scholarly journals Blood Loss and Visibility with Esmolol vs Labetalol in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117955061984799
Author(s):  
Philip F Lavere ◽  
Nikunj A Rana ◽  
Michael P Kinsky ◽  
J Sean Funston ◽  
Sharif S Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Double Blind

Objectives: Improved intraoperative visibility during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) decreases the risk of serious orbital or skull base injuries. Esmolol and labetalol have been used to reduce bleeding and achieve better visibility, but it remains unclear which drug is more effective. This study aims to measure visibility scores and mucosal bleeding rates for esmolol and labetalol in FESS. Methods: This is a 1-year randomized double-blind trial of adults undergoing FESS at a tertiary academic center. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age 18 or older; history of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with or without nasal polyps; undergoing FESS for CRS; and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 (healthy) or 2 (patient with mild systemic disease). The exclusion criteria were as follows: pregnancy; asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bradycardia, heart failure, end-stage renal disease, cerebrovascular accident, diabetes mellitus; preoperative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin, or beta-blockers; and body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2. Patients received either dose-infused esmolol or intravenous push labetalol. The primary outcome was intraoperative visibility determined by surgeon using validated scoring systems (Boezaart, Wormald). The secondary outcome was hemodynamic control (rate of blood loss, average mean arterial pressure [MAP], average heart rate [HR]). Hypothesis of no difference between drugs formed before data collection. Results: Of the 32 adults given drug (mean age = 50), 28 patients (13 esmolol and 15 labetalol) with complete data were included in the final analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between esmolol and labetalol in rate of blood loss (0.59 [0.28] vs 0.66 [0.37] mL/min, P = 0.62), average MAP (79.7 [7.5] vs 79.4 [7.7] mm Hg, P = .93), HR (72 [8.7] vs 68 [11.7] bpm, P = .26), or mean visibility scores for the Boezaart (3.1 [0.69] vs 3.1 [0.89], P = .85) and Wormald (6.1 [1.7] vs 5.9 [1.9], P = .72) grading scales. Conclusions: There were no significant differences between esmolol and labetalol in rate of blood loss, MAP control, HR, or surgical visibility in FESS. Either drug may be used, and other considerations (availability, cost) can dictate choice.

scholarly journals Metoprolol Significantly Improves Visual Clarity and Hemodynamic Parameters during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Sadek ◽  
Mokhtar Mostafa ◽  
Tarek Abdel-Monem
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Surgical Field ◽  
Group 2

Background and Objectives: The success of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) depends on the visual clarity of the surgical field, which is understudied. Controlled hypotension has many advantages for FESS including reduction in blood loss and improved quality of the surgical field. This study determined whether the use of β-blockers as a premedication could improve the operative field in FESS. Methods: Sixty patients aged from 18 to 50 years, undergoing septoplasty and FESS were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either metoprolol (100 mg, group 1) or a placebo (a vitamin tablet, group 2) 60 min before surgery. Results: The average blood loss and surgery duration were not significantly higher in the placebo group. The surgical field was graded using the Fromme-Boezaart scale, and it was significantly clearer (p < 0.001) in metoprolol group. The mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lower in the metoprolol group after 30 min of induction until the end of surgery (p < 0.001). The heart rate was also significantly lower (p < 0.001) in those who received metoprolol from before induction of anesthesia up to the end of surgery. Conclusion: Metoprolol significantly improves visual clarity and hemodynamics during FESS. We would recommend the use of metoprolol in FESS and septoplasty.

Intravenous Esmolol Infusion Improves Surgical Fields during Sevoflurane-Anesthetized Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. e208-e211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping-Hung Shen ◽  
Erik Kent Weitzel ◽  
Jen-Tsung Lai ◽  
Peter-John Wormald ◽  
Chee-Sang Ho
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Constant Infusion ◽  
Saline Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
The Impact

Background There is increasing evidence to support the use of anesthetics to affect operative fields during endoscopic sinus surgery and thus the speed, thoroughness, and safety of the surgery itself. Previous research has suggested preoperative beta-blockers improve surgical fields (SFs); our study is novel in showing the impact of a beta-blocker infusion on SFs during sinus surgery. Methods A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 40 patients. Patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis received a constant infusion of i.v. esmolol or saline in addition to a standard inhaled anesthetic protocol. At regular 15-minutes intervals, the quality of SF, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were assessed. Total blood loss was also recorded. Results Average vital sign parameters (HR/SBP/DBP) were significantly lower in the esmolol group (69.1/90.2/55.1 versus 77.2/99.5/63.5; p < 0.01). The esmolol infusion improved SFs relative to control (2.3 versus 2.6; p = 0.045). Esmolol infusion resulted in good SFs (grades 1 and 2) more often than poor fields (grades 3 and 4); on the contrary, the control group showed more poor than good SFs (chi-square; p = 0.04). A correlation between increasing HR and worsening SFs was identified (r = 0.259; p = 0.002). The control group had significantly higher average blood loss (1.3 versus 0.8 mL/min; p = 0.037). Conclusion Esmolol-induced relative hypotension and bradycardia during endoscopic sinus surgery achieves significantly improved SFs relative to saline control.

scholarly journals The Effect of Pterygopalatine Fossa Block (PPFB) during Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS) on Intraoperative Bleeding: A Randomized Control Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Deepak Paudel ◽  
S.T. Chettri ◽  
S.P. Shah ◽  
B.P. Shah ◽  
S. Manandhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Randomized Control Trial ◽  
Pterygopalatine Fossa ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Block Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Randomized Control

Background: Bleeding is the frequent intraoperative complication in most of the surgeries and remains a challenge for the surgeons and anesthesiologists. Major blood loss during FESS is rare but even a small amount of bleeding disturbs the endoscopic surgery field, increases the likelihood of complications, lengthens the time of surgery and results in incomplete surgery. The greater palatine canal (GPC) local injection is used to limit posterior bleeding during sinus surgery. Objective: To study the effect of pterygopalatine fossa block on intraoperative bleeding and operative field optimization during endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: Prospective double blind randomized control trial. Thirty six patients were recruited in the study who also acted as their own control. PPFB was done only on one side of the nostril and the side was randomized by the lottery; neither the patient nor the operating surgeons were aware of the laterality. Boezaart score was used to quantify the intra-operative blood loss. Results: Blood loss between block group and non-block group was compared. Patients in block group had more stable hemodynamics with no fluctuations, better visibility of the surgical field and decreased blood loss as compared with non-block group. Conclusion: Greater palatine fossa block is a useful adjunct in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. It provided more stable hemodynamics, good operative conditions by lowering blood loss.

Evaluating the Role of Anesthesia on Intraoperative Blood Loss and Visibility during Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 194589242198915
Author(s):  
David C. Moffatt ◽  
Robert A. McQuitty ◽  
Alex E. Wright ◽  
Tawanda S. Kamucheka ◽  
Ali L. Haider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Total Blood Loss ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Previous studies and meta analyses have led to incongruent and incomplete results respectively when total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia (IA) are compared in endoscopic sinus surgeries in regards to intraoperative bleeding and visibility. Objective To perform a more comprehensive meta-analysis on randomized controlled trial (RCTs) comparing TIVA with IA in endoscopic sinus surgery to evaluate their effects on intraoperative bleeding and visibility. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing TIVA and IA in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis was completed in May 2020. Utilizing databases, articles were systematically screened for analysis and 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. The primary outcome included intraoperative visibility scores combining Boezaart, Wormald and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included rate of blood loss (mL/kg/min), estimated total blood loss (mL), Boezaart, Wormald scores, VAS, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Results 19 RCTs with 1,010 patients were analyzed. TIVA had a significantly lower intraoperative bleeding score indicating better endoscopic visibility (Boezaart, VAS, and Wormald) than IA (−0.514, p = 0.020). IA had a significantly higher average rate of blood loss than TIVA by 0.563 mL/kg/min (p = 0.016). Estimated total blood loss was significantly lower in TIVA than IA (−0.853 mL, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences between TIVA and IA in the mean heart rate (−0.225, p = 0.63) and MAP values (−0.126, p = 0.634). The subgroup analyses revealed no significant difference between TIVA and IA when remifentanil was not utilized and whenever desflurane was the IA agent. Conclusion TIVA seemed to have superior intraoperative visibility scores and blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery when compared to IA. However, the results are not consistent when stratifying the results based on the use of remifentanil and different inhaled anesthetics. Therefore, the conclusion cannot be made that one approach is superior to the other.

Bioabsorbable dressing impregnated with betamethasone and ciprofloxacin after endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132110624
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Wierzchowska ◽  
Paulina Kalińczak-Górna ◽  
Błażej Grześkowiak ◽  
Kamil Radajewski ◽  
Jakub Burduk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Nasal Packing ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Nasal Surgery ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Nasal Blockage ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Mucosal Edema

Background In addition to its hemostatic and stabilization role, biodegradable nasal packing can be used as a carrier for drugs after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The aim of this study was to compare the influence of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) soaked with ciprofloxacin, or betamethasone, or both to the same foam soaked with saline after FESS. Methods 120 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis, with and without polyps, directed for bilateral full-house FESS were enrolled for the study. The patients were randomized and blinded into 3 groups, depending on the type of postoperative procedure applied. Thus, NasoPore soaked with antibiotic was provided to the first group; in the second group, the steroid was used; and the combination of both, in the third group. In each case, the aforementioned procedure was administered on one side of the nose, while NasoPore was soaked in saline on the other, at the end of the surgery, respectively. The patients were requested to complete a questionnaire during their postoperative visits at 2, 10, 30, 90, and 180 days, scoring the level of complaints on the VAS scale, separately for each side. The evaluation of the healing process was performed at each visit using rigid endoscopy and subsequently rated on numerical scales. Results Decreased mucosal edema and secretion; reduced Lund-Kennedy score; and favorable influences on facial pressure, nasal blockage, and smell were most evidently seen in the group receiving the antibioticsteroid combination. Conclusions The application of biodegradable nasal packing with betamethasone and ciprofloxacin in sino-nasal surgery has positive effects not only on the healing process but also impacts patient’s comfort. To optimize it, however, further research is needed.

Propofol for maintenance of general anesthesia: A technique to limit blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery

1993 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith E. Blackwell ◽  
Douglas A. Ross ◽  
Patricia Kapur ◽  
Thomas C. Calcaterra
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery

scholarly journals Controlled Hypotension for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparative study of Dexmedetomidine and Esmolol

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-49
Author(s):  
Md Shafiul Alam Shaheen ◽  
AKM Nurnobi Chowdhury ◽  
Kawsar Sardar ◽  
Mushfiqur Rahman ◽  
Sudhangshu Shekhar Biswas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Controlled Hypotension ◽  
Fentanyl Consumption ◽  
Surgical Field ◽  
Group D

Background: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) requires effective control of bleeding for better visibility of the operating field and reduced risk of injury to the optic nerve or the internal carotid artery. Controlled hypotension is a technique used to limit intraoperative blood loss to provide the best possible field for surgery. Objectives: Our study is undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as a hypotensive agent in comparison to esmolol in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). Methods: Sixty (60) patients 20 – 50 years of age, ASA I/II scheduled for FESS were randomly assigned to two equal groups of 30 patients each. Patients of group D received dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg over 10 min before induction of anesthesia followed by 0.4 – 0.8 µg/kg/hr infusion during maintenance and group E received esmolol loading dose 1mg/kg was infused over one min followed by 0.4 – 0.8 mg/kg/hr infusion during maintenance to maintain mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between (55 – 65 mmHg). The surgical field was assessed using Average Category Scale and average blood loss was calculated. Hemodynamic variables (MAP, HR); intraoperative fentanyl consumption and total recovery from anesthesia (Aldrete’s score ≥9) were recorded. Sedation score was determined at 10, 20, 30, 40 & 60 min after tracheal extubation and time to first analgesic demand was also recorded. Results:In both group D and group E reached the desired MAP (55–65 mmHg) with no inter group difference in MAP or HR. Mean intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in group D than group E. Recovery time to achieved Aldrete’s score ≥9 were significantly lower in group E compared with group D.The sedation score were significantly lower in group E compared with group D at 10 minutes, 20 minutes and 30 minutes postoperatively. Time to first analgesic demand was significantly longer in group D. Conclusion: The result of this study showed that both dexmedetomidine and esmolol can be used as agents for controlled hypotension and are effective in providing ideal surgical field during FESS. But dexmedetomidine offers the advantage of inherent analgesic, sedative and anesthetic sparing effect. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; April 2018; 24(1): 37-49

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document