Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludovic Canaud ◽  
Baris Ata Ozdemir ◽  
Lucien Chassin-Trubert ◽  
Julien Sfeir ◽  
Pierre Alric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Covered Stent ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Fenestrated Stent Graft ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for complete endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: From July 2014 through September 2018, 35 patients (mean age 66±11 years; 25 men) underwent homemade fenestrated stent-graft repair of acute (n=16) or chronic (n=10) complicated type B aortic dissections (n=16) and dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n=9). Nineteen (54%) procedures were emergent. Results: Zone 2 single-fenestrated stent-grafts were used in 25 cases; the remaining 10 were double-fenestrated stent-grafts deployed in zone 0. Median time for stent-graft modification was 18 minutes (range 16–20). Technical success was achieved in all cases. An immediate distal type I endoleak was treated intraoperatively. Among the double-fenestrated stent-graft cases, the left subclavian artery fenestration could not be cannulated in 2 patients and revascularization was required. Partial coverage of the left common carotid artery necessitated placement of a covered stent in 3 cases. One (3%) patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae. Two type II endoleaks required additional covered stent placement at 5 and 7 days postoperatively, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6% (2 patients with ruptured aortic arch aneurysm). During a mean follow-up of 17.6±13 months, there was no aortic rupture or retrograde dissection. One late type I endoleak was treated with additional proximal fenestrated stent-graft placement. One type II endoleak is currently under observation. One additional patient died (unrelated to the aorta); overall mortality was 9%. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusion: The use of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular repair of aortic arch dissections is feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Dissection Using Customized Single-Branched Fenestrated Stent-Graft

2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442110104
Author(s):  
Xiaoye Li ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Chao Song ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Shibo Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Repair ◽  
Subclavian Artery Occlusion ◽  
Fenestrated Stent Graft

Objectives: To report outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair using customized single-branched fenestrated stent-grafts in treatment of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: Between November 2009 and November 2011, 16 patients with aortic arch dissections underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair utilizing customized unibody single-branched fenestrated stent-graft (UBFSG) in our institution. Results: All 16 patients were male with mean age of 54.50 ± 11.33. The technical success rate was 100%. 30-day mortality rate was 6.25% (n = 1). The median follow-up period was 98 months (range, 0-119). During follow-up, 4 nonaorta-related deaths were recorded. Two (2) cases of left subclavian artery occlusion were observed 12 and 14 months after the operation. Two (2) patients had another successful endovascular repair in time, including one case of type Ib endoleak occurred 100 months after the operation and one case of stent-graft induced new entry tear 38 months after the operation. No stroke and migration of stent-grafts were observed. Conclusions: The branched fenestrated stent-graft may be an effective alternative treatment for aortic arch dissections unfit for open surgery.

Type IIIb Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Zenith Stent Graft

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-519
Author(s):  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
Masaki Kano ◽  
Keita Maruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Rupture ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
System Type ◽  
Type Iiib ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

We present 3 cases of type IIIb endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith stent graft system. Type III endoleak, like type I endoleak, is a high-pressure, high-risk leak that increases sac pressure up to or even above arterial pressure, and is associated with an increased frequency of open conversions or risk of aneurysm rupture. Type IIIb endoleak is rare but there is much concern that the incidence of type IIIb endoleak is likely to increase hereafter; the mechanism of type IIIb endoleak is deterioration of graft fabric in conjunction with stent sutures. Type IIIb endoleak is difficult to diagnose before rupture. The possibility of type IIIb endoleak should be highly suspected when the continued growth of an excluded aneurysm sac without direct radiologic evidence is observed during follow-up. Type IIIb endoleak can be repaired by relining of the stent graft with additional stent grafts.

Total Endovascular Repair With Parallel Stent-Grafts for Postdissection Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm After Prior Proximal Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjun Liu ◽  
Zhenjiang Li ◽  
Jiaxuan Feng ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Zhiqing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽  
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Grafts

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of total endovascular repair with parallel stent-grafts for postoperative residual dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken of 21 patients (mean age 64.0±12.5 years; 17 men) undergoing total endovascular therapy with parallel stent-grafts for postdissection TAAA after prior proximal repair between 2014 and 2016. The preoperative minimum true lumen diameter was 12.3±4.8 mm and the mean extent of dissection was 248.1±48.2 mm. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative medical records were reviewed to assess technical success, spinal cord ischemia, patency of target branch arteries, endoleak, and short-term outcomes of this approach. Results: Technical success was achieved in 17 of 21 patients owing to 4 type I endoleaks at the end of the procedures. A total of 70 branch arteries were revascularized and 14 celiac trunks were covered intentionally without reconstruction. Of 7 intraoperative endoleaks, 2 were managed intraoperatively and 5 (4 type I and 1 type II) disappeared spontaneously within 1 month. No spinal cord or abdominal organ or limb ischemia was observed. Mean follow-up was 16.2±6.1 months. No death or type I or III endoleak occurred during the follow-up; 2 type II endoleaks were observed. Nineteen of the 21 false lumens thrombosed, and the total aortic diameter decreased (57.3±8.4 to 55.3±7.4 mm, p<0.01). Three (4.3%) of 70 target branch arteries occluded during follow-up. The cumulative patency of retrogradely and antegradely revascularized branch arteries was 97.3% vs 100% at 12 months and 91.2% vs 100% at 18 months. Conclusion: Total endovascular therapy with parallel stent-grafts could be an effective alternative in treating postdissection TAAA. Further studies with long-term follow-up and larger sample size are recommended to evaluate the technique.

Outcomes of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair with Surgeon-Modified Fenestrated Stent-Grafts on Zone 0 Landing for Aortic Arch Pathologies

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110364
Author(s):  
Xiaoye Li ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Chao Song ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Shibo Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Subclavian Artery Occlusion ◽  
Fenestrated Stent Graft ◽  
Aortic Arch Repair

Objectives This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft on zone 0 landing for aortic arch pathologies. Methods Between June 2016 and October 2019, 37 consecutive patients underwent total endovascular arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts on zone 0 landing. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative and follow-up morbidity and mortality, and branch artery patency. Results During the study period, 37 patients were treated with total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft. Twenty-one (56.8%) patients were diagnosed with aortic dissections, 15 (40.5%) patients with aneurysms, and 1 (2.7%) patient required reintervention due to endoleak and sac expansion from previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysm. The proximal landing zone for all patients were in zone 0, and all branch arteries of aortic arch were reconstructed. Technical success was achieved in 34 cases (91.9%). Three (8.1%) patients had fenestrations misaligned with target arteries, and the chimney technique was applied as a complementary measure. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5.4% (n=2). Thirty-day stroke rate was 5.4% (n=2). Thirty-day reintervention rate was 2.7% (n=1). At a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 3–49 months), 5 (13.5%) patients died, including 2 aortic-related deaths, 1 nonaortic-related death, and 2 deaths of unknown reason. One (2.7%) patient had stroke. Four patients (10.8%) had reintervention during the follow-up, including 2 cases of left subclavian artery occlusion and 2 cases of type II endoleak. The estimated survival (±SE) at 2 years was 72.4%±9.7% (95% CI 53.4%–91.4%). The estimated freedom from reintervention (±SE) at 2 years was 87.4%±5.9% (95% CI 75.84%–98.96%). Conclusions Total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts on zone 0 landing is an alternate option for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies in experienced centers.

Matched-Pair Analysis of Conventional versus Endoluminal AAA Treatment Outcomes during the Initial Phase of an Aortic Endografting Program

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina U. Cohnert ◽  
Frank Oelert ◽  
Thorsten Wahlers ◽  
Bernhard Gohrbandt ◽  
Ajay Chavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Matched Pair Analysis ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Purpose: To investigate whether endovascular stent-grafts implanted during the early phase of an aortic endografting program have advantages over conventional surgical procedures for treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: In the first months of an endografting program, 37 patients (36 men; mean age 67.9 ± 7.1 years, range 55 to 86) underwent AAA repair with endovascular implantation of a Vanguard (n = 17) or Talent (n = 20) bifurcated stent-graft. Data collected during the perioperative period and in follow-up were compared retrospectively to a matched group of 37 elective surgical patients. Results: All endograft implantations were completed. Two type I and 6 type II endoleaks (21.6%) were seen postoperatively. Five type II sealed without intervention; 1 type I endoleak was corrected with an additional stent, but 1 type I and 1 type II endoleaks persisted despite attempts with coil embolization. Two (5.4%) endograft patients died during the perioperative period; however, this was not significantly different (p = 0.15) from the control group. In the mean follow-up of 12 ± 6 months for both groups, 1 (2.7%) late conversion was necessary at 2 years for aneurysm expansion in an endograft patient with an unsealed type I endoleak. Conclusions: In our learning curve experience with aortic endografting, postoperative morbidity and mortality were higher in endograft patients compared to conventionally treated controls. Only in the endograft group was reoperation required during follow-up. Careful monitoring with periodic imaging studies is mandatory after endoluminal AAA treatment.

Pre-fenestration endovascular repair of aortic diseases in patients with zone 2 segment: A single-center experience

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812097987
Author(s):  
Yu-Jing Zhang ◽  
Lei Bai ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
Hong-Rui Shi ◽  
Jiang-Long Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Type I ◽  
Aortic Diseases ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Repair ◽  
Aortic Lesions

Objective The present study aims to analyze the outcomes of three cases of pre-fenestration and branch stent-graft endovascular repair of aortic disease with zone 2 aortic lesions. Methods From August 2017 to June 2018, three patients with zone 2 aortic lesions underwent thoracic endovascular repair with innominate artery, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery recannulation using pre-fenestration and branched stent-grafts to preserve the patency of the aortic arch branches. Results The technical success rate was 100%. One patient had a proximal type I endoleak with no need for additional treatment. The overall mortality was 0%. All branches were patent. The follow-up period lasted for 2–15 months, with one patient lost to follow-up. There were no conversions to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde type A aortic dissection. Conclusion The use of a pre-fenestration and branch stent-graft for the thoracic endovascular repair of zone 2 aortic lesions is a feasible and effective method for aortic arch branch revascularization. The risk of this surgical procedure is high, requiring significant expertise. The procedure should be conducted only in experienced centers. Durability concerns should be assessed in future studies with long-term follow-up.

Modeling Endoleaks and Collateral Reperfusion following Endovascular AAA Exclusion

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuh K. Chong ◽  
Thien V. How ◽  
Geoffrey L. Gilling-Smith ◽  
Peter L. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Aortic Pressure ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Pump System ◽  
Type Ii Endoleak ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Aortic Pressure

Purpose: To investigate the effect on intrasac pressure of stent-graft deployment within a life-size silicone rubber model of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maintained under physiological conditions of pressure and flow. Methods: A commercial bifurcated device with the polyester fabric preclotted with gelatin was deployed in the AAA model. A pump system generated physiological flow. Mean and pulse aortic and intrasac pressures were measured simultaneously using pressure transducers. To simulate a type I endoleak, plastic tubing was placed between the aortic wall and the stent-graft at the proximal anchoring site. Type II endoleak was simulated by means of side branches with set inflow and outflow pressures and perfusion rates. Type IV endoleak was replicated by removal of gelatin from the graft fabric. Results: With no endoleak, the coated graft reduced the mean and pulse sac pressures to negligible values. When a type I endoleak was present, mean sac pressure reached a value similar to mean aortic pressure. When net flow through the sac due to a type II endoleak was present, mean sac pressure was a function of the inlet pressure, while pulse pressure in the sac was dependent on both inlet and outlet pressures. As perfusion rates increased, both mean and pulse sac pressures decreased. When there was no outflow, mean sac pressure was similar to mean aortic pressure. In the presence of both type I and type II endoleaks, mean sac pressure reached mean aortic pressure when the net perfusion rate was low. Conclusions: In vitro studies are useful in gaining an understanding of the impact of different types of endoleaks, in isolation and in combination, on intrasac pressure after aortic stent-graft deployment.

Stent-Graft Treatment of Penetrating Thoracic Aortic Ulcers

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. II-25-II-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Kos ◽  
Louis Bouchard ◽  
Philippe Otal ◽  
Valérie Chabbert ◽  
Patricia Chemla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Neurological Complication ◽  
Computed Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Aortic Diameter ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Clinical Complications

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of stent-graft placement for the treatment of penetrating thoracic aortic ulcers. Methods: Ten patients (7 men; mean age 73.8 years, range 69–79) were treated for penetrating thoracic aortic ulcers using Talent or Excluder stent-grafts. Preoperative examinations included computed tomographic angiography (CTA), transesophageal echography, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Follow-up included predischarge multimodal imaging and periodic CTA scans after discharge. Endoleaks, aortic diameter changes, and clinical complications were tracked. Results: Technical success was achieved in 100%, but 1 major neurological complication led to death 3 months after the procedure. Radiological follow-up detected 4 early endoleaks (3 type I and a type II), all of which spontaneously regressed, and 1 secondary type II endoleak. The mean aortic diameter decreased by 22% over a mean 9-month follow-up. Conclusions: Aortic ulcers are potentially lethal lesions. Considering its low morbidity and mortality, endovascular repair could widen the treatment options for these lesions.

Early Computed Tomographic Angiography after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Worthwhile or Worthless?

Vascular ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evert J. Waasdorp ◽  
Joost A. van Herwaarden ◽  
Rob H.W. van de Mortel ◽  
Frans L. Moll ◽  
Jean-Paul P.M. de Vries
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Computed Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

This study evaluated the value of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) early after an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in relation to CTA 3 months after EVAR. We retrospectively reviewed all elective EVAR patients with available postprocedural and 3-month follow-up CTAs who were treated between 1996 and 2006. CTAs were analyzed for EVAR-related complications in terms of endoleaks, migration, and stent graft thrombosis. Secondary procedures and other complications within a 4-month time interval after EVAR were noted and analyzed for any association with the postprocedural CTA. During the study period, 291 patients (275 men), with a mean age of 71 years, underwent elective EVAR. All had postprocedural and 3-month follow-up CTAs, which detected 93 (32%) endoleaks (8 type I, 84 type II, 1 type III) and 1 stent graft thrombosis. These findings resulted in four secondary interventions (one interposition cuff, two extension cuffs, one conversion). All reinterventions were successfully done in an elective setting. During the first 3 postoperative months, five other reinterventions were required for acute ischemia in four patients (three Fogarty procedures, one femorofemoral crossover bypass) or groin infection in one patient. Eight patients died, but none of the deaths were related to abdominal aortic aneurysm or EVAR (four cardiac, two pulmonary, one gastric bleeding, one carcinoma). At 3 months, 43 endoleaks (3 type I, 40 type II), 3 stent graft thromboses, and 1 stent graft migration were seen. In two patients (0.7%), a new endoleak was diagnosed compared with the postprocedural CTAs. In 287 (99%) of 291 patients, the postprocedural CTA did not influence our treatment policy in the first 3 months after EVAR. More than half of the early endoleaks were self-limiting, and new endoleaks were seen in only two patients (< 1%) at the 3-month follow-up CTA. After an uneventful EVAR procedure, it is safe to leave out the early postprocedural CTA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document