scholarly journals Development of a Pediatric PICC Team Under an Existing Sedation Service: A 5-Year Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955651988404
Author(s):  
Shane C Rainey ◽  
Girish Deshpande ◽  
Haley Boehm ◽  
Kim Camp ◽  
Annette Fehr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pediatric Sedation ◽  
Line Infection

Objective: To examine our institutional experiences with ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheter (US-PICC) placement by a dedicated US-PICC team under the umbrella of an existing pediatric sedation service. Methods: Retrospective review of quality data examining 968 US-PICC encounters over a 5-year period from 2012 to 2016. Data for each encounter included line indications, success rate, dwelling time, need for sedation, and incidence of complications including venous thrombosis, infection, and accidental removal. Results: US-PICC lines were successfully placed in 89% of patients with an average age of 5.4 years. Extended antibiotic treatment was the most common indication for US-PICC placement and the mean dwell time was 23 days. Long-term complications were noted in 6.1% of cases, with venous thrombosis and line infection complicating 1.7% and 0.9% of encounters, respectively. Conclusion: Results suggest that our endeavor of creating a dedicated US-PICC team under an existing pediatric sedation service is successful with regard to the number of lines placed, success rates, and incidence of complications. This approach may be beneficial to other institutions seeing to maximize resource utilization and streamline patient care.

scholarly journals Comparison of different techniques for the management of venous steno-occlusive lesions during placement of peripherally inserted central catheter

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Jin Yang ◽  
Danbee Kang ◽  
Ji Hoon Shin ◽  
Eun Ho Jang ◽  
Seung Yeon Noh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Alternative Pathway ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Initial Attempt ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Occlusive Lesion

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate strategies for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in patients with venous steno-occlusive lesion (VSOL). We performed a retrospective cohort study in adults with central or peripheral VSOL who underwent PICC placement procedures from January 2015 to December 2018. Four different strategies [selecting alternative pathway/over the wire (SAP/OTW), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), re-puncture in ipsilateral arm (RIA), and catheter placement in the contralateral arm (CICA)] were analyzed and we compared the clinical outcomes by strategy and compared the strategy between central and peripheral VSOLs. During 4 years, 258 PICC procedures performed in patients with VSOLs, 100 PICC were included in the analysis. The overall technical success rate of initial attempt with SAP/OTW was 32.2%. As a second-line technique, PTA was most frequently used in both central (100%) and peripheral (68.2%) VSOL groups. The clinical success rates within 2 months of SAP/OTW, PTA, RIA, CICA were 55.2%, 43.2%, 14.3%, and 33.3%, respectively (P = 0.24). In conclusion, when the SAP/OTW failed, the PTA can be preferred as a second-line technique for both central and peripheral VSOLs. When guidewire passage fails, the operator could adopt the RIA or CICA technique as an alternative method.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1495-1506
Author(s):  
Brent Burbridge ◽  
Hyun Lim ◽  
Lynn Dwernychuk ◽  
Ha Le ◽  
Tehmina Asif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Access Device ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Venous Access Device

Introduction: Venous access is a crucial element in chemotherapy delivery. It remains unclear whether cancer patients prefer a port to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Our study aimed to assess cancer patients’ satisfaction with their venous access device and to compare the quality of life (QoL) of subjects with a PICC to those with a port. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, EORTC QLQ-C30, and a locally developed quality of life survey (QLAVD), designed to assess satisfaction with venous access devices, were administered to breast or colorectal cancer patients over a one-year period following the device insertion. Mixed effects models were used to assess changes on mean scores at different time points. Results: A total of 101 patients were recruited over a three-year period, (PICC group, n = 50; port group, n = 51). Survey response rates for months one and three were 72% and 48%, respectively. Overall, no significant differences were noted between the two groups in relation to EORTC QOL. At three months, the mean pain scores were 3.5 ± 2.3 for the port and 1.3 ± 0.75 for PICC (<0.001). The mean score for a negative effect of the venous access device on psychosocial well-being was 6.0 ± 4.1 for PICC and 3.0 ± 2.7 for the port (p = 0.005). Complications related to PICCs occurred in 38% patients versus 41% with a port (p > 0.24). Conclusions: Although subjects with a port experienced more pain during the device insertion or access for chemotherapy, it had a smaller negative impact on psychosocial scores than the PICC. No significant differences in complications rates were observed between the two devices.

scholarly journals Improving peripherally inserted central catheter appropriateness and reducing device-related complications: a quasiexperimental study in 52 Michigan hospitals

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjqs-2021-013015
Author(s):  
Vineet Chopra ◽  
Megan O'Malley ◽  
Jennifer Horowitz ◽  
Qisu Zhang ◽  
Elizabeth McLaughlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Line ◽  
Hospital Performance ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Change Point Analysis ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Appropriateness Criteria ◽  
Mean Frequency ◽  
The Mean

BackgroundThe Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC) provides evidence-based criteria for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) use. Whether implementing MAGIC improves PICC appropriateness and reduces complications is unknown.MethodsA quasiexperimental study design to implement MAGIC in 52 Michigan hospitals was used. Data were collected from medical records by trained abstractors. Hospital performance on three appropriateness criteria was measured: short-term PICC use (≤5 days), use of multilumen PICCs and PICC placement in patients with chronic kidney disease. PICC appropriateness and device complications preintervention (January 2013 to December 2016) versus postintervention (January 2017 to January 2020) were compared. Change-point analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on device appropriateness. Logistic regression and Poisson models were fit to assess the association between appropriateness and complications (composite of catheter occlusion, venous thromboembolism (VTE) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI)).ResultsAmong 38 592 PICCs, median catheter dwell ranged from 8 to 56 days. During the preintervention period, the mean frequency of appropriate PICC use was 31.9% and the mean frequency of complications was 14.7%. Following the intervention, PICC appropriateness increased to 49.0% (absolute difference 17.1%, p<0.001) while complications decreased to 10.7% (absolute difference 4.0%, p=0.001). Compared with patients with inappropriate PICC placement, appropriate PICC use was associated with a significantly lower odds of complications (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.34), including decreases in occlusion (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.29), CLABSI (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.81) and VTE (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.47, all p<0.01). Patients with appropriate PICC placement had lower rate of complications than those with inappropriate PICC use (incidence rate ratio 0.987, 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99, p<0.001).ConclusionsImplementation of MAGIC in Michigan hospitals was associated with improved PICC appropriateness and fewer complications. These findings have important quality, safety and policy implications for hospitals, patients and payors.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Lines in the Behavioral Health Client: A Perspective

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-156
Author(s):  
Vera Deacon ◽  
Susan Oliver
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Hyperosmolar Solutions ◽  
Central Catheters ◽  
Indications For Use

Abstract Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are used in many different patient populations. The indications for use vary and include infusions of hyperalimentation, chemotherapeutic agents, hyperosmolar solutions, antibiotics, or long-term rehydration. However, on occasion, there are clients who do not fit the typical criteria for PICC insertion. This includes, but is not limited to, those individuals who are receiving frequent intravenous (IV) “sticks” or even short-term infusions of irritating drugs. The behavioral health client is one who may not be the typical PICC or IV patient but who may benefit from the placement of a PICC for certain treatment modalities.

Catheter-related deep venous thrombosis in children with hemophilia

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 1727-1731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna M. Journeycake ◽  
Charles T. Quinn ◽  
Kim L. Miller ◽  
Joy L. Zajac ◽  
George R. Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Radiographic Evidence ◽  
Catheter Dysfunction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Clinical Problems

Abstract Central venous catheters (CVCs) are a common adjunct to hemophilia therapy, but the risk of CVC-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in hemophiliacs is not well defined. In a previous study, 13 patients with CVCs had no radiographic evidence of DVT. However, recent abstracts and case studies demonstrate that DVT does occur. Therefore, this study sought to determine the frequency of DVT in children with hemophilia and long-term CVCs and to correlate venographic findings with clinical features. All hemophilia patients with tunneled subclavian CVCs in place for 12 months or more were candidates for evaluation. Patients were examined for physical signs of DVT and questioned about catheter dysfunction. Contrast venograms were obtained to identify DVT. Fifteen boys with severe hemophilia were evaluated, including 9 from the initially studied group of 13. Eight patients had evidence of DVT, 5 of whom previously had normal venograms. Five of 15 patients had clinical problems related to the CVC, all of whom had DVT. Four of 15 patients had suggestive physical signs; 3 had DVT. The mean duration of catheter placement for all patients was 57.5 months (range, 12-102 months). For patients with DVT, the mean duration was 66.6 ± 7.5 months, compared to 49.5 ± 7.2 months for patients without DVT (P = .06). No patient whose CVC was in place fewer than 48 months had an abnormal venogram. Many hemophilia patients with CVCs develop DVT of the upper venous system, and the risk increases with duration of catheter placement.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Upper Extremity Venous Thrombosis in Oncology Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1759-1763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Luo ◽  
Xiao-mei Jing ◽  
Guo-rong Wang ◽  
Ying Qin ◽  
Hai-xin Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Oncology Patients

Real-time ultrasound-guided placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheter without fluoroscopy

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soshi Nakamuta ◽  
Toshihiro Nishizawa ◽  
Shiori Matsuhashi ◽  
Arata Shimizu ◽  
Toshio Uraoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Central Catheters

Background and aim: Malposition of peripherally inserted central catheters placed at the bedside is a well-recognized phenomenon. We report the success rate of the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters with ultrasound guidance for tip positioning and describe the knacks and pitfalls. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical case charts of 954 patients who received peripherally inserted central catheter procedure. Patient clinical data included success rate of puncture, detection rate of tip malposition with ultrasonography, adjustment rate after X-ray, and success rate of peripherally inserted central catheter placement. Results: The success rate of puncture was 100% (954/954). Detection rate of tip malposition with ultrasonography was 82.1% (78/95). The success rate of ultrasound-guided tip navigation was 98.2% (937/954). The success rate of ultrasound-guided tip location was 98.0% (935/954). Adjustment rate after X-ray was 1.79% (17/952). The final success rate of peripherally inserted central catheter placement was 99.8% (952/954). Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance for puncturing and tip positioning is a promising option for the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. Ultrasound guidance could dispense with radiation exposure and the transfer of patients to the X-ray department.

Severe cutaneous necrotizing vasculitis with postinfectious glomerulonephritis secondary to peripherally inserted central catheter bloodstream infection

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982097078
Author(s):  
Francesco Londrino ◽  
Antonio Granata ◽  
Slave Boiceff ◽  
Massimo Guadagni ◽  
Sara Dominijanni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Term Therapy ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Necrotizing Vasculitis ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Postinfectious Glomerulonephritis ◽  
Long Term Therapy ◽  
Central Catheters

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) are widely used for hospitalized patients particularly in the oncological and hematological field. PICCs are a safe alternative to central venous catheters, mainly for medium- and long-term therapy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document