Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons in the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions (AcoArt II–BTK)

2020 ◽  
pp. 152660282096968
Author(s):  
Xin Jia ◽  
Baixi Zhuang ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Yongquan Gu ◽  
Jiwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose To compare the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) vs uncoated balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo and restenotic infrapopliteal lesions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Materials and Methods The prospective, multicenter, randomized study AcoArt II–BTK study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02137577) enrolled 120 patients who were randomly assigned to angioplasty with either a DCB (n=61; mean age 70.7±7.4 years; 36 men) or a conventional balloon catheter (n=59; mean age 70.8±9.0 years; 36 men). There were no significant differences observed in baseline clinical or target lesion characteristics between the groups. The target lesion length was 169.95±86.35 mm in the DCB group vs 179.93±80.16 mm in the control group, and approximately three-quarters of the lesions were chronic occlusions. Primary patency was assessed by angiography at 6 months, and mortality and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were evaluated at 12 months. Results Primary patency at 6 months was 75.0% in the DCB group and 28.3% in the control group (p<0.001), while late lumen loss was 0.43±0.62 mm for DCBs vs 0.99±0.55 mm for controls (p<0.001). Freedom from CD-TLR at 12 months was 91.5% in the DCB group vs 76.8% in the controls (p=0.03); there was no significant difference in mortality (1.7% DCB vs 3.6% controls; p=0.53). Conclusion This study demonstrated that the Litos/Tulip DCBs are safe and effective in treating infrapopliteal lesions, with improved angiographic and clinical outcomes vs plain balloon angioplasty. The DCBs demonstrated significantly higher primary patency with fewer CD-TLRs than conventional angioplasty. The safety of the DCBs was noninferior to that of the uncoated balloons after 1 year of follow-up.

Effectiveness of the Pulsar-18 self-expanding stent with optional drug-coated balloon angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions – the BIOFLEX PEACE All-Comers Registry

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lichtenberg ◽  
Frank Breuckmann ◽  
Veronika Kramer ◽  
Stefan Betge ◽  
Sebastian Sixt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Nitinol Stent ◽  
Safety Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Summary. Background: Previous studies showed favorable results after treatment of femoropopliteal lesions with the Pulsar-18 self-expanding (SE) nitinol stent. The objective of this registry was to evaluate whether these results will be confirmed in a real-world setting with varying stenting strategies. Patients and methods: In this prospective, observational trial, 160 patients with 186 femoropopliteal lesions were treated with the Pulsar-18 SE nitinol stent at 9 German sites. Mean lesion length was 116 ± 103 mm, and 41.9 % of the lesions were moderately or heavily calcified. Eighty lesions were concomitantly treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB). Main effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, and main safety outcome was freedom from the composite of device or procedure related death, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days and 6 months. Results: Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency was 89.1 %, 67.3 %, and 57.1 % at 6, 12, and 24 months. Freedom from TLR was 95.5 %, 91.4 %, and 85.2 % at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Lesions, which were additionally treated with DCB (plus DCB-group), were longer (150 versus 82 mm on average, p < 0.0001), and associated with lower primary patency estimates than those without DCB angioplasty (stent-only-group) (log-rank p = 0.006). However, there was no difference in freedom from TLR between groups (log-rank p = 0.542). Improvement by ≥ 1 Rutherford category was achieved in 84.8 %, 81.0 %, and 81.7 % of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Walking distance and patient-reported pain improved persistently through 24 months (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic improvement was achieved in 68.2 %, 73.7 %, and 70.7 % of the patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: The Pulsar-18 self-expanding nitinol stent with optional drug-coated balloon angioplasty can be considered an efficacious and safe therapy option for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease.

scholarly journals Drug-Coated Balloon vs Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: One-Year Results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan Randomized Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Iida ◽  
Yoshimitsu Soga ◽  
Kazushi Urasawa ◽  
Shigeru Saito ◽  
Michael R. Jaff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Japanese Cohort ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of the MDT-2113 (IN.PACT Admiral) drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of de novo and native artery restenotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries vs percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with an uncoated balloon in a Japanese cohort. Methods: MDT-2113 SFA Japan ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01947478) is an independently adjudicated, prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial that randomized (2:1) 100 patients (mean age 73.6±7.0 years; 76 men) from 11 Japanese centers to treatment with DCB (n=68) or PTA (n=32). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, including mean lesion length (9.15±5.85 and 8.89±6.01 cm for the DCB and PTA groups, respectively). The primary effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and freedom from restenosis as determined by duplex ultrasonography. The safety endpoint was a composite of 30-day device- and procedure-related death and target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization within 12 months. Results: Patients treated with DCBs exhibited superior 12-month primary patency (89%) compared to patients treated with PTA (48%, p<0.001). The 12-month CD-TLR rate was 3% for DCB vs 19% for PTA (p=0.012). There were no device- or procedure-related deaths, major amputations, or thromboses in either group. Quality-of-life measures showed sustained improvement from baseline to 12 months in both groups. Conclusion: Results from the MDT-2113 SFA Japan trial showed superior treatment effect for DCB vs PTA, with excellent patency and low CD-TLR rates. These results are consistent with other IN.PACT SFA DCB trials and demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of this DCB for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in this Japanese cohort.

scholarly journals Provisional focal stenting of complex femoropopliteal lesions using the Multi-LOC multiple stent delivery system – 12-month results from the LOCOMOTIVE EXTENDED study

VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Klaus Amendt ◽  
Thomas Zeller ◽  
Robert Proczka ◽  
Ulrich Beschorner ◽  
Nicola Troisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Delivery System ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Target Lesion Revascularisation ◽  
Extended Study ◽  
Femoropopliteal Artery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Summary: Background: This study aimed to evaluate a Multiple Stent Delivery System for provisional focal stenting of the femoropopliteal artery. Patient and methods: The LOCOMOTIVE EXTENDED study (Multi-LOC for flOw liMiting Outcomes after plain old balloon angioplasty and/or drug-coated balloon Treatment in the infrainguinal position with the objectIVE to implant multiple stent segments) is a prospective, single-arm, multicentre observational study. The Multi-LOC Multiple Stent Delivery System (B.Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was used for provisional focal stenting of the femoropopliteal artery. We enrolled 357 patients with 449 femoropopliteal lesions; all had flow-limiting dissections or recoil following angioplasty. Eligibility included Rutherford classification 2 to 5 with a de novo or non-stented restenotic femoropopliteal lesion undergoing plain balloon or drug-coated balloon angioplasty. The 6- and 12-month efficacy endpoints encompassed target lesion revascularisation and primary patency rates. Results: The mean patient age was 71 ± 10 years. The mean lesion length was 16.0 ± 9.7 cm; 44.5% were TASC II C/D lesions and 31.4% were chronic total occlusions. By operator choice, 45% of the patients underwent drug-coated balloon angioplasty. On average, 4.0 stents (each 13 mm long) were placed in each lesion, resulting in a scaffolding proportion of 56% of the total lesion length with a technical success rate of 98.3%. At 6 and 12 months, the freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation was 95.5% and 88.7% and the primary patency rates were 88.7% and 82.3%, respectively. At 12 months, significant improvements were noted in Rutherford categories and ankle-brachial indices. In multiple regression analyses, both diabetes mellitus and no distal run-off vessel showed a trend toward worse TLR, while other factors such as DCB predilation or the lesion length were not predictive. Conclusions: The LOCOMOTIVE EXTENDED study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Multi-LOC stent system for focal provisional stenting of complex femoropopliteal lesions.

scholarly journals PRELUDE Prospective Study of the Serranator Device in the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Holden ◽  
Andrew Hill ◽  
Andrew Walker ◽  
Brendan Buckley ◽  
Stephen Merrilees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Vessel Diameter ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusions ◽  
The Core ◽  
Safety Endpoint ◽  
Exciting Potential ◽  
Primary Safety Endpoint

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Serranator Alto PTA Serration Balloon Catheter in subjects with peripheral artery disease in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. Materials and Methods: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm feasibility study enrolled 25 patients (mean age 66 years; 18 men) to evaluate Serranator inflation and postinflation effects under monitoring by independent core laboratories. Inclusion criteria were claudication or ischemic rest pain, de novo lesions or native artery restenosis, >70% stenosis, lesion length <10 cm, and a reference vessel diameter of 4 to 6 mm. Chronic total occlusions (CTO) up to 6 cm in length were allowed (n=8). The primary safety endpoint was 30-day major adverse events. Primary efficacy outcome was device success with final diameter stenosis <50%. The secondary objective was to confirm the presence of serrations across the lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following treatment in a subset of 10 subjects. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 30 days and 6 months. Results: Technical success of device delivery and retrieval was 100%. The primary safety endpoint was met, with no patients experiencing a major adverse event in the first 30 days. Pretreatment stenosis of 88% was reduced to 23%. One stent was implanted for grade D dissection in a CTO. The core laboratory–adjudicated primary patency was 100% at 1 month and 64% at 6 months. Serrations were confirmed in all 10 OCT/IVUS images reviewed by the core laboratory. The Rutherford category showed significant and sustained improvement at 6 months. Conclusion: The Serranator is a safe and efficacious angioplasty balloon catheter system. This new design provides an exciting potential for optimizing vessel preparation and aiding drug delivery.

Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Long Infrapopliteal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aljoscha Rastan ◽  
Marianne Brodmann ◽  
Tanja Böhme ◽  
Roland Macharzina ◽  
Elias Noory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Target Vessel ◽  
Target Vessel Revascularization ◽  
Infrapopliteal Artery ◽  
Directional Atherectomy ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Background: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials show no beneficial impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy alone on the technical and clinical outcomes of infrapopliteal artery lesions in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of directional atherectomy (DA) plus DCB angioplasty versus DCB alone in treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, 2-center trial comparing the performance of DA+DCB and DCB alone in treatment of 80 patients with de novo infrapopliteal artery lesions. The primary study end point was the 6-month primary patency of the target lesion detected by angiography and duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included clinically driven target vessel revascularization, amputation rates, and changes in Rutherford-Becker class at 1 year. A core laboratory provides independent analyses for all scheduled and unscheduled duplex ultrasound examinations and angiographies, and a research institute ensured independent data collection. Results: The mean target lesion length was 179.7±98.2 mm. Nine patients (11.3%) died during the follow-up period. At 6 months, primary patency was 49% (n=18) with DA+DCB versus 34% (n=12) with DCB alone ( P =0.241), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization was 8% (n=3) versus 14% (n=5; P =0.475), respectively. At 1 year, the TLR rates were 30% (n=10) versus 43% (n=12; P =0.308), the median in Rutherford-Becker class was 2 (0.25–5) versus 5 (0.25–5; P =0.329), and amputation rates were 22% (n=8) versus 32% (n=11; P =0.618) in the DA+DCB group and the DCB group, respectively. Conclusions: Treatment of long infrapopliteal artery lesions with DA+DCB versus DCB alone leads to comparable clinical and technical results at 6 months and 1 year. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01763476.

A retrospective comparison analysis of results of drug-coated balloon versus plain balloon angioplasty in treatment of juxta-anastomotic de novo stenosis of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 596-601
Author(s):  
Cemal Kocaaslan ◽  
Ahmet Oztekin ◽  
Mehmet Senel Bademci ◽  
Emine Seyma Denli Yalvac ◽  
Nurgul Bulut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Transluminal Angioplasty ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Anastomotic Stenosis ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Percutaneous Transluminal ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Background: Juxta-anastomotic stenosis is a common issue of arteriovenous fistulas. We aimed to evaluate the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with drug-coated balloon versus plain balloon for the treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses of mature but failing distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas. Methods: A total of 80 patients with a juxta-anastomotic stenosis of distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula in our clinic between January 2016 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of treatment as drug-coated balloon – percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 44) and plain balloon – percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 43). Intra- and post-procedural data were recorded. Target lesion primary patency rate was evaluated at 6 and 12 months. Of all patients, 48 were females and 39 were males with a mean age of 56.3 ± 10.4 (range, 24–75) years. Both groups had mature fistulas, and the mean age of fistula was 11.3 ± 9.1 months in the drug-coated balloon – percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group and 10.3 ± 8.8 months in the plain balloon – percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group (p = 0.24). Results: There was no significant difference in the target lesion stenosis rate and the median lesion length between the groups. Technical and clinical success were achieved in both groups. Target lesion primary patency was similar at 6 months between the two groups (93.1% vs 81.3%, respectively; p = 0.14) but significantly higher for the drug-coated balloon – percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group at 12 months (81.8% vs 51.1%, respectively; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our study results suggest that the use of drug-coated balloon combined with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is an effective treatment for juxta-anastomotic stenoses of mature but failing distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas with significantly improved target lesion primary patency rates and reduced need for juxta-anastomotic reinterventions.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 647-657
Author(s):  
Stefanos Giannopoulos ◽  
Sheila Ghanian ◽  
Sahil A. Parikh ◽  
Eric A. Secemsky ◽  
Peter A. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Procedural Success ◽  
Random Effects Modeling ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal lesions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to January 2020 to identify randomized trials and observational studies presenting data on the effectiveness and safety of DCBs in the treatment of femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal lesions. A meta-analysis utilizing random effects modeling was conducted to investigate primary patency and all-cause mortality at 12 months; the results are reported as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes were procedural success, bailout stenting, target lesion revascularization (TLR), reocclusion, major amputation, wound healing, and major adverse limb events. Results: Twenty-six studies, 12 retrospective and 14 prospective, comprising 2108 CLTI patients treated with DCBs for femoropopliteal (n=1315) or infrapopliteal (n=793) lesions were analyzed. The average lesion lengths were 121±44 and 135±53 mm, respectively. The overall 12-month all-cause mortality and major amputation rates were 9% (95% CI 6% to 13%) and 5% (95% CI 2% to 8%), respectively. Primary patency rates were 82% (95% CI 76% to 87%) and 64% (95% CI 58% to 70%), respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the infrapopliteal lesions demonstrated no difference between DCB and balloon angioplasty in terms of primary patency, TLR, major amputation, or mortality over 12 months. However, patients with infrapopliteal lesions undergoing DCB angioplasty did have a significantly lower risk for reocclusion (10% vs 25%; OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.70, p=0.002). Conclusion: DCB angioplasty of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions in patients with CLTI results in acceptable 12-month patency rates, although comparative data have not shown a patency benefit for infrapopliteal lesions. The 12-month mortality rate of DCB vs balloon angioplasty was not significantly different, but studies with longer-term outcomes are necessary to determine any association between DCB use and mortality in patients with CLTI.

Novel Nitinol Stent for Lesions up to 24 cm in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: 24-Month Results From the TIGRIS Randomized Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Laird ◽  
Thomas Zeller ◽  
Christian Loewe ◽  
Jack Chamberlin ◽  
Richard Begg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
The United States ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Stent Fracture ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
High Flexibility

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TIGRIS stent for lesions up to 24 cm in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries (SFA/PPA). Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled 274 subjects at 36 sites in the United States and Europe. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to treatment with the TIGRIS stent (n=197; mean age 66.7±9.28 years; 141 men) or LifeStent (n=70; mean age 67.9±8.87 years; 49 men). The primary safety endpoint was 30-day freedom from major adverse events (MAE). The primary efficacy endpoint was primary patency at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent fracture. Clinical success and quality of life were also assessed. Results: Mean lesion length (107.6 vs 117.9 mm, p=0.29), procedure success (99.5% vs 97.1%, p=0.17), and freedom from MAE (99.5% vs 100%, p>0.99) were similar for the TIGRIS and control groups, respectively. Likewise, there was no difference in primary patency at 12 months (60.6% vs 63.2%, p=0.73) or 24 months (56.3% vs 50.2%, p=0.60) or in TLR at the same time points (76.6% vs 80.6%, p=0.49; 70.5% vs 67.2%, p=0.85). There were no differences in the changes in Rutherford category or the ankle/brachial index through 24 months. The rate of stent fracture was lower for TIGRIS compared with LifeStent (0% vs 32.7%, p<0.001). Conclusion: The TIGRIS stent and LifeStent were similarly effective for the treatment of lesions in the SFA and PPA. The high flexibility and zero fracture rate associated with the TIGRIS stent make this device favorable for use in high-flexion arteries.

scholarly journals Drug‐Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Dysfunction: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenyu Liu ◽  
Matthew Wolfers ◽  
Bint‐e Zainab Awan ◽  
Issa Ali ◽  
Adrian Michael Lorenzana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Target Lesion Revascularization ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Background Both drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and conventional plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) can be implemented to treat hemodialysis dysfunction. The present study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of these 2 approaches by conducting a meta‐analysis of available randomized controlled trials. Methods and Results PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were queried from establishment to January 2021. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials including 877 and 875 patients in the DCB and PBA groups, respectively, were included in the present meta‐analysis. Target lesion primary patency, circuit patency, target lesion revascularization, and mortality were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported with 95% CIs. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plot and Egger test. Target lesion primary patency was higher among patients who underwent DCB (OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 2.13–4.03], P <0.001 at 6 months; OR, 2.47 [95% CI, 1.53–3.99], P <0.001 at 1 year). Also, the DCB group had a higher dialysis circuit patency at 6 months (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.56–3.77 [ P <0.001]) and 1 year (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.22–3.00 [ P =0.005]). Compared with the PBA group, the DCB group had lower odds of target lesion revascularization during follow‐up (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23–0.82], P =0.001 at 6 months; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.32–1.73], P =0.490 at 1 year). The OR of mortality was comparable between 2 groups at 6 months (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.42–3.33 [ P =0.760]) and 1 year (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58–1.48 [ P =0.750]). Conclusions Based on evidence from 18 randomized controlled trials, DCB angioplasty is superior to PBA in maintaining target lesion primary patency and circuit patency among patients with dialysis circuit stenosis. DCB angioplasty also reduces target lesion revascularization with a similar risk of mortality compared with PBA.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty in treatment of total occlusions with severe femoropopliteal lesions: An additional analysis from the AcoArt I study

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812095366
Author(s):  
Guoyi Sun ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Senhao Jia ◽  
Jiwei Zhang ◽  
Baixi Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Target Lesion Revascularization ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusions ◽  
Late Lumen Loss ◽  
Drug Coated Balloon

Objectives Femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions are challenging to treat, and evidence of the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon angioplasty for long femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion lesions is limited. We compared the midterm outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions. Methods In total, 95 patients from the AcoArt I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01850056) with ≥5-cm femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion lesions were enrolled in this post-hoc subset analysis (drug-coated balloon, n = 50; POBA, n = 45). The primary endpoints were primary patency and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 24 months. The secondary endpoints were late lumen loss at six months and binary restenosis, major adverse events (composite of death and target limb amputation), change in the Rutherford class, and the ankle-brachial index at 24 months. Results Demographic, clinical, and lesion characteristics were matched (mean lesion length, 20 cm). The six-month late-lumen loss rate was lower in the drug-coated balloon than POBA group (0.18 ± 0.81 vs. 1.34 ± 0.94 mm, respectively; P < 0.001). The 24-month primary patency rate was significantly higher in the drug-coated balloon than POBA group (53.85% vs. 17.50%, respectively; P < 0.001). The CD-TLR rate in the drug-coated balloon and POBA groups was 12.77 and 45.24%, respectively ( P = 0.002). The 24-month overall mortality rate in the drug-coated balloon and POBA groups was 12.77% and 6.98%, respectively ( P = 0.360), with no device- or procedure-related deaths. One major amputation had occurred in each group by the 24-month follow-up. Conclusion The paclitaxel drug-coated balloon shows better primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization than POBA at 24 months after treatment of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (≥5 cm) lesion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document