Safety of Antithymocyte Globulin in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation With Livers From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 981-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret R. Jorgenson ◽  
Jillian L. Descourouez ◽  
Daniel C Felix ◽  
Bret M. Hanlon ◽  
Glen E. Leverson ◽  
...  

Background: Studies suggest that rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (rATG) decreases biliary complications (BCs) after donation-after-circulatory-death-donor liver transplantation (DCD LTx), but safety data are lacking. Objective: Our aim was to assess the safety of rATG for this indication. The secondary end point was efficacy of rATG for this indication. Methods: Adult recipients of DCD LTx were divided into 2 cohorts: protocolized use of rATG in the modern era (July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016) and a historical control without rATG (January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2013). Incidence of infection, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were compared for the safety assessment, incidence of BCs, ischemic cholangiopathy (IC), and transplant outcomes for the efficacy assessment. Results: A total of 83 patients met inclusion criteria: 42 in the historical cohort and 41 in the modern cohort. The modern cohort had significantly fewer bacterial infections at 3 months (historical 54.8% vs modern 23%; P = 0.004) and 1 year (historical 62.1% vs modern 34.2%, P = 0.004). The modern cohort also had fewer fungal infections at these time points (historical 33.3% and 47.9% vs modern 15% and 15%; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in platelet or white blood cell reduction between groups. There was a nonsignificant, but numerical, trend toward reduced IC/BC in the modern cohort at 1 year (IC: historical 30.1% vs modern 13.2%, P = 0.08; BC: historical 51% vs modern 37.5%, P = 0.13). There was no difference in graft/patient survival. Conclusion and Relevance: Our data suggest no major safety issues with rATG in DCD LTx. Our study should ease clinical apprehension surrounding rATG use for this indication. Future prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the role of rATG and its impact on efficacy end points.

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. West

Anesthesiologists have clearly established their place in the history of medical ethics. Our involvement goes back to 1966 when Henri Beecher published his landmark paper on research and informed consent. Participation in the ethics of transplantation is no less important than our previous work. Organ transplant has been life saving for many but also has given rise to many misunderstandings not just from the public but also among our own colleagues. These include methods of allocation and donation, the role that affluence may play in receiving an organ, the definition of death and donation after circulatory death. As perioperative physicians and important members of the transplant team, anesthesiologists are expected to participate in all aspects of care including ethical judgments. This article discusses some of the issues that seem to cause the most confusion and angst for those of us involved in both liver transplantation and in the procurement of organs. It will discuss the definition of death, donation after circulatory death, the anesthesiologists’ role on the selection committee, living donor liver transplantation, and transplantation of patients with alcohol-related liver disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Lazzeri ◽  
Manuela Bonizzoli ◽  
Fabio Marra ◽  
Paolo Muiesan ◽  
Davide Ghinolfi ◽  
...  

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnny C. Hong ◽  
Robert Venick ◽  
Hasan Yersiz ◽  
Prawat Kositamongkol ◽  
Fady M. Kaldas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 272 (5) ◽  
pp. 759-765
Author(s):  
Matteo Mueller ◽  
Marit Kalisvaart ◽  
Joanne O‘Rourke ◽  
Shishir Shetty ◽  
Alessandro Parente ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (03) ◽  
pp. 256-263
Author(s):  
Kristopher P. Croome

AbstractDonation after circulatory death (DCD) donors represent a potential means to help address the disparity between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) and the availability of donor livers. While initial enthusiasm for DCD LT was high in the early 2000s, early reports of high rates of biliary complications and inferior graft survival resulted in reluctance among many transplant centers to use DCD liver grafts. As with all innovations in transplant practice, there is undoubtedly a learning curve associated with the optimal utilization of liver grafts from DCD donors. More contemporary data has demonstrated that results with DCD LT are improving and the number of DCD LT performed annually has been steadily increasing. In this concise review, potential mechanisms of injury for DCD livers are discussed along with strategies that have been employed in clinical practice to improve DCD LT outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document