The use of process mapping in healthcare quality improvement projects

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Antonacci ◽  
Julie E Reed ◽  
Laura Lennox ◽  
James Barlow

Introduction Process mapping provides insight into systems and processes in which improvement interventions are introduced and is seen as useful in healthcare quality improvement projects. There is little empirical evidence on the use of process mapping in healthcare practice. This study advances understanding of the benefits and success factors of process mapping within quality improvement projects. Methods Eight quality improvement projects were purposively selected from different healthcare settings within the UK’s National Health Service. Data were gathered from multiple data-sources, including interviews exploring participants’ experience of using process mapping in their projects and perceptions of benefits and challenges related to its use. These were analysed using inductive analysis. Results Eight key benefits related to process mapping use were reported by participants (gathering a shared understanding of the reality; identifying improvement opportunities; engaging stakeholders in the project; defining project's objectives; monitoring project progress; learning; increased empathy; simplicity of the method) and five factors related to successful process mapping exercises (simple and appropriate visual representation, information gathered from multiple stakeholders, facilitator’s experience and soft skills, basic training, iterative use of process mapping throughout the project). Conclusions Findings highlight benefits and versatility of process mapping and provide practical suggestions to improve its use in practice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Taylor ◽  
Chiya Shikaislami ◽  
Chris McNicholas ◽  
David Taylor ◽  
Julie Reed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Healthcare teams often consist of geographically dispersed members. Virtual worlds can support immersive, high-quality, multimedia interaction between remote individuals; this study investigated use of virtual worlds to support remote healthcare quality improvement team meetings. Methods Twenty individuals (12 female, aged 25–67 [M = 42.3, SD = 11.8]) from 6 healthcare quality improvement teams conducted collaborative tasks in virtual world or face-to-face settings. Quality of collaborative task performances were measured and questionnaires and interviews were used to record participants’ experiences of conducting the tasks and using the virtual world software. Results Quality of collaborative task outcomes was high in both face-to-face and virtual world settings. Participant interviews elicited advantages for using virtual worlds in healthcare settings, including the ability of the virtual environment to support tools that cannot be represented in equivalent face-to-face meetings, and the potential for virtual world settings to cause improvements in group-dynamics. Reported disadvantages for future virtual world use in healthcare included the difficulty that people with weaker computer skills may experience with using the software. Participants tended to feel absorbed in the collaborative task they conducted within the virtual world, but did not experience the virtual environment as being ‘real’. Conclusions Virtual worlds can provide an effective platform for collaborative meetings in healthcare quality improvement, but provision of support to those with weaker computer skills should be ensured, as should the technical reliability of the virtual world being used. Future research could investigate use of virtual worlds in other healthcare settings.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareth Crisóstomo Portela ◽  
Sheyla Maria Lemos Lima ◽  
Mônica Martins ◽  
Claudia Travassos

Abstract: The development and study of healthcare quality improvement interventions have been reshaped, moving from more intuitive approaches, dominated by biomedical vision and premised on easy transferability, to gradually acknowledge the need for more planning and systematization, with greater incorporation of the social sciences and enhancement of the role of context. Improvement Science has been established, with a conceptual and methodological framework for such studies. Considering the incipient of the debate and scientific production on Improvement Science in Brazil, this article aims to expound its principal conceptual and theoretical fundamentals, focusing on three central themes: the linkage of different disciplines; recognition of the role of context; and the theoretical basis for the design, implementation, and evaluation of interventions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Louise Feather

The application of realist approaches to health services research and evaluation has continued to grow over the past two decades. However, difficulties in defining and operationalising key realist concepts of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes in healthcare settings continue to be recognised within the realist evaluation literature. Reflecting on an ongoing realist evaluation of a healthcare quality improvement programme across an inter-organisational context, this article explores some of the methodological challenges encountered by the author in the early stages of programme theory development. An individualised operationalisation and application of realist concepts are presented to demonstrate how initial programme theories can be developed despite the methodological difficulties presented.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e001104
Author(s):  
Pamela Mathura ◽  
Miriam Li ◽  
Natalie McMurtry ◽  
Narmin Kassam

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Liu ◽  
J. Babigumira ◽  
A. Chiunda ◽  
A. Katamba ◽  
I. Litvak ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Patricia Schroeder ◽  
Lenard L. Parisi ◽  
Rhonda Foster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document