Evaluation of Evidence-Based Interventions for the Nurse Coach Scope of Practice Within the Omaha System Guidelines Corpus

2021 ◽  
pp. 089801012110455
Author(s):  
Vickie Bennett ◽  
Mary E. Southard ◽  
Karen A. Monsen
Keyword(s):  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Omaha System ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline ◽  
Evaluation Of Evidence

The purpose of this study was to examine nurse coach scope of practice in relation to existing evidence-based guideline interventions using the Omaha System. The majority of interventions were within scope for nurse coach practice, and problem, category, and target terms showed differential nurse coach practice applicability across interventions. The Omaha System terminology was aligned with nurse coach practice in that both represent and employ comprehensive and holistic perspectives. This study provides a platform for multiple initiatives in nurse coach quality and documentation and provides a methodology for examining the Omaha System guidelines and interventions for other interprofessional roles.

Reducing Hypoglycemia through Increased Knowledge of an Evidence-Based Guideline

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 47-LB
Author(s):  
THAYER A. CLARK ◽  
LEIGH BAK
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline

scholarly journals Do Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus Fulfill the Criteria of Evidence-Based Guideline Development?

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 1872-1882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Nagy ◽  
Joseph Watine ◽  
Peter S Bunting ◽  
Rita Onody ◽  
Wytze P Oosterhuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Therapeutic Guidelines ◽  
Therapeutic Recommendations ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline

Abstract Background: Although the methodological quality of therapeutic guidelines (GLs) has been criticized, little is known regarding the quality of GLs that make diagnostic recommendations. Therefore, we assessed the methodological quality of GLs providing diagnostic recommendations for managing diabetes mellitus (DM) and explored several reasons for differences in quality across these GLs. Methods: After systematic searches of published and electronic resources dated between 1999 and 2007, 26 DM GLs, published in English, were selected and scored for methodological quality using the AGREE Instrument. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the source, scope, length, origin, and date and type of publication of GLs. Using a checklist, we collected laboratory-specific items within GLs thought to be important for interpretation of test results. Results: The 26 diagnostic GLs had significant shortcomings in methodological quality according to the AGREE criteria. GLs from agencies that had clear procedures for GL development, were longer than 50 pages, or were published in electronic databases were of higher quality. Diagnostic GLs contained more preanalytical or analytical information than combined (i.e., diagnostic and therapeutic) recommendations, but the overall quality was not significantly different. The quality of GLs did not show much improvement over the time period investigated. Conclusions: The methodological shortcomings of diagnostic GLs in DM raise questions regarding the validity of recommendations in these documents that may affect their implementation in practice. Our results suggest the need for standardization of GL terminology and for higher-quality, systematically developed recommendations based on explicit guideline development and reporting standards in laboratory medicine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document