioration in the control group (p=0.20 at rest, p=0.12 in motion). No major side effects were reported. Conclusion Integrating acupuncture with standard care may improve pain control in the postoperative setting.


1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Oyama ◽  
Tomoko Isono ◽  
Yasuyuki Suzuki ◽  
Yuki Hayakawa

The anti-nociceptive effect of processed aconiti tuber (TJ-3021), one of the traditional oriental herbal medicines (Kampo), was investigated by utilizing various methods including repeated cold stress and adjuvant articular inflammation in rats and mice. Analgesic potency was compared with that of mesaconitine, a potent component of aconitine alkaloids, and other analgesic agents. It was found that mesaconitine was more potent than morphine, and a processed aconiti tuber [(TJ-3021), Tsumura-shuchi-bushi-matsu] showed some analgesic effect, although it was weaker than those of dichlofenac, aminopyrine and indomethacine.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3556-3556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry Taylor ◽  
Peter Ganly ◽  
Veena Charu ◽  
Joseph DiBenedetto ◽  
Karolyn Kracht ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®; DA) has been shown to be safe and effective for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). The ability to administer darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks (Q3W) (coincident with chemotherapy) would simplify the treatment of CIA. We report results from the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial evaluating efficacy and safety of fixed Q3W administration of an erythropoietic agent. Methods: This study enrolled subjects ≥18 years, diagnosed with anemia (hemoglobin [Hb]&lt;11g/dL) and a nonmyeloid malignancy with ≥12 weeks of planned chemotherapy. Patients (N=391) were randomized 1:1 to receive DA 300 μg or placebo Q3W for 15 weeks. Dose adjustment rules included: increase (to 500 μg Q3W) if Hb concentration was &lt;9 g/dL at week 4 or &lt;10 g/dL (and had &lt;1-g/dL increase) at week 7, or decrease (dependent on previous dose) if Hb concentration was ≥13 g/dL or had ≥1-g/dL increase in any 2-week period. Efficacy was assessed by incidence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and achievement of target Hb of ≥11 g/dL (not exceeding 13 g/dL), consistent with ASH/ASCO, NCCN, EORTC evidence-based practice guidelines. Results: A total of 386 randomized patients were included in the analysis. Demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Mean (SD) Hb levels at baseline were 10.03 (0.86) and 10.05 (0.92) g/dL in the placebo and DA groups, respectively. The most common tumor types were breast (23%), colon (11%), nonsmall-cell-lung cancer (10%), and hematologic malignancies (11%; 8% Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma). The incidence of RBC transfusions from week 5 to the end of treatment phase (EOTP) (the primary endpoint) was significantly lower for the DA group than for the placebo group (P&lt;0.001) (see Table). Hb levels rose steadily in the DA group through approximately week 9, increasing by a mean (SD) of 1.08 (1.28) g/dL from baseline, and then remained relatively stable (see Figure). The proportion of patients achieving Hb target range from week 5 to EOTP was significantly higher for the DA group than for the placebo group (P&lt;0.001). Dose adjustment rules helped to maintain Hb levels within target range. The safety profile of DA was consistent with that observed in previous studies. Rapid increases in Hb concentration or increases to ≥13 g/dL were not associated with adverse events. Conclusions: Fixed Q3W administration of DA is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of CIA. Summary of Results Placebo Darbepoetin alfa KM = Kaplan-Meier estimate Week 5 to EOTP N=185 N=181 Transfusions, KM (95% CL) (primary endpoint) 41% (34, 49) 24% (18, 30) Achievement of target Hb, KM (95% CL) 48% (41, 56) 82% (76, 88) Week 1 to EOTP N=193 N=193 Transfusions, KM (95% CL) 47% (40, 54) 30% (23, 36) Median time to target Hb, weeks (95% CL) 12 (9, 16) 6 (3, 7) Figure Figure


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich J. Spreng ◽  
Vegard Dahl ◽  
Johan Ræder

AbstractBackground and objectivePerioperative low-dose ketamine has been useful for postoperative analgesia. In this study we wanted to assess the analgesic effect and possible side-effects of perioperative low-dose S (+) ketamine when added to a regime of non-opioid multimodal pain prophylaxis.MethodsSeventy-seven patients scheduled for haemorrhoidectomy were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, controlled study. They received oral paracetamol 1–2 g, total intravenous anaesthesia, intravenous 8 mg dexamethasone, 30 mg ketorolac and local infiltration with bupivacaine/epinephrine. Patients randomized to S (+) ketamine received an intravenous bolus dose of 0.35 mg kg−1 S (+) ketamine before start of surgery followed by continuous infusion of 5 μg kg−1 min−1 until 2 min after end of surgery. Patients in the placebo group got isotonic saline (bolus and infusion). BISTM monitoring was used. Pain intensity and side-effects were assessed by blinded nursing staff during PACU stay and by phone 1, 7 and 90 days after surgery.ResultsIn patients randomized to S (+) ketamine emergence from anaesthesia was significantly longer (13.1 min vs. 9.3 min; p < 0.001). BIS values were significantly higher during anaesthesia (maximal value during surgery: 62 vs. 57; p = 0.01) and when opening eyes (81 vs. 70, p < 0.001). Pain scores (NRS and VAS) did not differ significantly between groups.ConclusionsThe addition of perioperative S (+) ketamine for postoperative analgesia after haemorrhoidectomy on top of multimodal non-opioid pain prophylaxis does not seem to be warranted, due to delayed emergence and recovery, more side-effects, altered BIS readings and absence of additive analgesic effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document