CSII from patient to politics; a national and local perspective

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah J Wake ◽  
Liz Mackay ◽  
Alan Jaap ◽  
Mark W J Strachan ◽  
John A McKnight

Continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin (CSII), or insulin pump therapy, is increasingly recognised as an important treatment option for type 1 diabetes. In the UK, however, patient usage remains low, owing in part to the politics surrounding funding. In this article, current CSII use in Scotland is discussed and the evidence base and cost effectiveness of the therapy, with respect to biochemical parameters and quality of life reviewed. The guidance on CSII use from national organisations (Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) is also presented. There is strong support for CSII among patients, and personal patient stories are included to highlight the potential impact of CSII on everyday life. Finally, we discuss our local strategy for recruiting and commencing pump therapy and the local and national challenges faced. As CSII use increases, it is important that all doctors, nurses and allied health professionals have an awareness of what it is and how it works. Patients need ongoing support to best manage their health and health professionals should ensure that the most appropriate and cost-effective therapies are being offered.

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ridderstråle

Background: Depending on available resources, competencies, and pedagogic preference, initiation of insulin pump therapy can be performed on either an individual or a group basis. Here we compared the two models with respect to resources used. Methods: Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) was used to compare initiating insulin pump treatment in groups (GT) to individual treatment (IT). Activities and cost drivers were identified, timed, or estimated at location. Medical quality and patient satisfaction were assumed to be noninferior and were not measured. Results: GT was about 30% less time-consuming and 17% less cost driving per patient and activity compared to IT. As a batch driver (16 patients in one group) GT produced an upward jigsaw-shaped accumulative cost curve compared to the incremental increase incurred by IT. Taking the alternate cost for those not attending into account, and realizing the cost of opportunity gained, suggested that GT was cost neutral already when 5 of 16 patients attended, and that a second group could be initiated at no additional cost as the attendance rate reached 15:1. Conclusions: We found TDABC to be effective in comparing treatment alternatives, improving cost control and decision making. Everything else being equal, if the setup is available, our data suggest that initiating insulin pump treatment in groups is far more cost effective than on an individual basis and that TDABC may be used to find the balance point.


Author(s):  
Sanja Minic ◽  
Sanja Medenica ◽  
Emir Muzurovic ◽  
Sreten Kavaric ◽  
Aleksandar Djogo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document