scholarly journals Technology maturity assessment of micro and nano manufacturing processes and process chains

2017 ◽  
Vol 232 (8) ◽  
pp. 1362-1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre C Vella ◽  
Stefan S Dimov ◽  
Roussi Minev ◽  
Emmanuel B Brousseau
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Maturity Assessment ◽  
Process Chains ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies ◽  
The Individual

This article presents a systematic approach for assessing the maturity of manufacturing technologies. A methodology is proposed that is based on modelling the capability of the individual processes and technology interfaces between them. It is inspired by a capability maturity model which has been applied successfully in the field of software engineering. The methodology was developed to assess the maturity levels of individual processes and the combined maturity of pairs or chains of processes. To demonstrate its validity, it was applied for assessing the maturity of technologies in the micro and nano manufacturing domain. The results demonstrated its applicability as a tool for evaluating the maturity of micro and nano manufacturing pairs and their constituent processes. Also, it was shown that the methodology can be employed for identifying process pairs, suitable for integration in process chains, together with their potential weaknesses.

Software and Systems Engineering

2003 ◽  
pp. 26-41
Author(s):  
Rick Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Organizational Cultures ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Significant Point

This chapter will identify the key aspects of software engineering and systems engineering in an effort to highlight areas of consensus and conflict to support current efforts by practitioners and academics in both disciplines in redefining their professions and bodies of knowledge. By using the Software Engineering Institute’s Capability Maturity Model –Integrated (CMMISM) project, which combines best practices from the systems and software engineering disciplines, it can be shown that significant point of agreement and consensus are evident. Nevertheless, valid objections to such integration remain as areas of conflict. This chapter will provide an opportunity for these two communities to resolve unnecessary differences in terminology and methodologies that are reflected in their different perspectives and entrenched in their organizational cultures.

Software Cost Estimation and Capability Maturity Model in Context of Global Software Engineering

2022 ◽  
pp. 910-928
Author(s):  
Ayub Muhammad Latif ◽  
Khalid Muhammad Khan ◽  
Anh Nguyen Duc
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Cost Estimation ◽  
Software Process ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Software Cost Estimation ◽  
Software Cost ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Process Implementation ◽  
Global Software Engineering

Software cost estimation is the process of forecasting the effort needed to develop the software system. Global software engineering (GSE) highlights that software development knows no boundaries and majority of the software products and services are developed today by globally-distributed teams, projects, and companies. The problem of cost estimation gets more complex if the discussion is carried out in the context of GSE, which has its own issues. Temporal, cultural, and geographical distance creates communication and software process implementation issues. Traditional software process models such as capability maturity model (CMM) lacks the dynamism to accommodate the recent trends in GSE. The chapter introduces GSE and discusses various cost estimation techniques and different levels of CMM. A couple of GSE-based case studies having CMM-level projects from multiple organizations are studied to analyze the impacts of highly mature processes on effort, quality, and cycle time.

scholarly journals STUDI TINJAUAN PERBANDINGAN KIPI DAN CMMI SEBAGAI FRAMEWORK STANDAR KEMATANGAN PENGEMBANGAN INDUSTRI PERANGKAT LUNAK DI INDONESIA

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Karouw
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Model Integration ◽  
Capability Maturity Model ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Capability Maturity Model Integration ◽  
Engineering Institute

Model kematangan kemampuan atau Capability Maturity Model adalah salah satu pemicu pengembangan industri telematika, dalam hal standarisasi kemampuan pengembang perangkat lunak. KIPI merupakan suatu standar model kematangan kemampuan yang berlaku di Indonesia. KIPI diserap dari CMMI atau Capability Maturity Model  Integration yang dikeluarkan oleh Software Engineering Institute, SEI, dengan penyesuaian tertentu, menurut karakteristik industri telematika dalam negeri. Studi tinjauan perbandingan KIPI dan CMMI sebagai framework standar kematangan pengembangan industri perangkat lunak ini, memaparkan beberapa perbandingan langsung antara CMMI dan KIPI. Perbandingan KIPI dan CMMI merupakan hal penting untuk memahami keterkaitan setiap area kunci proses dalam setiap tahap kematangan dari masing-masing standar ukuran tersebut. Dengan memahami masing-masing area kunci proses, maka implementasi KIPI akan merupakan salah satu faktor penentu tumbuhkembangnya pengembang perangkat lunak dalam negeri menuju terwujudnya visi bangun industri telematika 2020.Kata Kunci: Model Kematangan, Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, Model Proses, Area Kunci Proses,CMMI, KIPI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document