Using external memory aids to increase room finding by older adults with dementia

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. D. Nolan ◽  
R. Mark Mathews ◽  
Melanie Harrison
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 809-809
Author(s):  
Pizzonia K ◽  
Suhr J

Abstract Objectives Older adults often use memory strategies to assist with age-associated memory changes, and interventions targeting successful memory strategy use may promote independence. However, individuals vary in their use of memory strategies. We investigated individual difference factors involved in memory strategy use in older adults. Method As part of a larger study on stress and aging, 123 healthy community-dwelling adults over the age of 50 completed various assessments. The present analyses included 91 participants (54% female, mean age 60.80, SD = 8.75) who had completed all measures of interest. Reported external and internal memory strategy use and anxiety about memory ability were measured by the Metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) questionnaire. Psychological variables were measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, and MIA. Memory and working memory performance were assessed using the RBANS, Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, and Auditory Consonant Trigrams. Results Within the context of our model, we found that education (p = .036) and anxiety about memory performance (p = .010) predicted internal memory strategy use, while gender (p = .011), education (p < .001), and anxiety about memory ability (p = .011) predicted external memory strategy use. None of the other variables were related to memory strategy use. Conclusions Though cross-sectional in nature, our results have implications for understanding successful memory strategy use. Regarding demographics, female gender and higher education predicted external memory strategy use, while only education predicted internal memory strategy use. Also, anxiety about memory performance predicted the use of internal and external memory strategies rather than objective memory performance.


Author(s):  
Heather C. Lum ◽  
Valerie K. Sims ◽  
Nicholas C. Lagattuta ◽  
Michael A. Rosen ◽  
Eduardo Salas

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather C. Lum ◽  
Valerie K. Sims ◽  
Nicholas C. Lagattuta ◽  
Michael A. Rosen ◽  
Eduardo Salas

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd M. Ruppar ◽  
Vicki S. Conn ◽  
Cynthia L. Russell

This literature review explores the range and nature of medication adherence interventions tested with older adults. The unique needs of older adults require specifically designed and tailored interventions. Low medication adherence rates among some elderly contribute to inadequate pharmacological management of illnesses. Searches were conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of medication adherence; computerized databases, journal hand searches, and ancestry searches yielded 63 studies published between 1977 and 2005 where participants’ mean age was > 60 years. Interventions were categorized by focus (patient, medication, and administration factors). Most were geared toward promoting knowledge and skills for medication-taking and adherence. Gaps were noted in addressing memory aids and self-monitoring strategies; further development of interventions addressing medication and administration factors influencing adherence are also needed. Identified interventions are geared toward self-medicating patients and fail to address caregivers administering medications. Finally, interventions do little to address variations in patterns of adherence among older adults.


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
John O. Brooks ◽  
Leah Friedman ◽  
Jerome A. Yesavage

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of external memory devices on the efficacy of a package of internal mnemonic techniques. Participants wrote two types of lists during the study phase: (a) a list of study words and/or (b) a loci list. At recall, participants were not allowed to refer to either of the lists they had written during the study. Design: 2 × 2 factorial with writing study words (“write” or “not write”) and writing down a previously established loci list (“write” or “not write”) manipulated as between-participants variables. Participants: 68 community-dwelling adults 55 years of age and older who wished to improve their memory. Measurements: Free word recall. Results: There were statistically significant effects of writing the loci list, but not of writing the list of study words. Scores were higher when participants wrote the loci lists compared to when they did not. Conclusions: Use of external mnemonics may enhance the efficacy of internal mnemonics, even when the external mnemonic is not used at the time of recall.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document