Role of the Board Compensation Committee

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 262-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce R. Ellig
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonil Lee ◽  
Sam (Sunghan) Lee ◽  
Kevin J. Murphy ◽  
Peter Oh

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Dayana Mastura Baharudin

Purpose – This study investigates the impact of the three main determinants of strengthening board remuneration through Board Remuneration Committee Composition, Remuneration Composition of Directors and Top Five Senior Management Remuneration compared between pre and post MCCG 2017.Design/methodology/approach – In order to analyze the reporting of Board compensation committee composition, compensation composition of directors and top five Senior Management Remuneration, the research will follow the purposeful technique of sampling followed by descriptive statistic, regression analysis and content analysis obtained from MCCG 2012 and MCCG2017 together with prior research findings.Originality/value – This study is a systematic review of recent research developments in MCCG 2012 and MCCG 2017. The scoring index designed for Board Remuneration Committee Composition, Remuneration Composition of Directors and Top Five Senior Management Remuneration could also be applied to other PLCs other than the Malaysian oil and gas industry.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayishat Omar ◽  
Alex P. Tang ◽  
Yu Cong

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how compensation committee structure or characteristic impacts say on pay (SOP) voting dissent and the impact of SOP dissent on chief executive officer (CEO) turnover. Design/methodology/approach The authors use corporate governance and SOP data to test the relationships amongst variables. Additional analysis is performed using one-to-one propensity-score matched samples. Findings The authors find that firm-years with at least a female member present on the compensation committee are associated with lower SOP dissent. The authors find mixed results of the impact of SOP dissent on CEO turnover. Practical implications This paper suggests that diversity on the compensation committee, particularly the presence of at least a female member on the committee, serves as an important determinant of SOP voting outcome in the USA. The paper provides policymakers and practitioners with insights into factors influencing SOP voting outcomes and implications of SOP dissent for firms. Originality/value The findings of this paper contribute to the corporate governance literature by enhancing the understanding of the role of the compensation committee as it relates to SOP dissent and effect of SOP dissent on CEO turnover.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Hani El-Chaarani ◽  
Zouhour El-Abiad

The aim of this research is to assess the role of the board of directors in determining CEO’s compensation in the context of listed European companies for 3 fiscal years (2016-2017-2018). Based on a sample extracted from 11 European countries (France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, United Kingdom and Netherlands), the results reveal the importance of board of directors characteristics in determining of CEO’s compensation. The board size, CEO duality, the presence of independents directors and the existence of compensation committee have been shown as determinants of CEO’s compensation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document