The Mater Hospital Multiprofessional Care Pathway for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence E McManus ◽  
Anne-Marie Marley ◽  
Joseph C Kidney

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common condition associated with an increasing mortality and morbidity. There are also significant economic implications with hospital admission accounting for the majority of the total COPD health care expenditure. Mild exacerbations of COPD can be treated at home; severe exacerbations require hospitalization. The purpose of this programme of care was to integrate and optimize treatment using current guidelines. Methods: This was a prospective study of management of severe exacerbations of COPD following implementation of a structured care pathway. The project was based at a district general hospital in inner city Belfast. Key measures of improvement were length of hospital stay, readmission rates within one month and hospital mortality. A multidisciplinary care pathway incorporated a score that was developed with one point for each of the following markers of a severe exacerbation: dyspnoea at rest, bed bound, tachypnoea (>25), tachycardia (>110), pyrexia (>38.5), use of accessory muscles of respiration and peripheral oedema. We have called this the ‘Mater COPD score’. The aim was for optimal management, education and identification of appropriate time for discharge. Patient treatment was standardized using oral steroid therapy, nebulized bronchodilators (air cylinders were used to provided nebulization where appropriate) and antibiotic therapy. Results: A total of 85 patients were studied, 40 men with a mean (SEM) age of 68.6 (1.7) years. The mean COPD score on admission was 2.3 (range 0–6). Mean score on discharge was 0.4 (range 0–3). Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were 0.97 and 1.83 L, respectively. Seven patients were readmitted within one month. The mean length of an episode was reduced from 9.4 to 5.5 days, with a national average of 9.7 days at that time. However, delayed discharge in 25 cases (due to co-morbidity, social problems or other factors) resulted in the overall length of stay being reduced to 6.5 days. Continued follow-up using this pathway reduced the length of stay of all admissions with COPD by four days to 5.4 days. Nebulizers were routinely changed from oxygen driven to air driven. There was a 1700% increase in air cylinders used over the two years following introduction. This was associated with a 57% reduction in mortality. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary care pathway in the management of acute exacerbations of COPD ensures optimal treatment for patients and results in a significant reduction in the length of stay and a reduced mortality rate without increasing readmission rates.

Author(s):  
Kulothungan Gunasekaran ◽  
Mudassar Ahmad ◽  
Sana Rehman ◽  
Bright Thilagar ◽  
Kavitha Gopalratnam ◽  
...  

Introduction: More than 15 million adults in the USA have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) places a high burden on the healthcare system. Many hospital admissions are due to an exacerbation, which is suspected to be from a viral cause. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients with a positive and negative respiratory virus panel who were admitted to the hospital with COPD exacerbations. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Geisinger Healthcare System. The dataset included 2729 patient encounters between 1 January 2006 and 30 November 2017. Hospital length of stay was calculated as the discrete number of calendar days a patient was in the hospital. Patient encounters with a positive and negative respiratory virus panel were compared using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables. Results: There were 1626 patients with a total of 2729 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation encounters. Nineteen percent of those encounters (n = 524) had a respiratory virus panel performed during their admission. Among these encounters, 161 (30.7%) had positive results, and 363 (69.3%) had negative results. For encounters with the respiratory virus panel, the mean age was 64.5, 59.5% were female, 98.9% were white, and the mean body mass index was 26.6. Those with a negative respiratory virus panel had a higher median white blood cell count (11.1 vs. 9.9, p = 0.0076). There were no other statistically significant differences in characteristics between the two groups. Respiratory virus panel positive patients had a statistically significant longer hospital length of stay. There were no significant differences with respect to being on mechanical ventilation or ventilation-free days. Conclusion: This study shows that a positive respiratory virus panel is associated with increased length of hospital stay. Early diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation patients with positive viral panel would help identify patients with a longer length of stay.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000733
Author(s):  
Rachel MacDonell ◽  
Orla Woods ◽  
Stephanie Whelan ◽  
Breda Cushen ◽  
Aine Carroll ◽  
...  

IntroductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease that may be punctuated by episodes of worsening symptoms, called exacerbations. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are detrimental to clinical outcomes, reduce patient quality of life and often result in hospitalisation and cost for the health system. Improved diagnosis and management of COPD may reduce the incidence of hospitalisation and death among this population. This scoping review aims to identify improvement interventions designed to standardise the hospital care of patients with AECOPD at presentation, admission and discharge, and/or aim to reduce unnecessary admissions/readmissions.MethodsThe review followed a published protocol based on methodology set out by Arksey and O’Malley and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Electronic database searches for peer-reviewed primary evidence were conducted in Web of Science, EMBASE (Elsevier) and PubMed. Abstract, full-text screening and data extraction were completed independently by a panel of expert reviewers. Data on type of intervention, implementation supports and clinical outcomes were extracted. Findings were grouped by theme and are presented descriptively.Results21 articles met the inclusion criteria. Eight implemented a clinical intervention bundle at admission and/or discharge; six used a multidisciplinary care pathway; five used coordinated case management and two ran a health coaching intervention with patients.ConclusionThe findings indicate that when executed reliably, improvement initiatives are associated with positive outcomes, such as reduction in length of stay, readmissions or use of health resources. Most of the studies reported an improvement in staff compliance with the initiatives and in the patient’s understanding of their disease. Implementation supports varied and included quality improvement methodology, multidisciplinary team engagement, staff education and development of written or in-person delivery of patient information. Consideration of the implementation strategy and methods of support will be necessary to enhance the likelihood of success in any future intervention.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 254-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob D Goddard ◽  
Shelly A McNeil ◽  
Kathryn L Slayter ◽  
R Andrew McIvor

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mean time to next exacerbation in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) before and after the implementation of standing orders.SETTING: Tertiary care hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.POPULATION STUDIED: The records of 150 patients were analyzed, 76 were in the preimplementation group, 74 in the postimplementation group.INTERVENTION: The management and outcomes of patients admitted with an acute exacerbation of COPD before and after the implementation of standing orders were compared.DESIGN: A retrospective chart review.MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean time to next exacerbation between treatment groups (preimplementation group: 310 days, postimplementation group: 289 days, P=0.53). Antibiotics were used in 90% of the cases (preimplementation group: 87%, postimplementation group: 93%). The postimplementation group had a 20% increase in the use of first-line agents over the preimplementation group. Overall, first-line agents represented only 37% of the antibiotic courses.CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of standing orders encouraged the use of first-line agents but did not influence subsequent symptom resolution, length of hospital stay, or the infection-free interval in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document