Global flow visualization of transonic cavity flow with various yaw angles

Author(s):  
Chih-Yung Huang ◽  
Chen-Yen Yeh ◽  
Yun-Fang Lin ◽  
Kung-Ming Chung

This study experimentally investigated transonic cavity flows with different length-to-depth ( L/ h) ratios and yaw angles. Two rectangular models with L/ h = 6.14 and 21.5 were examined with yaw angles of 10°, 30°, and 45° under a flow of Mach 0.83. The flow was visualized using pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) to obtain the detailed pressure distribution inside the cavity models. The acquired PSP data were compared with experimental data measured using Kulite transducers, and these data showed favorable agreement. Gradual pressure increases inside the cavity model with L/ h = 6.14 were observed from the PSP measurements as open cavity flow. The flow impingement at the bottom of the cavity and the significant pressure rise inside the cavity model with L/ h = 21.5 were observed as closed cavity flow. The present study quantitatively visualized the evolution of the pressure distribution from symmetric to asymmetric for different yaw angles using porous PSP sensors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (1185) ◽  
pp. 1185-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. T. Ng

In various studies involving subsonic transition cavity flows, terms like ‘transitional-open’ and ‘transitional-closed’ cavity flow regimes are used in the literature. However, the exact fluid dynamic criteria to distinguish them have not been firmly established. The present work attempts to clarify this. Experiments to measure static pressure and fluctuating pressure distribution in a rectangular cavity with length-to-depth (L/D) ratio of 3 to 20 were performed. Based on pressure measurements on the front, bottom and rear faces of the cavity, additional criteria are established to clearly distinguish the range of criticalL/D(or (L/D)cri) where these different transitional cavity flow regimes occur. The present work ascertains that the (L/D)crifor open and transitional-open cavity flow is 6·0-6·5, for transitional-open and transitional-closed cavity flow is 9-10 and for transitional-closed and closed cavity flow is 14-15. Flow visualisation qualitatively supports the flow pattern in the different cavity flow regimes.


AIAA Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 2462-2470 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Flaherty ◽  
Todd M. Reedy ◽  
Gregory S. Elliott ◽  
J. M. Austin ◽  
Ryan F. Schmit ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document