Explanations of Individual-Group Performance Differences

1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark F. Stasson ◽  
Scott D. Bradshaw
2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Libby ◽  
Linda Thorne

ABSTRACT: Modern manufacturing settings increasingly rely upon workgroups; however, evidence concerning the best fit among incentive structure, production environment, and group performance has been mixed. Young et al. (1993) examine the effect of group incentives on group performance in cooperative and noncooperative environments. Although theory and evidence from practice indicate that group incentives combined with cooperation should result in higher group performance, their results were contrary to this prediction. To further explore this issue, we examine the effect of individual, group, and mixed incentive structures on group performance in assembly lines and teams. We find no difference in group performance depending on incentive structure for assembly lines; however, group performance is higher under group incentives for teams. Supplemental analysis indicates group incentives support the teams’ ability to implement beneficial task strategies and although mixed incentives are theoretically appealing, they may send confusing signals to employees about where to direct their effort.


1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary T. Brownell ◽  
Daryl F. Mellard ◽  
Donald D. Deshler

Despite a lack of empirical support, students with learning disabilities are frequently characterized as having poor transfer abilities. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the learning and transfer ability of 20 students with learning disabilities (LD) and 20 students with matched low achievement (LA). The two groups were assessed on one learning task and three transfer tasks under unassisted and assisted conditions (i.e., dynamic assessment). A 2 (Group) by 4 (Session) (i.e., pretest, training, maintenance/transfer, and delayed maintenance) mixed, factorial design was employed for data collection. Seven separate analyses and several post-hoc analyses were conducted to determine group performance differences on measures of learning, transfer, and maintenance. Results indicated inconsistent performance differences. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of previous research employing dynamic assessment as well as investigations of problem-solving in students with LD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 2400-2410
Author(s):  
Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa ◽  
Itziar Benito-Sánchez ◽  
Montserrat Alegret ◽  
Anna Gailhajanet ◽  
Esther Landa Torre ◽  
...  

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare Basque and Catalan bilinguals' performance on the letter verbal fluency test and determine whether significant differences are present depending on the letters used and the language of administration. Method The sample consisted of 87 Spanish monolinguals, 139 Basque bilinguals, and 130 Catalan bilinguals from Spain. Participants completed the letter verbal fluency test using the letters F, A, S, M, R, P, and E. Results Bilinguals scored higher on the letter verbal fluency test when they were tested in Spanish than in Basque or Catalan. No performance differences were found according to native language or dialects within Basque participants. Catalans with Spanish as their native language scored lower on the letter F compared to those who grew up speaking Catalan and Spanish. The suggested letters to use with Basque speakers are A, E, and B; the suggested letters to use with Catalan speakers are P, F, and M; and the suggested letters to use with Spanish speakers are M, R, and P. Conclusion Selecting appropriate stimuli depending on the language of testing is the first crucial step to assess verbal fluency and thus possible frontal lobe functioning impairment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 640-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Lo Coco ◽  
Salvatore Gullo ◽  
Gabriele Profita ◽  
Chiara Pazzagli ◽  
Claudia Mazzeschi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document