The Relationship of the Child Welfare Officer and the School Medical Officer To the National Health Service

1951 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V. Neale

Broad divisions of preventive and curative medicine can arbitrarily exist, but there should be a wide overlap and increasing effort should be made to bring all our medical forces together in a comprehensive attack upon any factors contrary to mental and physical welfare and health in infancy and childhood. Officers in the maternity and child welfare, and school medical services, will neces sarily need to have a closer and increasing liaison with other forms of preventive and clinical practice. The identity of these officers can be retained (and must be so for some years), but the overall value in the national health service will depend on a wider fusion with consultants, especially obstetricians and pædiatricians, on the one hand, and on the other (especially in health centres) with general practitioners, and particu larly with those comprising the personnel of group general practice. Most especially in the field of child health, preventive and curative activity can proceed hand-in-hand and in fact must do so to maintain fruitful results. Pædiatricians, infant welfare officers, and school medical officers have wide overlaps in their interests and duties ; to some extent a mutual interchange of work in children's hospitals and in welfare departments already exists in several large centres. Clinical area pædia tricians should organize, with the local preventive medicine authorities, arrangements for a comprehensive child health programme in the area and so act as joint influences in promoting the very best co-operative work, and particularly in its educational preventive aspects.

1968 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 33-35

Illicit teenage amphetamine use is a cause for continuing concern in Britain; many have also been worried for a long time by the continuing dependence on these drugs of older members of the community.1 The risks of toxic psychoses and dependence on these drugs, especially amphetamines, dexamphetamines and methyl-amphetamine (Methedrine - BW) are well documented,2 and the Chief Medical Officer of the Ministry of Health has recently drawn the attention of all doctors to the need to avoid the substitution of such substances for cocaine as prescribing of the latter becomes more restricted. Widespread prescribing and the multiplicity of available preparations require retail pharmacists and wholesalers to maintain large supplies, The thefts which largely supply the illicit market are thus made easier. In 1966 3.7 million National Health Service prescriptions were dispensed for some 100 million tablets of amphetamines or substances with similar actions (e.g. phenmetrazine and other appetite suppressants). Not only tablets, but EC 10 prescription forms are stolen and altered or corrupted, especially to obtain amphetamines. This is a danger to which doctors should become particularly alert. Yet amphetamines are potentially hazardous drugs with limited indications. Is there any justfication for prescribing them at all? (Amphetamine-barbiturate mixtures have been discussed in an earlier article.3)


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1950 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-758
Author(s):  
JOHN D. KERSHAW

The Chief Medical Officer of the Ministry of Education, in his latest report,1 deals with the 2 years 1946 and 1947. It is appropriate that this should be so, for the 2 year period is one of special significance during which the full implications of the Education Act of 1944 for School Health work were being realised, while the National Health Service was not yet in operation to take its share of the burden. This latter point had considerable influence, for some local authorities were understandably shy of incurring expense in developing school health activities which might prove unnecessary when the National Health Service came into being.


1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Kushnick

Racism has been and is central to an understanding of the health of black people in Britain. Black people have played and are playing a central role in the National Health Service (NHS). Their role is, however, shaped by racism. Their experiences as consumers of the NHS are also shaped by racism—in terms of their treatment for both physical and mental health problems. In addition, their specific health problems such as sickle cell anemia have not received the attention they deserve. The NHS has become part of the internal control system of the British racist immigration system. The cuts in the NHS, and in other areas of the welfare state, since 1979 have created the conditions for increasing racial conflict on the one hand and for interracial class-based resistance on the other.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1954 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-587
Author(s):  
CHARLES B. GRIEVE ◽  
JAMES M. GILL

THE FIRST communication in this issue is by two general practitioners who have written their views of the British National Health Service as a companion article to the one by Professor John Craig which appeared last month. Dr. Charles B. Grieve, a medical practitioner in Aberdeen, is present Chairman of the Local Medical Committee of Aberdeen and also Vice-Chairman of the Executive Council of Aberdeen. Dr. James M. Gill is a country practitioner in Inverurie, a town in the county of Aberdeenshire; he is Vice-Chairman of the Executive Council of the Counties of Aberdeen and Kincardine. Dr. Craig writes that: "They are both liberal-minded men who have thought a lot about the service and have been taking an active part in its planning." The second communication is a description of private practice in Britain by Dr. Philip Evans, Professor of the Department of Child Health at Guy's Hospital, London. Dr. Evans has translated British medical fees into American dollars but, as noted last month, there is such a difference in the cost of living between the two countries that 2.8 dollars to the pound does not give an accurate picture. On a cost of living basis, the exchange rate is probably nearer 4 than 2.8 dollars to the pound. THERE must be few doctors with experience of general practice among the poor, the working and lower middle classes in the years before the introduction of the National Health Service who would not agree that the medical care of this group was grossly inadequate.


1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Salter

The National Health Service of the United Kingdom is trapped in a policy paradox. On the one hand, the 1990 reforms encourage the devolution of power to local purchaser and provider units through the operation of the “internal market.” On the other, mechanisms of control and accountability are being revamped to produce a centrally managed system bound together by corporate contracts. The political frictions generated by this paradox are exacerbated by the problem of rationing health care in the face of apparently unlimited demand. This article examines the political problems faced by a single Health Authority as it sought to implement the changes required of it by the conflicting policies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document