Self-Perceived Knowledge and Self-Efficacy of External Memory Aids Survey

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie F. Douglas ◽  
Rebecca H. Affoo
2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. D. Nolan ◽  
R. Mark Mathews ◽  
Melanie Harrison

Author(s):  
Heather C. Lum ◽  
Valerie K. Sims ◽  
Nicholas C. Lagattuta ◽  
Michael A. Rosen ◽  
Eduardo Salas

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather C. Lum ◽  
Valerie K. Sims ◽  
Nicholas C. Lagattuta ◽  
Michael A. Rosen ◽  
Eduardo Salas

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
James A. Roberts ◽  
Meredith E. David

Recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data reveal that COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality rates are higher for certain racial/ethnic groups. Labeled as the “pandemic within a pandemic”, African Americans and Hispanics are bearing more of the brunt of the disease compared to Caucasians. Testing a new sequential mediation model on a sample of 483 US African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic adults, the present study investigates the role of fear of COVID-19, information receptivity, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy to explain disparities in preventive behaviors. Study contributions include the specification of a new predictive model that improves upon the long-used Health Belief Model (HBM). The Sequential Mediation Model appears to have greater explanatory capacity than the HBM. Study results also provide important insights into racial/ethnic differences in health-seeking behavior related to the coronavirus. Findings show that African Americans reported higher levels of preventive behaviors and self-efficacy than Caucasians. It is possible that SES, rather than race per se, is more important in explaining differences in COVID-19 preventive behaviors. Certain “cues to action” (precipitating factors) also help explain this somewhat surprising result. Additionally, significant differences were found across the three racial/ethnic groups for all the new model’s variables except perceived knowledge. The new model was supported across all three racial/ethnic groups with notable differences across each group. Given the severity of implications surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic (physical, mental, and economic), it is critical that an improved understanding of what drives individual health-seeking behavior be achieved. Study limitations and future research suggestions are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyra Bokkers ◽  
Ronald P. Zweemer ◽  
Marco J. Koudijs ◽  
Sanne Stehouwer ◽  
Mary E. Velthuizen ◽  
...  

AbstractAccording to current guidelines, all women with epithelial ovarian cancer are eligible for genetic testing for BRCA germline pathogenic variants. Unfortunately, not all affected women are tested. We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility for non-genetic healthcare professionals to incorporate germline genetic testing into their daily practice. We developed and implemented a mainstreaming pathway, including a training module, in collaboration with various healthcare professionals and patient organizations. Healthcare professionals from 4 different hospitals were invited to participate. After completing the training module, gynecologic oncologists, gynecologists with a subspecialty training in oncology, and nurse specialists discussed and ordered genetic testing themselves. They received a questionnaire before completing the training module and 6 months after working according to the new pathway. We assessed healthcare professionals’ attitudes, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy, along with the feasibility of this new mainstream workflow in clinical practice, and evaluated the use and content of the training module. The participation rate for completing the training module was 90% (N = 19/21). At baseline and after 6 months, healthcare professionals had a positive attitude, high perceived knowledge and high self-efficacy toward discussing and ordering genetic testing. Knowledge had increased significantly after 6 months. The training module was rated with an average of 8.1 out of 10 and was considered useful. The majority of healthcare professionals (9/15) was able to discuss a genetic test in five to 10 min. After completion of a training module, non-genetic healthcare professionals feel motivated and competent to discuss and order genetic testing themselves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document