Updating the Cognitive Performance Scale

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
John N. Morris ◽  
Elizabeth P. Howard ◽  
Knight Steel ◽  
Christopher Perlman ◽  
Brant E. Fries ◽  
...  
Praxis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 505-511
Author(s):  
Daniela Dyntar ◽  
Heike Geschwindner ◽  
Nathan Theill ◽  
Siegfried Negatsch ◽  
Andreas Meier ◽  
...  

Zusammenfassung. Die Stadt Zürich hat ein gut ausgebautes ambulantes Angebot für Menschen mit Demenz. Dieses soll den Zeitpunkt der Institutionalisierung von Demenzkranken in der Stadt hinauszögern können. Anhand des Mini Mental Status (MMS) und der Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) untersucht diese Studie den Schweregrad der Demenz beim Heimeintritt in zwei grossen Pflegezentren der Stadt Zürich in den Jahren 2009, 2010 und 2013. MMS- und CPS-Scores dieser Jahre wurden retrospektiv analysiert (n = 375). Die Resultate zeigen im Jahr 2013 einen höheren mittleren CPS- (M = 2,88 vs. 3,06) und einen tieferen MMS-Wert (M = 15,43 vs. 12,67) als im Jahr 2009, was einem späteren Heimeintritt, also erst in fortgeschrittenen Demenzstadien, entspricht.


1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. M174-M182 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. N. Morris ◽  
B. E. Fries ◽  
D. R. Mehr ◽  
C. Hawes ◽  
C. Phillips ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Susan Gee ◽  
Matthew Croucher ◽  
Gary Cheung

The Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) in the widely used interRAI suite of instruments is of interest to clinicians and policy makers as a potential screening mechanism for detecting dementia. However, there has been little evaluation of the CPS in home care settings. This retrospective diagnostic study included 134 older adults (age ≥ 65) who were discharged from two acute psychogeriatric inpatient units or assessed in two memory clinics. The reference test was a diagnosis of clinical dementia, and the index test was interRAI CPS measured within 90 days of discharge. The overall accuracy of the CPS was good, with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.75–0.89). The optimal cut point was 1/2, coinciding with the recommended cut point, with good sensitivity (0.90, 95% CI = 0.81–0.96) but poor specificity (0.60, 95% CI = 0.46–0.72). Positive predictive value improved from 0.72 (95% CI = 0.66–0.78) to 0.89 (95% CI = 0.75–0.96) when using a cut point of 2/3 instead of 1/2. If the results of the present study are replicated with more generalisable interRAI samples, older adults with a CPS of 3 or above, but without a formal diagnosis of dementia, should be referred for further cognitive assessment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Andersson ◽  
Hao Luo ◽  
Gloria H. Y. Wong ◽  
Terry Y. S. Lum

Background: Bridging scores generated from different cognitive assessment tools is necessary to efficiently track changes in cognition across the continuum of care. This study linked scores from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-5 min (MoCA 5-min) to the interRAI cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), commonly adopted tools in clinical and long-term care settings, respectively.Methods: We included individual-level data from persons who participated in a home- and community-based care program for older people with mild impairment in Hong Kong. The program used the interRAI-Check Up instrument for needs assessment and service matching between 2017 and 2020. Each participant's cognitive performance was assessed using CPS, CPS Version 2 (CPS2), and MoCA 5-min. We performed equipercentile linking with bivariate log-linear smoothing to establish equivalent scores between the two scales.Results: 3,543 participants had valid data on both scales; 66% were female and their average age was 78.9 years (SD = 8.2). The mean scores for MoCA 5-min, CPS, and CPS2 were 18.5 (SD = 5.9), 0.7 (SD = 0.7), and 1.3 (SD = 1.1), respectively. A CPS or CPS2 score of 0 (intact cognition) corresponds to MoCA 5-min scores of 24 and 25, respectively. At the higher end, a CPS score of 3 (moderately impaired) and a CPS2 score of 5 (moderately impaired Level-2) corresponded to MoCA 5-min scores of 0 and 1, respectively. The linking functions revealed the floor and ceiling effects that exist for the different scales, with CPS and CPS2 measuring more-severe cognitive impairment while the MoCA 5-min was better suited to measure mild impairment.Conclusions: We provided score conversions between MoCA 5-min and CPS/CPS2 within a large cohort of Hong Kong older adults with mild physical or cognitive impairment. This enabled continuity in repeated assessment with different tools and improved comparability of cognitive scores generated from different tools from diverse populations and research cohorts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document