An Examination of the Relation Between Functional Behavior Assessment and Selected Intervention Strategies With School-Based Teams

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrance M. Scott ◽  
Julianna McIntyre ◽  
Carl Liaupsin ◽  
C. Michael Nelson ◽  
Maureen Conroy ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia L. Walker ◽  
Martha E. Snell

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of workshops and coaching on paraprofessional implementation of function-based interventions. The results of indirect and direct functional behavior assessment guided the development of intervention strategies for three students with autism and intellectual disability. Following intervention, students’ appropriate behavior increased and challenging behavior decreased. In general, paraprofessionals implemented strategies with high levels of fidelity and judged both the coaching and workshop training procedures and student intervention strategies as socially valid. Implications for practice, limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed.


Author(s):  
Brad A. Dufrene ◽  
M. P. Lundy

Function-based interventions may be more effective than interventions based on topography of behavior for improving students’ classroom behavior. A functional behavior assessment (FBA) identifies contextual variables that are associated with or have a functional relation with challenging behaviors. This chapter discusses the essential elements of an FBA, including types of FBA procedures, procedural guidelines form implementing a school-based FBA, and conducting FBAs in the context of school-based consultation. Finally, case examples of FBAs are provided to demonstrate the process of implementation in academic settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teryn P. Bruni ◽  
Daniel Drevon ◽  
Michael Hixson ◽  
Robert Wyse ◽  
Samantha Corcoran ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda J. Bassingthwaite ◽  
Jessica E. Graber ◽  
Adam D. Weaver ◽  
David P. Wacker ◽  
Denise White-Staecker ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally M. Barton-Arwood ◽  
Joseph H. Wehby ◽  
Philip L. Gunter ◽  
Kathleen L. Lane

This study evaluated the intrarater reliability of two functional behavior assessment rating scales: the Motivation Assessment Scale and the Problem Behavior Questionnaire. Teachers rated 30 students from 10 self-contained classrooms for students with emotional or behavioral disorders on three separate occasions using both rating scales. Pearson correlation coefficients and exact and adjacent agreement percentages indicated variable and inconsistent ratings across administrations and rating scales. The authors discuss possible reasons for inconsistencies, as well as implications for practice and future research.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrance M. Scott ◽  
Justin T. Cooper

While functional behavior assessment (FBA) has been a part of special education law and embedded in Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) since 1997, a precise definition of what actions or processes constitute a legal FBA has never been adequately addressed in the law. This article provides an overview of the underlying logic of FBA leading to effective function-based intervention. When focusing on a simplification of the logic behind FBA, there are three big ideas that serve as a foundation for considering the intersection of effectiveness and practicality: function matters, FBA requires repeated observations of behavior, and the only purpose of an FBA is to develop an effective intervention. These big ideas are discussed, leading to a conclusion as to how logic and simplicity must share priority in the process.


2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Shriver ◽  
Cynthia M. Anderson ◽  
Briley Proctor

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Watinee Opartkiattikul ◽  
Michael Arthur-Kelly ◽  
Ian Dempsey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document