Serum levels of IL-17A in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis treated with interferon-β

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 885-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodica Bălaşa ◽  
Zoltan Bajko ◽  
Adina Huţanu
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Interleukin 17 ◽  
Interferon Β ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Interleukin-17 (IL-17), which is secreted by Th17 cells, is a proinflammatory cytokine that is implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and plays a role in nonresponse of MS patients to interferon-β (IFN-β) therapy. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to establish a correlation between nonresponders (NR) and IL-17A serum titers and binding antibodies (BAbs) to IFN-β, as well as to find a correlation between IL-17A serum levels and other features of MS patients. Methods: Our prospective study included 72 inactive relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients that had been treated for at least 18 months with IFN-β and 15 healthy subjects. We determined the serum levels of IL-17A and of BAbs. IL-17A levels were considered elevated (IL-17A+) if the recorded value was greater than 1.6 pg/ml. Results: Twenty-seven patients (37.5%) were NR and had a significantly higher serum IL-17A level compared to the responders group. Nineteen patients (26.4%) were IL-17A+ and had had a significantly higher number of relapses in the previous year and a higher Expanded Disability Status Score. The majority of IL-17A+ patients were NR and had a shorter MS duration. Conclusions: RRMS patients with high serum IL-17A levels do not respond well to IFN-β therapy and have shorter MS duration compared to patients with low IL-17A levels. This response is not influenced by the presence of BAbs.

Effect of lateral therapy switches to oral moderate-efficacy drugs in multiple sclerosis: a nationwide cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2020-324869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Due Buron ◽  
Tomas Kalincik ◽  
Finn Sellebjerg ◽  
Per Soelberg Sørensen ◽  
Melinda Magyari
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Dimethyl Fumarate ◽  
Interferon Β ◽  
First Line ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

BackgroundSwitching between first-line disease-modifying therapies in patients with clinically stable relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) due to reasons other than disease activity is frequent, but evidence on the effect of this practice is limited. We investigated the effect of switching patients with stable RRMS on occurrences of disability accumulation, relapses and future treatment discontinuation.MethodsUsing the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, we identified patients with RRMS without disease activity who either (1) stayed on injectable platform therapy (interferon-β or glatiramer acetate) or (2) switched to dimethyl fumarate (DMF) or teriflunomide (TFL) and compared treatment outcomes using propensity-score-based methods and marginal structural models (MSM).ResultsWe included 3206 patients in the study. We found no change in risk of 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale score worsening in patients switching to DMF (HR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.50) or TFL (HR: 1.16, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.46). The risk of suffering any relapse tended to decrease when switching to DMF (HR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.04) and tended to increase when switching to TFL (HR: 1.25, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.63). Absolute risk differences were small. MSM analyses showed similar results but did not find an increased relapse risk in TFL switchers.ConclusionSwitching from injectable platform therapies to oral first-line therapies in patients with clinically stable RRMS does not increase the risk of disability accumulation. While the postswitch risk of relapses trended towards marginally higher on TFL, this trend was eliminated by adjustment for time-variant confounders.

Interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an independent postmarketing study in southern Italy

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Trojano ◽  
Maria Liguori ◽  
Damiano Paolicelli ◽  
Giovanni Bosco Zimatore ◽  
Francesca De Robertis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Year ◽  
Independent Population ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

This independent, population-based surveillance study monitored the efficacy and safety of interferon beta (IFNb) products in 1033 patients with relapsing -remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 15 centres in Italy. Relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and adverse events were evaluated for up to 24 months. Data of patients with a baseline EDSS score 5-3.5 are reported. The proportions of relapse-free patients were similar among the groups at 12 and 24 months (P =0.10). IFNb products produced significant reductio ns from baseline in relapse rates at 12 and 24 months (P B-0.001), with no differences among treatments (P =0.2). There were no significant differences in mean EDSS change among groups at 12 or 24 months. The IFNb-1b group showed a higher incidence of adverse events during the first year of treatment (P B-0.05) than IFNb-1a groups, and more withdrawals (10%) compared with Avonex (5%) at 24 months. IFNb products are equally effective in low disability RRMS, but IFNb-1a may have a more favorable efficacy/tolerability ratio.

Long-term (up to 22 years), open-label, compassionate-use study of glatiramer acetate in relapsing—remitting multiple sclerosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Miller ◽  
Vincent Spada ◽  
Dorothy Beerkircher ◽  
Rivka Riven Kreitman
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Pretreatment Score

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term glatiramer acetate (GA) therapy, 46 patients with relapsing—remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were treated for up to 22 years in an ongoing, open-label study. Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was measured every six months, relapses were reported at occurrence and patients self-reported adverse events (AEs). At GA initiation, disease durations ranged from 0—20 years (median 6.0 years) and at data cut-off (October 2004), GA therapy duration ranged from 1—22 years (median 12.0 years). Mean EDSS score increased 0.9 ± 1.9 from the pretreatment score (3.0 ± 1.8; P = 0.076). Only 10/28 (36%) patients with baseline EDSS <4.0 had a last observed value ≥ 4.0 and 8/34 (24%) with entry EDSS < 6.0 reached EDSS ≥ 6.0. A majority (57%) maintained improved or unchanged EDSS scores. Annualized relapse rate decreased to 0.1 ± 0.2 from 2.9 ± 1.4 prestudy ( P < 0.0001). Of the 18 remaining patients in October 2004 (average disease duration 23 years), 17% with baseline EDSS scores < 4.0 reached EDSS ≥ 4.0 and 28% with baseline scores < 6.0 reached EDSS ≥ 6.0. Adverse events were similar to those reported in short-term clinical trials. This study shows a low rate of relapses and EDSS progression in RRMS patients on GA for up to 22 years. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 494—499. http://msj.sagepub.com

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document