The Implications of Raising One's Voice in Educational Leadership Doctoral Programs: Women's Stories of Fear, Retaliation, and Silence

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Rapp ◽  
X Silent ◽  
Y Silent
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs ◽  
Women's Stories

We wanted to understand if and how educational leadership students are encouraged to address patriarchy in their doctoral programs. More specifically, we wanted to more fully understand why women may choose to avoid issues of gender injustice in their coursework and dissertations. We interviewed four women who are currently enrolled in educational leadership programs and hold positions of leadership in public schools in Ohio.

scholarly journals Educational Leadership Doctoral Faculty Academic Qualifications and Practitioner Experiences in Georgia

10.28945/4179 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 085-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Tolman ◽  
Juliann S McBrayer ◽  
Deborah Evans
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
The United States ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs ◽  
The Future ◽  
Academic Qualifications

Aim/Purpose: This study examined doctoral faculty of educational leadership within the state of Georgia in the United States. The aim was to illustrate the academic qualifications and practitioner experiences of the faculty that develop students in educational leadership programs to be scholarly practitioners and future educational leaders. Background: Faculty of educational leadership programs prepare their students to hold imminent senior leadership roles in P-12 school administration and higher education administration. In this apprenticeship model, doctoral faculty utilize their academic qualifications and/or practitioner experiences to develop students into scholarly practitioners. Methodology: A descriptive quantitative study utilizing content analysis was conducted to examine faculty of doctoral programs in educational leadership (n=83). True to this methodology, the inquiry of this study sought to better understand the academic qualifications and practitioner experiences of doctoral faculty in the field of educational leadership. Contribution: This study serves as a primer for faculty and researchers to visualize the doctoral faculty of educational leadership programs. It can serve as a catalyst to encourage empirical studies of educational leadership faculty and their effectiveness in preparing scholarly practitioners. Findings: Key findings included that nearly 2/3 of the faculty have their terminal degrees from a Research 1 institution, 3/5 hold a PhD, and 3/4 have practitioner experience in their respective field. Recommendations for Practitioners: Doctoral programs should examine the diversity of the academic qualifications and practitioner experiences of their faculty and develop strategies to enhance their programs with these complimenting skill sets. Recommendation for Researchers: Descriptive studies effectively “dip our toe” into a new area of inquiry. Considerations for future research includes examining student perceptions of their faculty who hold either a PhD or Ed.D, as well as those who are academics versus practitioners to better understand their effectiveness. Impact on Society: True to the work of John Dewey, education serves as the vehicle to promote a democratic society. Recognizing these doctoral faculty are preparing the future leaders of education, understanding the experiences of faculty will allow for better insight into those who are ultimately shaping the future of education. Future Research: Future research should focus on empirical studies that explore the effectiveness of faculty based on their academic qualifications and practitioner experiences through the lens of student perceptions.

Utilizing Qualitative Research Methods in Doctoral Programs to Enhance the Importance of Social Justice in Educational Leadership

2022 ◽  
pp. 145-158
Author(s):  
Tricia J. Stewart ◽  
John Caruso Jr. ◽  
Lesley Anne Hellman
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Qualitative Research Methods ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Doctor Of Education ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs

The Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) degree prepares individuals in research and professional practice in education. In the case of Doctor of Education programs that have a focus on leadership, candidates are expected to act as agents of educational and social change. This chapter turns a critical lens to educational leadership programs in two states, Connecticut and Ohio, in order to better understand the current state of qualitative research and social justice within Doctor of Education programs. Additionally, mission, visions, and educational websites were examined to assess the range of experiences around social justice offered in educational leadership programs. This work also explores the literature on qualitative research methods as a form of inquiry and the history and evolution of qualitative methods that makes this research paradigm a good fit for social justice research and activities within educational leadership programs. Lastly, it illustrates practical approaches to embedding social justice in qualitative research courses.

Accelerating Character Education Learning Through a Networked Approach: Insights From the Kern Partners for Character and Educational Leadership

2021 ◽  
pp. 002205742110269
Author(s):  
Ariel Tichnor-Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Character Education ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Improvement Science ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs ◽  
Science Activities

This article explores the utility of networked improvement communities (NICs) as an organizing structure for scaling character education across educational leadership programs through a case study of one network committed to integrating character education across varied institutions and contexts. In examining the improvement science process that guided NIC members’ development and implementation of character education approaches and their perceptions of and participation in NIC activities, this case study offers insights on the promise of structured collaboration across diverse institutions. Furthermore, it identifies the need for NICs to differentiate improvement science activities based on participants’ institutional readiness for character education.

What 21st Century Students Want

2016 ◽  
pp. 1877-1891
Author(s):  
Lesley F. Leach ◽  
Pam Winn ◽  
Susan Erwin ◽  
Liza P. Benedict
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
The United States ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Leadership Program ◽  
Doctoral Level ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Educational Leadership Program ◽  
Course Delivery Methods

Enrollment numbers in graduate Educational Leadership programs are dwindling in many public higher education institutions across the United States. At the same time, for-profit institutions and institutions with private marketing partnerships have experienced increasingly greater enrollments. In this article, the authors present survey results of graduate students in Educational Leadership programs (N=100) to determine the factors that motivate students to select a particular graduate Educational Leadership program. Results suggest that Master's and doctoral-level students primarily select an Educational Leadership program based on the course delivery methods (with hybrid courses most preferred) and the convenience that the program offers in terms of scheduling and location.

Prepared to Lead: Educational Leadership Graduates as Catalysts for Social Justice Praxis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene O. Guillaume ◽  
Magdalena S. Saiz ◽  
Adam García Amador
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Educational Leaders ◽  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs ◽  
Academic Knowledge ◽  
Diverse Student ◽  
Critical Leadership

Situated within PK-12 school settings is the most diverse student population this nation has seen. Concern regarding the preparedness of those at the forefront of education bestows the task to educational leadership programs of developing leaders ready to address social justice issues. This study highlights how graduates from one educational leadership program relied on their academic knowledge and applied critical leadership to operationalize social justice praxis. Utilizing a phenomenological approach, 10 semi-structured interviews revealed three themes. Findings suggest educational leadership programs reflect their mission of social justice values through their curriculum to prepare educational leaders for sustainable change.

Using Cohorts as a Means for Developing Transformational Leaders

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Basom ◽  
Diane Yerkes ◽  
Cynthia Norris ◽  
Bruce Barnett
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Transformational Leaders ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs

The practice of using cohorts in educational leadership programs is examined from conceptual and practical viewpoints. Suggestions for developing cohorts are followed by discussion of the effects of cohorts on students, faculty, educational programs, and systems. Lastly, this paper takes a look at the potential of using the cohort concept as a vehicle for the development of transformational leaders.

Quality and Impact of Educational Leadership Programs: A National Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 3-16
Author(s):  
Jianping Shen ◽  
Van E. Cooley ◽  
Connie D. Ruhl-Smith ◽  
Nanette M. Keiser
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
National Study ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs

Neoliberalism and Western accreditation in the Middle East

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Romanowski
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Leadership Programs ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Educational Leadership Programs ◽  
Educational Leadership Constituent Council ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Elcc Standards ◽  
The One ◽  
Floating Signifiers

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of neoliberalism and the accreditation of educational leadership programs in one Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) country by contextualizing the accreditation process and closely examining the Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) standards used by NCATE, now CAEP, to accredit educational leadership programs in the GCC. By using Habermas’ knowledge constitutive interests (KCIs) and evoking notions of floating signifiers, the paper develops an understanding of the use of Western-developed standards in a country that is different than the one in which these standards were conceived and how the discourse of accreditation standards shapes understandings and meanings of educational leadership. Design/methodology/approach A critical discourse analysis of the ELCC standards is conducted using a two-prong strategy that applies Habermas’ KCIs and evoking the notions of floating signifiers as a theoretical framework. Findings Understanding that knowledge is bounded by cultural circumstances, findings indicate that the ELCC standards contain all three KCIs, and various floating signifiers are embedded within the ELCC discourse that are problematic in a culture that is vastly different than the one in which these standards were conceived. Originality/value There are a few, if any, studies that have examined neoliberalism and accreditation in a GCC country. In particular, there are no studies that have examined the ELCC standards being used outside the USA. The research provides educators with an insight into the different forms of knowledge and understanding of the surplus of meaning of various concepts that are used within the ELCC professional standards outside the country where the standards were conceived without due regard for contextualization. The study provides discussion on how the discourse of the ELCC standards shapes understandings and meanings of educational leadership and educational leaders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document