scholarly journals Doctor in the sky: Medico-legal issues during in-flight emergencies

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Wong

More people are travelling by air and in-flight medical emergencies are becoming more common. Some in-flight emergencies require assistance from passenger doctors who act as good Samaritans in the sky. Their liability and the associated medico-legal issues of providing assistance in mid-flight emergencies are unknown. Although provisions exist in theory about good Samaritans on the ground, it is unclear to what extent these doctrines are applicable to good Samaritans in the sky. This article examines the obligations, liability and legal protection of doctors when acting as good Samaritans in mid-flight emergencies, regardless of their nationalities. It examines the jurisdiction, existing legislations, case law in the United Kingdom and compares with their equivalence in the United States and to some extent, with the legal provisions in France. In addition to in-flight emergencies, this article reviews airlines’ liability for injuries sustained by passengers during flight. It is concluded that doctors’ liability is unclear and uncertain, their legal protection is inadequate and inconsistent; airlines’ liability is restricted by the courts. Reforms proposed include legislative enactment and extension of commercial airliners’ insurance to accord the deficient legal protection.

Author(s):  
Ahdar Rex ◽  
Leigh Ian

This chapter first considers the broad nature of ‘religious freedom’. It then outlines the various systems of constitutional protection for religious liberty in different nations such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and so on, as well as the guarantees in international law for religious rights. Next, it explores the difficult question of how one defines ‘religion’ for the purpose of recognizing religious liberty.


2003 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Hay ◽  
Sam Middlemiss

An organisation will impose appearance codes on their employees that are designed to ensure that they conform to the prevailing organisational culture and present the correct image of the company to external agents. These codes can adversely affect members of a particular sex, sexual orientation or ethnic group, but often there is no legal remedy for them. This article will involve a critical analyse of the extent of the legal protection available for employees that are adversely affected by employers' appearance standards in the United Kingdom and the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document