scholarly journals Doctor when can I drive? A systematic review and meta-analysis of return to driving after total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002199802
Author(s):  
Purva V Patel ◽  
Vasileios P Giannoudis ◽  
Samantha Palma ◽  
Stephen P Guy ◽  
Jeya Palan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Driving Time ◽  
Bias Risk ◽  
Complex Skill

Background/Objective: Advice given to patients on driving resumption after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is inconsistent. Due to a lack of clear guidelines, surgeons’ recommendations range between 4–8 weeks after surgery to resume driving. Delays in driving return can have detrimental social and economic impact. However, it is important to ensure patients only resume driving once safe. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of driving simulation studies after THA to establish when patients can safely return to driving postoperatively. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion, data was extracted, and studies assessed for bias risk. Review Manager, was used for statistical analysis. Values for brake reaction time (BRT) were included for meta-analysis. Results: 14 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 7 measured BRT and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled means of both right and left THA showed BRT around or above preoperative baseline at 1 week, 2 weeks and 3 weeks, and below baseline at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 32 weeks and 52 weeks. Of these, the pooled means at 6, 32, and 52 weeks were significant ( p < 0.05). Studies not meeting meta-analysis inclusion criteria were included in a qualitative analysis, examining self-reported postoperative driving return times which ranged from 6 days to over a year or in rare cases, never. Majority of patients ( n = 960) self-reported driving return within approximately 6 weeks (pooling of mean values 32.9 days). Conclusions: The mean return to driving time recommended in the literature was 4.5 weeks. Based upon BRT meta-analysis, a return to baseline braking performance was noted at 6 weeks postoperatively. However, driving is a complex skill, and patient recommendation should be individualised based on factors such as vehicle transmission type, THA technique, surgical side, medication and comorbidities.

scholarly journals Resumption of Driving after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purva Patel ◽  
Samantha Palma ◽  
Jeya Palan ◽  
Hemant Pandit ◽  
Bernard Van Duren
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Orthopedic Surgeons ◽  
Driving Time ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Crucial Part

Background/Objective:   The advice given to patients on resumption of driving after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is inconsistent. Due to a lack of clear guidelines, surgeons make recommendations in the range of waiting 4 to 8 weeks after surgery to resume driving. Driving is a crucial part of daily life thus, withholding driving longer than necessary can have a detrimental social and economic impact on the patient. However, it is equally important to ensure that patients only resume driving once safe. This study presents a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of simulation studies to establish when it is safe for patients to return to driving after hip arthroplasty.    Methods:   The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched to June 2020 for studies examining ‘return to driving’ or ‘brake reaction time’ after ‘total hip arthroplasty’. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion, data was extracted, and studies were assessed for risk of bias. Review Manager, Version 5.4 was used for statistical analysis.     Results:   A total of 14 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 7 measured brake reaction time and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled means of both right and left THA show a brake reaction time (BRT) around or just above baseline at 1 week, 2 weeks and 3 weeks, and below baseline at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 32 weeks and 52 weeks. Of these, the pooled means at 6, 32, and 52 weeks were significant (p < 0.05).    Conclusion:   The mean recommended return to driving time was 4.5 weeks. Based upon the meta-analysis of BRT, it appears that it is safe to return to driving at 6 weeks post operatively. Orthopedic surgeons should use these results as a guideline when advising patients on when to resume driving. 

Efficacy of NSAIDs versus radiotherapy for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002199111
Author(s):  
Jacob Shapira ◽  
Mitchell J Yelton ◽  
Jeffery W Chen ◽  
Philip J Rosinsky ◽  
David R Maldonado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Randomised Control Trials ◽  
Risk Patients

Background: The aims of this systematic review were: (1) to investigate the prophylactic effect of radiotherapy (RT) and NSAIDs in high-risk patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA); and (2) to compare the efficacy of non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs in preventing post-THA HO, utilising a meta-analysis of randomised control studies. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles regarding HO following THA in March 2019. Studies were included if they contained data regarding HO incidence after THA or contained data regarding HO prophylaxis comparison of NSAIDs and/or RT in terms of dosage or duration. Results: 24 studies reported on populations that were not at high-risk for HO. These studies reported between 47.3% and 90.4% of their patient populations had no HO formation; between 2.8% and 52.7% had mild formation; and between 0.0% and 10.4% had severe formation. A total of 13 studies reported on populations at high-risk for HO. Studies analysing RT in high-risk patients reported between 28.6% and 97.4% of patients developed no HO formation; between 1.9% and 66.7% developed mild HO formation; and between 0.0% and 11.9% developed severe HO formation. Studies analysing NSAID treatment among high-risk populations reported between 76.6% and 88.9% had no HO formation; between 11.1% and 23.4% had mild HO formation, and between 0.0% and 1.8% had severe HO formation. 9 studies were identified as randomised control trials and subsequently used for meta-analysis. The relative risk for COX-II in developing any HO after THA was not significantly different compared to non-selective NSAIDs (RR 1.00; CI, 0.801–1.256; p = 0.489). Conclusions: NSAIDs prophylaxis for HO may have better efficacy than RT in high-risk patients following THA. Non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs have comparable efficacy in preventing HO. Factors such as medical comorbidities and side-effect profile should dictate the prophylaxis recommendation.

scholarly journals Total hip arthroplasty after a previous pelvic osteotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Shigemura ◽  
Y. Yamamoto ◽  
Y. Murata ◽  
T. Sato ◽  
R. Tsuchiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pelvic Osteotomy ◽  
Total Hip

Does robotic-assisted surgery improve outcomes of total hip arthroplasty compared to manual technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2021-141135
Author(s):  
Vishal Kumar ◽  
Sandeep Patel ◽  
Vishnu Baburaj ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Rajnish ◽  
Sameer Aggarwal
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Limb Length ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Total Hip

BackgroundRobot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an emerging technology that claims to position implants with very high accuracy. However, there is currently limited data in literature on whether this improved accuracy leads to better long-term clinical outcomes. This systematic review compares the outcomes of THA done with the help of robotic assistance (RA) to those done with conventional manual techniques (MTs).MethodsFour electronic databases were searched for eligible articles that directly compared robot-assisted THA to manual THA and had data on the radiological or clinical outcomes of both. Data on various outcome parameters were collected. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with 95% CIs.ResultsA total of 17 articles were found eligible for inclusion, and 3600 cases were analysed. Mean operating time in the RA group was significantly longer than in the MT group. RA resulted in significantly more acetabular cups being placed inside Lewinnek’s and Callanan’s safe zones (p<0.001) and had significantly reduced limb length discrepancy compared with MT. There were no statistically significant differences in the two groups in terms of incidence of perioperative complications, need for revision surgery and long-term functional outcome.ConclusionRA leads to highly accurate implant placement and leads to significantly reduced limb length discrepancies. However, the authors do not recommend robot-assisted techniques for routine THAs due to lack of adequate long-term follow-up data, prolonged surgical times and no significant differences in the rate of complications and implant survivorship compared with conventional MTs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document