Enhancing motivation and engagement within a PBIS framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 136548022110022
Author(s):  
Michael Petrasek ◽  
Anthony James ◽  
Amity Noltemeyer ◽  
Jennifer Green ◽  
Katelyn Palmer
Keyword(s):  
School Environment ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Motivation And Engagement ◽  
Core Features

A motivating and engaging school environment has been associated with several positive student outcomes. Consequently, schools have an opportunity and responsibility to promote a culture that supports students in developing and maintaining their motivation, engagement, and self-improvement. Efforts to promote such a culture can be embedded within a Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) framework. In this paper, we begin by describing motivation and engagement, and discussing the relevance of these concepts in schools. Next, we introduce the traditional PBIS framework, highlighting research and core features. Third, we propose how PBIS can be enhanced by incorporating a focus on relationships, engagement, and motivation in the school setting. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for school teams seeking to implement this approach.

scholarly journals Involvement and Participation of Students With Severe Disabilities in SWPBIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-141
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Kurth ◽  
Alison L. Zagona
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
General Educators ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tiered System ◽  
Students With Severe Disabilities

With more schools implementing Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) and achieving valued student outcomes associated with these efforts, the inclusion of students with extensive and pervasive support needs (i.e., “severe” disabilities) in this tiered system must be considered. These students remain programmatically and physically separated from general education instruction and activities. Given that SWPBIS is implemented in general education settings and it is designed to support all students, the purpose of this study was to investigate SWPBIS coaches’ perceptions of the involvement of students with extensive support needs in SWPBIS processes and procedures within one state. Findings suggest the coaches believe that students with extensive support needs are physically and programmatically separated from Tier 1 SWPBIS instruction and activities, with few general educators expressing participation in facilitating their involvement. Implications and recommendations for these findings are provided.

scholarly journals Factor Validation of a Fidelity of Implementation Measure for Social Behavior Systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Massar ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Fidelity Of Implementation ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Based ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
School Based Interventions ◽  
Behavior Systems ◽  
Core Features

Assessing fidelity of implementation of school-based interventions is a critical factor in successful implementation and sustainability. The Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) was developed as a comprehensive measure of all three tiers of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) and is intended to measure the extent to which the core features of SWPBIS are implemented with fidelity. The purpose of this study was to assess the extent to which the TFI can be used as one measure of all three tiers, three separate measures of individual tiers, or as a more granular level of fidelity that measures implementation on 10 subscales across the tiers. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the factor structure of the TFI. Results indicate that the TFI is a valid measure of fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS and can be used to measure implementation by subscales, tiers, and as a comprehensive assessment of all three tiers.

Reducing Coercion in Schools

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Horner ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Discipline ◽  
School Level ◽  
The Core ◽  
Whole School ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Punitive Discipline ◽  
Detrimental Impact ◽  
Core Features ◽  
Systems Of Support

The use of punitive discipline systems in schools establishes the foundation of coercive dynamics. Adults all too often establish aversive contingencies that inadvertently prompt and maintain unwanted behavior by students. Three recent themes in addressing school discipline systems include (1) emphasizing reward of desired behavior above punishment of undesired behavior, (2) implementing systems of support at the whole-school level, and (3) introducing a “multitiered” approach to discipline systems that matches the level of support to the need of the student. These three themes are linked within a schoolwide approach labeled “positive behavioral interventions and supports” (PBIS). The chapter presents the core features of School-wide PBIS and describes how those features reduce the detrimental impact of coercive dynamics.

scholarly journals School‐wide implementation of positive behavioral interventions and supports in an alternative school setting: A case study

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1493-1513
Author(s):  
Amy‐Jane Griffiths ◽  
Elena Lilles Diamond ◽  
James Alsip ◽  
Michael Furlong ◽  
Gale Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Alternative School ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions

scholarly journals An Investigation of Concurrent Validity of Fidelity of Implementation Measures at Initial Years of Implementation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Caitlin Rasplica Khoury ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton
Keyword(s):  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Fidelity Of Implementation ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
School Practices ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Self Assessments ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
Fidelity Measures

Fidelity of implementation of school practices is crucial to student outcomes. Several types of tools, including self-assessments, are available for measuring fidelity, but little is known regarding the relation of self-assessments of fidelity to fidelity instruments completed with the support of external experts, specifically, during the first few years of implementation. The present study used cross-sectional data from 1,438 schools to examine relations between fidelity self-assessment and team-based fidelity measures in the first 4 years of implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS). Results showed strong positive correlations between fidelity self-assessments and a team-based measure of fidelity at each year of implementation.

scholarly journals Examining the Relative Utility of PBIS Implementation Fidelity Scores in Relation to Student Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise T. Pas ◽  
Stacy R. Johnson ◽  
Katrina J. Debnam ◽  
Chris S. Hulleman ◽  
Catherine P. Bradshaw
Keyword(s):  
Roc Curve ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Implementation Fidelity ◽  
School Level ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Cut Points ◽  
Cut Point ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Fidelity Measures

There are several widely used Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) implementation fidelity measures, including the Schoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET), but there is limited empirical investigation substantiating the association between specific fidelity cut point scores and student outcomes. This article examined different SET cut points in reference to school-level outcomes across 180 elementary, middle, and high schools participating in randomized trials of PBIS. Specifically, we examined the implementation fidelity achieved in the sample, as well as within each school level (i.e., elementary, middle, and high). Using the binary complier index, we examined the association of each of three SET cut points with behavioral and academic outcomes using t tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Although the t tests did not provide confirmation of one specific cut point, post hoc analyses suggested that the cut point may need to be tailored to school levels. There was moderate convergence between implementation on one scale (i.e., responses to behavioral violations) and academic achievement, based on ROC curve analyses for the 70% and 80% cut points. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Schools: A Tutorial

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Keller-Bell ◽  
Maureen Short
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Systems ◽  
Language Therapy ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavioral Expectations ◽  
Outcomes For Children

Purpose Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) provide a framework for behavioral expectations in school systems for children with and without disabilities. Speech-language pathologists who work in school settings should be familiar with this framework as part of their role in improving the outcomes for children. The purpose of this tutorial is to discuss PBIS and its use in school settings. Method The authors provide an overview of the PBIS framework and focus on its applicability in classroom-based settings. The process of implementing PBIS in classrooms and other settings such as speech-language therapy is discussed. Conclusions This tutorial provides speech-language pathologists with an overview of PBIS and may facilitate their understanding of how to implement PBIS in nonclassroom settings.

Optimal Timing for Launching Installation of Tier 2 and 3 Systems of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072199608
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine patterns in implementation of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) systems to identify timings of installation that led to higher implementation of advanced tiers. Extant data from 776 schools in 27 states reporting on the first 3 years of Tier 2 implementation and 359 schools in 23 states reporting on the first year of Tier 3 implementation were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found that higher Tier 1 implementation predicted subsequent Tier 2 and Tier 3 implementation. In addition, waiting 2 or 3 years after initial Tier 1 implementation to launch Tier 2 systems predicted higher initial Tier 2 implementation (compared with implementing the next year). Finally, we found that launching Tier 3 systems after Tier 2 systems, compared with launching both tiers simultaneously, predicted higher Tier 2 implementation in the second and third year, so long as Tier 3 systems were launched within 3 years of Tier 2 systems. These findings provide empirical guidance for when to launch Tier 2 and 3 systems; however, we emphasize that delays in launching advanced systems should not equate to delays in more intensive supports for students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document