Legal regulation of property rights to another's property abroad

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze the grounds and procedures of the emergence of property rights to another's property abroad, to identify its interconnectedness and interdependence. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and a synthesis of available scientific and theoretical information. It is includes the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. Such methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, functional, systemic-structural, logical-normative. Results: In business and other economic activities there are situations in which there is a need to use someone else's things or property. This possibility is more often satisfied by means of contract law. However, in some cases, the contract is not a reliable legal remedy to meet the need to use someone else's thing. After all, the contract can be terminated at any time unilaterally and the user of someone else's thing is forced to terminate such use. Therefore, there was a need to invent a more reliable remedy that would ensure the continuous and unhindered use of someone else's property or even property. Such a means was the consolidation of the real right to use someone else's thing. Scientific novelty. In the process of research is established that common characteristics of the institution of limited property rights to another's property abroad is that the subjects of rights to another's property may be those persons who may be subjects of civil rights, first of all, any natural and legal persons. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in legislation and law-enforcement activities.

STATE LIABILITY VIS-À-VIS VICTIMS OF CRIME IN POST-1994 SOUTH AFRICAN CASE LAW – SOMETHING NEW OR A REINVENTED WHEEL?

Since 1994 South African courts have dealt with numerous cases where victims of crime have sued the State for its failure to protect them from criminal violation. This article explores these cases in order to ascertain the juristic nature of this liability and the criteria applied in ascertaining whether said liability exists under given circumstances. The author concludes that the legal remedy granted victims is based on the normal rules of the law of delict. Despite the constant reference by judges to constitutional imperatives, the matter is guided by the normal delictual criteria of reasonableness and public policy which, granted, have to be ascertained in deference to constitutional norms. The essential test has thus not changed since to the inception of the Constitution. Nevertheless, it appears that the courts have drawn fresh impetus from the Constitution in granting the claim of the victim of crime. South African courts have thus far shown opposition to the granting of punitive or constitutional damages to victims of crime though the possibility of the granting thereof in future has not been ruled out unequivocally.

Implementasi Undang – undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2007 Tentang Cukai Terhadap Produk Hasil Pengolahan Tembakau Lainnya Berupa Liquid Personal Vaporizer yang tidak Dilengkapi oleh Pita Cukai

The background of this research is that the determination of Customs collection on Liquid Personal Vaporizer can be concluded that the government has found an answer to the debate that has been happening in Indonesia regarding the prohibition of Personal Vaporizer. As for the formulation of the problem in this research is How the Implementation of “Law No. 39 of 2007” concerning Customs for other tobacco processing products in the form of Liquid Personal Vaporizer, How is the solution or legal remedy in the process of implementing Customs on other tobacco processed products in the form of Liquid Personal Vaporizer which is not equipped with Customs stamps. The type of research in this research is sociological juridical which in other words is a type of sociological legal research and can also be called field research, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what happens in reality in society. While the dataVanalysis technique uses a qualitative descriptive method. The conclusion obtained by the researchers from the results of this research is that although most of them are regulated by ministerial regulations, the application of Customs for HPTL products in the form of Liquid Personal Vaporizers is still based on Law No.39 of 2007 concerning Customs for all regulations related to the application of Customs. And also the legal settlement for Liquid Personal vaporizer that is not equipped with Customs stamps in the Malang Customs Customs KPPBC area using non-penal channels for the settlement.

Perlindungan Hukum bagi Isteri yang Ditelantarkan oleh Suami Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Perdata

Husbands have absolute rights and obligations in building a household. Vice versa, a wife has the same absolute rights and obligations in managing the household. There are still husbands or wifes who are negligent in carrying out their obligations and even do not carry them out. The Method used in this research is the normative legal research method,which is a study that examines a document, namely various secondary data such as statutory regulations, legal theory, court decisions and legal scholar opinions. The case that often occurs is neglect by husbands against theirs own wifes. There are many factors that cause a husband to abandon his wife and even his own family. However, a wife has the right to sue the husband in court by filing a claim for livelihood, which is a legal remedy that the wife can take to get justice.

Hak Isteri terhadap Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan yang Putus Karena Kematian

Inheritance law is very closely related to the scope of human life, because every huma n being drill definiiely experience a legal event called death related to the problem of how to manage and continue rights and obligations ofa person who dies. This siudy aims to identify a wife's rights io joint property in a marriage that has been broken up due to death. The be of research used is a normative legal research method with a siaiuiory approach. Technique of collecting legal serials uses Documeiiiaiion Studies and Literature Studies. Results of windy show that the wife's right to joint property in a marriage that is broken up due to death, namely the wife has a half right to propert y because the property is obtained from results obtained from cooperation carried out by wife and husband who are already bound in marriage from the beginning of marriage to end. my husband has passed array. The legal remedy that can be taken by the wife is litigation, which is the seiilement of disputes in court and now-litigation, namely the senlement of dispWee outside the conn.

Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Hungary

This chapter studies administrative procedure and judicial review in Hungary. Section (1) of Article XXVIII of the Basic Law of Hungary (the Constitution of 2011) regulates the right to a fair trial reproducing the text almost word-for-word as found in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Consequently, anyone effected by an administrative measure has the (constitutional) right to judicial review. Section (7) guarantees the right to legal remedy against decisions of the courts, the public administration, or other authorities that infringe their rights or demonstrable interests. The two regulations are effective even separately, but their combined effect is that the judicial review of administrative action is an incontestable constitutional right. Administrative courts decide on the legality of the administrative action from the point of view of substantive and procedural administrative law, the judicial review is regulated by Act I of 2017 on the Code on Judicial Review of Administrative Actions, while a lawsuit for damages is heard by the ordinary court in a civil law procedure regulated by Act CXXX of 2016 of the Code of Civil Judicial Procedures.

Rejection of Accident Insurance Claims by Insurance Companies

Insurance is a form of compensation for the occurrence of uncertain risks and the delegation of responsibility to bear those risks. The event of this risk is uncertain because it depends on uncertainty. The transfer of risk is carried out by making an insurance agreement or insurance agreement. The first party is usually referred to as the insured. The second is the party willing to accept the risk of the first party by accepting a payment called a premium. Risk takers are often referred to as insurance companies. The research method used in this study uses a legal approach research method (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Based on the results of this study, the researcher states that the basis or cause of the rejection of an insurance agreement is because the insurance agreement is a conditional agreement, where the insurer only bears the loss suffered by the insured party following the terms of the event that resulted in the loss to the insured as agreed, by the parties in the insurance agreement. Or the insured party does not carry out its obligations to pay premiums to the insurer. The legal remedy that the insured party can take if the insurer rejects the claim is to file a lawsuit at the local District Court, as regulated in Article 23 of Law no. 8 of 1999. It can be completed through the BMAI institution.Keywords: Insurance, Claim, Dispute Resolution.

A büntetőeljárás fő céljának érvényesülése a semmisségi panasz- és a felülvizsgálati eljárásban

The main goal of the ciminal procedure is the truth, and within this reaching substantive justice. In the first Code of Criminal Procedure of Hungary (Act No. XXXIII. of 1896), this was essential, too. Looking back at Ferenc Finkey, this study looks into whether substantive justice is available in the proceedings for legal remedy. It examines two remedies: the proceeding on complaint of nullity (in Act No. XXXIII. of 1896), and judicial review (in Act No. XC of 2017).

Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Korea Selatan)

Pengujian keputusan pejabat publik di Indonesia yang selama ini menjadi kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) seharusnya dapat dilakukan melalui mekanisme pengaduan konstitusional (constitutional complaint) yang ditambahkan dalam kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (MKRI). Hal ini disebabkan semua pejabat publik berpotensi untuk melakukan perbuatan yang melanggar atau merugikan hak-hak konstitusional warga negara yang dijamin dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Penambahan kewenangan untuk menguji dan memutus perkara pengaduan konstitusional ini seharusnya dimungkinkan dalam rangka menjalankan fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai pengawal konstitusi sebagaimana diimplementasikan pada negara-negara yang menerapkan prinsip supremasi konstitusi, salah satunya adalah sebagaimana yang diterapkan dalam Mahkamah Konstitusi Korea Selatan. Sekalipun Korea Selatan memiliki peradilan administrasi yang juga memiliki kewenangan untuk melakukan pengujian keputusan pejabat publik, namun Korea Selatan masih membuka ruang bagi warga negaranya untuk melakukan pengaduan konstitusional di Mahkamah Konstitusi Korea manakala terdapat keputusan pejabat publik yang dinilai merugikan dan melanggar hak konstitusional warga negara yang telah dijamin dalam konstitusi. Dengan demikian, manakala seluruh upaya hukum (legal remedy) atas pelanggaran hak konstitusional akibat dikeluarkannya suatu keputusan pejabat publik, telah dilakukan (exhausted), namun pelanggaran tetap terjadi, maka adanya mekanisme pengaduan konstitusional menjadi kebutuhan untuk memberikan perlindungan yang maksimum atas hak konstitusional warga negara. Oleh karenanya, penambahan kewenangan untuk mengadili dan memutus perkara pengaduan konstitusional itupun juga tidak dapat dipisahkan dari kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi.