Impact of Alternate Assessment on Curricula for Students With Severe Disabilities

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Alisa Lowrey ◽  
Erik Drasgow ◽  
Adelle Renzaglia ◽  
Laura Chezan
2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew E. Brock ◽  
Heartley B. Huber

Peer support arrangements involve peers without disabilities providing academic and social support to students with severe disabilities (i.e., students eligible for their state’s alternate assessment) in general education classrooms. We conducted a systematic literature review of studies published through 2016 to determine whether peer support arrangements meet Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) criteria as an evidence-based practice. From our review of 11 studies, we found that peer support arrangements are an evidence-based practice for promoting social interactions for secondary students with severe disabilities in both core academic and elective classes. Evidence for increased academic engagement of students with severe disabilities is mixed, and evidence for other outcomes is promising—including increased academic engagement for peers who provide support. We provide recommendations for teachers.


2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane M. Browder ◽  
Fred Spooner ◽  
Mary Anna Bingham

Alternate assessment and access to the general curriculum are the focus of much attention today for professionals and practitioners who provide services to students who have severe disabilities. Current legislation in the United States requires states to include students with severe disabilities in state‐wide assessments. The rationale is to require schools to be accountable for the progress of all students. Including students with severe disabilities in school accountability systems has created the need to rethink curriculum for this population and develop alternate assessments. In recent decades educators have focused on functional curriculum for students with severe disabilities, but recent federal legislation in the United States called No Child Left Behind requires schools to collect data on the yearly progress in academic content areas. Educators are focusing on ways to define alternate achievement standards for reading and mathematics for students with severe disabilities. States have developed a variety of formats for alternate assessments to be used for students who cannot participate in large scale assessments with accommodations. This article describes: (a) how the move towards including all students in school accountability is impacting curriculum for students with severe disabilities, (b) the decisions states must make in developing alternate assessments, and (c) recommendations for future practice and research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-114
Author(s):  
Morgan E. Herbert ◽  
Matthew E. Brock ◽  
Mary A. Barczak ◽  
Eric J. Anderson

Peer networks are a promising intervention for increasing social interactions between students with severe disabilities and their peers. However, this approach has not been well studied with high school students who have complex communication needs and use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). In this study, we used a multiple probe across participants design to evaluate the effectiveness of a lunchtime peer-network intervention for three high school students with autism and/or multiple disabilities who had complex communication needs. The intervention involved recruiting peers, sharing practical background information and modeling how to communicate with the student, and then providing support as needed. A functional relation was established between the introduction of the peer-network intervention and both social interactions and social engagement. Interactions increased substantially across communication modalities. This study builds on the peer-network literature by demonstrating how this approach can be tailored for high school students with complex communication needs.


Author(s):  
Melaura Andree Erickson Tomaino ◽  
Alissa L. Greenberg ◽  
Sarah Ann Kagawa-Purohit ◽  
Sagui A. Doering ◽  
Edward Steven Miguel

AbstractSchools across the country closed their doors during the COVID-19 pandemic. These measures impacted all students, as schools, educators, and families grappled with the realities of transitioning to distance-learning platforms. The research on distance learning is still in its early phases. However, almost no research exists on educating students with severe disabilities and high behavioral needs using this technology. Study 1 collected survey data from students’ families and their educators on the feasibility and effectiveness of distance-learning programs when working with students with severe developmental disabilities and high behavioral needs. Results indicated that parents and educators had generally neutral attitudes toward distance learning, although educators agreed that their students were obtaining educational benefits during distance learning. Study 2 further examined the effects of a transition to distance learning on students’ Individualized Education Plan (IEP) goal progress. Analyses revealed that students maintained about half of the skills addressed in their IEPs and made progress on an additional quarter of their IEP goals. Findings contribute to a much-needed literature base on distance learning and provide additional information as to the feasibility and effectiveness of distance learning with students with severe developmental disabilities and high behavioral needs. Future work is needed to determine best practices for distance learning with this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document