Efficacy of VBHOM to Predict Outcome Following Major Lower Limb Amputation

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Patterson ◽  
Andrew J. Degnan ◽  
Stewart R. Walsh ◽  
Mohammed Eltayeb ◽  
Earl F. Scout ◽  
...  

Purpose: This study tests an existing Vascular Biochemistry and Haematology Outcome Model (VBHOM) on independent data and presents further refinements to the model. Methods: Data from 306 patients who underwent lower limb amputation over a 4-year period were collated. Urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, hemoglobin, white cell count, albumin, age, gender, mode-of-admission, and short-term mortality events were extracted from the database. This study tests an existing model and trains a new model for predicting mortality using forward stepwise logistic regression. Results: The existing model suggests a significant lack of fit (c-index = 0.665, P = .04). For the exception of gender and mode-of-admission, all predictor variables had significant univariate associations with short-term mortality ( P < .05). The refined model included age, sodium, potassium, creatinine, and albumin and had good discriminatory power (c-index = 0.8, no evidence of lack of fit, P = .616). Conclusions: Our simplified model had good predictive ability and suggests redundancy in input variables used by the existing models.

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 261-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Whittaker ◽  
Richard Tullett ◽  
Neesha Patel ◽  
Jeremy Newman ◽  
Andrew Garnham ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 658-666.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy J. Cheun ◽  
Lalithapriya Jayakumar ◽  
Matthew J. Sideman ◽  
Lucas Ferrer ◽  
Christopher Mitromaras ◽  
...  

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Gwilym ◽  
C Waldron ◽  
E Thomas-Jones ◽  
P Pallmann ◽  
R Preece ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? Methods A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. Results PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. Discussion This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort.


Spinal Cord ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 174-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cavigelli ◽  
R Fischer ◽  
V Dietz

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0170705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Dillon ◽  
Lauren V. Fortington ◽  
Muhammad Akram ◽  
Bircan Erbas ◽  
Friedbert Kohler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document