Single Tertiary Care Center Outcomes After Lower Extremity Cadaveric Vein Bypass for Limb Salvage

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 430-435
Author(s):  
Kuldeep Singh ◽  
Amandeep Juneja ◽  
Tushar Bajaj ◽  
Christian Voto ◽  
Jonathan Schor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Objective: Cadaveric saphenous vein (CV) conduits are used in rare instances for limb salvage in patients without autogenous veins although long-term outcome data are scarce. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of CV bypass in patients with threatened limbs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts from 2010 to 2017 of 25 patients who underwent 30 CV allografts for critical limb ischemia and acute limb ischemia. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, smoking status, indications for bypass, and outcomes. Primary outcomes included graft patency, major amputation rates, and mortality. Secondary outcomes measured included infection rates, 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Statistical analysis was performed using time series and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: A total of 30 limbs received CV lower extremity bypasses (20 males, 10 female), and the average age was 68 ± 4 years. Primary patency rates were 71%, 42%, and 28% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Assisted primary patency rates were 78%, 56%, and 37% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Secondary patency rates were 77%, 59%, and 28% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Minor amputations, defined as amputations below the transmetatarsal level occurred in 5 (20%) patients. Wound infection occurred in 8 (32%) patients which was managed with local wound care and no patients required an extraanatomic bypass for limb salvage. Thirty-day MALE occurred in 7 (23.3%) patients. We had no 30-day mortality or MACE. The average graft length was 64.2 ± 8 cm with an average graft diameter of 3.9 ± 2 mm. Amputation-free survival and overall survival at 12 months were 20 (68%) and 21 (84%), respectively. Conclusions: Cadaveric saphenous vein allograft may be used as a bypass conduit as a viable surgical option before limb amputation. Despite the poor patency rates, the limb salvage rates of cadaveric vein grafts demonstrate that this alternate conduit may be considered when no autogenous vein is available.

Preliminary six-month outcomes of LIMBSAVE (treatment of critical Limb IscheMia with infragenicular Bypass adopting in situ SAphenous VEin technique) registry

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812096612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Troisi ◽  
Giovanni De Blasis ◽  
Mauro Salvini ◽  
Stefano Michelagnoli ◽  
Carlo Setacci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Bypass Patency ◽  
The Mean

Objectives Guidelines recommend open bypass surgery for long occlusions of infrainguinal arteries. In situ saphenous vein bypass is a standardized technique. The aim of this study was to report preliminary six-month outcomes of a national, multicenter, observational, prospective registry based on the examination of treatment of critical Limb IscheMia with infragenicular Bypass adopting the in situ SAphenous VEin technique (LIMBSAVE). Methods From January 2018 until October 2019, 428 patients from 41 centers were enrolled in the LIMBSAVE registry. Data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database, including demographics, preoperative risk factors, clinical and diagnostic preoperative assessments, intraoperative measures (including safety and effectiveness of the valvulotome during the surgical procedures), and 30-day follow-up data. Furthermore, estimated six-month outcomes according to Kaplan–Meier curves in terms of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were evaluated. Results Patients were predominantly male ( n = 332, 77.6%) with a mean age of 73.3 years (range 39–95). Technical success, defined as bypass pulse after use of the valvulotome, was obtained in all cases. The proximal anastomosis could be reached by the valvulotome in all cases. The mean number of valvulotome uses was 2.5 (range 1–5). No vein perforation was reported. In nine cases (2.1%), a vein lesion with intramural hemorrhage occurred. The mean length of hospital stay was 11.1 days (range 1–60). At 30-day follow-up, the overall bypass patency rate was 97.4%, and the rate of open or endo reinterventions for failing bypass was 5.4%. At six-month follow-up, the estimated primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were 78.1%, 86.2%, 92.1%, and 94.7%, respectively. Conclusions Preliminary intraprocedural outcomes of the LIMBSAVE registry show that the in situ technique with the valvulotome is safe and effective in disrupting valves and obtaining pulsatility in the saphenous vein. The complication rate related to the use of the valvulotome is low. The six-month preliminary outcomes in terms of overall patency and limb salvage are promising. Further examinations and continuous follow-up are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals The role of directional atherectomy in critical-limb ischemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 175394472110469
Author(s):  
Prakash Krishnan ◽  
Arthur Tarricone ◽  
Simon Chen ◽  
Samin Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Directional Atherectomy ◽  
Procedural Success

Background: Our aim was to review the current literature of the use of directional atherectomy (DA) in the treatment of lower extremity critical-limb ischemia. Methods: A search for relevant literature was performed in PubMed and PubMed Central on 16 April 2020, sorted by best match. Three searches across two databases were performed. Articles were included that contained clinical and procedural data of DA interventions in lower extremity critical-limb ischemia patients. All studies that were systematic reviews were excluded. Results: Eleven papers were included in this review. Papers were examined under several parameters: primary patency and secondary patency, limb salvage/amputation, technical/procedural success, complications/periprocedural events, and mean lesion length. Primary and secondary patency rates ranged from 56.3% to 95.0% and 76.4% to 100%, respectively. Limb salvage rates ranged from 69% to 100%. Lesion lengths were highly varied, representing a broad population, ranging from 30 ± 33 mm to 142.4 ± 107.9 mm. Conclusions: DA may be a useful tool in the treatment of lower extremity critical-limb ischemia.

The Upper-Arm Basilic-Cephalic Loop: A Valueable Alternative for Below-Knee Arterial Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442098061
Author(s):  
Florian K. Enzmann ◽  
Peter Metzger ◽  
Julio Ellacuriaga San Martin ◽  
Werner Dabernig ◽  
Fatema Akhavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Autologous Vein ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Vein Grafts ◽  
First Choice

Introduction: Despite advances of endovascular interventions, bypass surgery remains the gold standard for treatment of long and complex arterial occlusions in the lower limb. Autologous vein is regarded superior to other options. As the graft of first choice, the great saphenous vein (GSV) is often not available due to previous bypass, stripping or poor quality. Other options like arm veins (AV) are important alternatives. As forearm portions of AVs are often unusable, a graft created from the upper arm basilic and cephalic veins provides a valuable alternative. Patients and Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral center between 01/1998 and 07/2018 using arm veins as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study endpoints were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage and survival. Results: In the observed time period 2702 bypass procedures were performed at our institution for below-knee arterial reconstructions. Vein grafts used included the ipsilateral GSV (iGSV; n = 1937/71.7%), contralateral GSV (cGSV; 192/7.1%), small saphenous vein (SSV; 133/4.9%), prosthetic conduits (61/2.3%) and different configurations of AV (379/14%). In the majority of patients receiving AV grafts a complete continuous cephalic or basilic vein (CAV) was used (n = 292/77%). If it was not possible to use major parts of these 2 veins, either spliced arm vein grafts (SAV) (42/11%) or an upper arm basilic-cephalic loop graft (45/12%) were used. Median follow-up was 27 (interquartile range: 8-50) months. After 3 years secondary patency (CAV: 85%; SAV: 62%; loop: 66%; p = 0.125) and limb salvage rates (CAV: 79%, SAV: 68%; loop: 79%; p = 0.346) were similar between the 3 bypass options. Conclusion: The encouraging results of alternative AV configurations highlight their value in case the basilic or cephalic veins are not useable in continuity. Especially for infragenual redo-bypass procedures, these techniques should be considered to offer patients durable revascularization options.

Comparison of propaten heparin-bonded vascular graft with distal anastomotic patch versus autogenous saphenous vein graft in tibial artery bypass

Vascular ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Kaisar ◽  
Aaron Chen ◽  
Mathew Cheung ◽  
Elias Kfoury ◽  
Carlos F Bechara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Vein Graft ◽  
Saphenous Vein Graft ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Graft Occlusion ◽  
Tibial Artery

Introduction Heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (Propaten, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) have been shown to have superior patency compared to standard prosthetic grafts in leg bypass. This study analyzed the outcomes of Propaten grafts with distal anastomotic patch versus autogenous saphenous vein grafts in tibial artery bypass. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data was performed during a recent 15-year period. Sixty-two Propaten bypass grafts with distal anastomotic patch (Propaten group) were compared with 46 saphenous vein graft (vein group). Pertinent clinical variables including graft patency and limb salvage were analyzed. Results Both groups had similar clinical risk factors, bypass indications, and target vessel for tibial artery anastomoses. Decreased trends of operative time (196 ± 34 min vs. 287 ± 65 min, p = 0.07) and length of hospital stay (5.2 ± 2.3 days vs. 7.5 ± 3.6, p = 0.08) were noted in the Propaten group compared to the vein group. Similar primary patency rates were noted at four years between the Propaten and vein groups (85%, 71%, 64%, and 57%, vs. 87%, 78%, 67%, and 61% respectively; p = 0.97). Both groups had comparable secondary patency rates yearly in four years (the Propaten group: 84%, 76%, 74%, and 67%, respectively; the vein group: 88%, 79%, 76%, and 72%, respectively; p = 0.94). The limb salvage rates were equivalent between the Propaten and vein group at four years (84% vs. 92%, p = 0.89). Multivariate analysis showed active tobacco usage and poor run-off score as predictors for graft occlusion. Conclusions Propaten grafts with distal anastomotic patch have similar clinical outcomes compared to the saphenous vein graft in tibial artery bypass. Our data support the use of Propaten graft with distal anastomotic patch as a viable conduit of choice in patients undergoing tibial artery bypass.

Results of isolated infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia in high-risk diabetic patients

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Tartaglia ◽  
A Lejay ◽  
Y Georg ◽  
M Roussin ◽  
F Thaveau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Cerebrovascular Event ◽  
Arterial Lesions ◽  
Infrapopliteal Angioplasty

Aim Infrapopliteal occlusive arterial lesions mostly characterize diabetic patients arteriopathy. Diabetic patients are prone to multiple comorbidities that make them candidates for low-invasive therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of infrapopliteal angioplasty in high-risk diabetic patients. Methods We undertook a study (retrospective study of a prospectively collected database) of all infrapopliteal endovascular revascularizations performed for critical limb ischemia in high-risk (≥3 major comorbidities) diabetic patients in our institution between 2008 and 2010. Study end points were safety, technical success rate, healing rate, overall 1-year survival, primary patency, secondary patency and limb salvage rates. Results A total of 101 high-risk diabetic patients (160 arterial lesions: 94 stenosis and 66 occlusions) underwent infrapopliteal endovascular surgery. No major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event was recorded within 30 days. Two major adverse limb events (two thromboses requiring major amputation) and seven minor adverse events were recorded. Technical and healing rates were, respectively, 83% and 78%. The 1-year survival, primary patency, secondary patency and limb salvage rates were, respectively, 86%, 67%, 83% and 84%. Conclusion Infrapopliteal angioplasty can be considered as a safe and feasible option for high-risk diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.

Long-Term Results of Distal Bypass for Intermittent Claudication

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Taira Kobayashi ◽  
Masaki Hamamoto ◽  
Takanobu Okazaki ◽  
Tomoaki Honma ◽  
Shinya Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Intermittent Claudication ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Barthel Index ◽  
Daily Activity ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
The Mean

Background: Distal bypass (DB) is the optimal treatment for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). However, effectiveness of DB for patients with intermittent claudication (IC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to analyze long-term results of DB for IC patients (IC-DB) compared with those of DB for CLI patients (CLI-DB). Methods: Patients undergoing DB from January 2009 to July 2018 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Operative details, primary and secondary patency, amputation free survival rate (AFS), and long-term exercise capacity using Barthel index were analyzed. Results: Out of 302 DB (245 patients), 49 IC-DB were performed in 43 patients: 38 males, mean age 70.3 ± 8.0 years, diabetes mellitus 51%, chronic renal failure with hemodialysis 7%. The Great saphenous vein was used in 47 limbs, the small saphenous vein in 1, and the arm vein in 1. These grafts were bypassed in a non-reversed fashion for 35 limbs, in an in-situ fashion in 9, and in a reversed fashion in 5. The mean operative time was 173 min. The mean follow-up was 25 ± 26 months. Primary and secondary patency of IC-DB was 79% and 94% at 1 year, 71% and 90% at 3 years, 65% and 90% at 5 years, which were significantly higher than those of CLI-DB (primary patency: P = .007, secondary patency: P = .025). AFS of IC-DB and CLI-DB was 100% and 77% at 1 year, 93% and 52% at 3 years, and 90% and 43% at 5 years (IC-DB vs. CLI-DB, p < .0001). Barthel index of IC-DB unchanged at discharge (median 100) and at the last visit (median 100), showing daily activity was maintained adequately. Conclusions: DB could offer a promising approach for patients with IC because of durable graft patency, acceptable AFS, and maintenance of daily activity.

Repetitive bypass and revisions with extensions for limb salvage after multiple previous failures

Vascular ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan C Lipsitz ◽  
Frank J Veith ◽  
Neal S Cayne ◽  
John Harvey ◽  
Soo J Rhee
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Group A ◽  
Lower Extremity Ischemia ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Revascularization Procedures ◽  
Salvage Rate

The optimal treatment of patients facing imminent amputation after multiple (≥2) failed prior ipsilateral bypasses is unclear. We analyzed a group of patients undergoing multiple lower extremity bypasses for limb salvage to assess the utility of attempting multiple revascularizations. From 1990 to 2005, 105 revascularization procedures were performed in 55 limbs of 54 patients with imminent limb-threatening lower extremity ischemia after failure of ≥2 prior infrainguinal bypasses in the same leg. Fifty-five operations were the third procedure (Group A) and 50 operations were the fourth or more (Group B). We compared primary/secondary patency and limb salvage rates by Society for Vascular Surgery criteria. Limb salvage rates did not differ between patients undergoing a third bypass and those undergoing four or more bypasses at one year (62 versus 65%, NS) or at three years (58 versus 61%, NS). Secondary patency was not different between groups (76 versus 76%, P = NS) at one and three years (71 versus 70%, NS). Primary patency also did not differ between the two groups, at one year (24 versus 35%, NS), or at three years (11 versus 15%, NS). No differences were observed in morbidity and mortality rates between the groups. In conclusion, the likelihood of success of repetitive limb revascularization was unrelated to the number of previous failures. The expected incremental failure rate with each successive bypass was not found. These results, coupled with the three-year limb salvage rate of over 50% in patients who otherwise would have required amputation, lend support to aggressive use of limb revascularization in selected patients even after two or more failed bypasses.

scholarly journals Are femorodistal bypass grafts for acute limb ischemia worthwhile?

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-300
Author(s):  
Nader Khandanpour ◽  
Felicity J. Meyer ◽  
Lily Choy ◽  
Jane Skinner ◽  
Matthew P. Armon
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Bypass Surgery ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Salvage Rate ◽  
Bypass Grafts ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Vein Grafts ◽  
Salvage Rate

Background: It has been shown that autogenous veins are associated with the best limb salvage rates for femorodistal bypass surgery. However, in emergency settings, when an autogenous vein is unavailable, use of synthetic graft material or amputation is a critical decision to make. Objective: To assess the appropriateness of femorodistal bypass grafts for acute limb ischemia in emergency settings. Methods: Patients who underwent emergent bypass and elective femorodistal bypass surgery between 1996 and 2006 were reviewed retrospectively in a single center. Results: There were 147 patients of which 84 had elective and 63 had emergent bypass. The graft patency rates for elective admissions were 44 and 25% vs. 25 and 23% for admissions for acute femorodistal graft surgery at 2 and 4 years, respectively (p < 0.004). Admissions for acute ischemia who were treated with prosthetic grafts had a primary patency of 24 vs. 27% for vein grafts at 2 years and 24 vs. 23% at 4 years (p = 0.33). In the acute femorodistal grafts group, primary patency at 2 years for vein and prosthetic grafts was 27 and 24% as compared to 42 and 32% for electives. These values for cumulative limb salvage rates for elective bypasses were 73 and 63% as compared to 52% at both time points in the acute femorodistal graft group (p < 0.004). In emergency settings, the limb salvage rate for acute femorodistal bypass with prosthetic grafts was 38%, and for vein grafts it was 62% at both time points (p = 0.08). Conclusion: The long term limb salvage rate of 38% suggests that emergent femorodistal revascularization is worthwhile.

Omniflow II biosynthetic grafts versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for infrainguinal bypass surgery. A single-center retrospective analysis

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110298
Author(s):  
Bart CT van de Laar ◽  
Hugo C van Heusden ◽  
Pieternel CM Pasker-de Jong ◽  
Vincent van Weel
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Bypass Surgery ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Knee Surgery ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene ◽  
Infrainguinal Bypass ◽  
Omniflow Ii

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of Omniflow II biosynthetic vascular grafts as compared to synthetic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts in infrainguinal bypass surgery. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational study was performed reviewing patients with critical limb ischemia who underwent infrainguinal bypass surgery between 2014 and 2018. Patients characteristics, graft characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected. Patency rates were compared using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Results: Sixty bypasses were performed in 57 patients. For above-knee surgery, six were Omniflow and 13 were synthetic. For below-knee surgery, 19 were Omniflow and 22 were synthetic. Patient characteristics between groups were similar. However, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scores were higher in the Omniflow group as compared to ePTFE (88% was ASA 3 or higher versus 60%; p = 0.018). Furthermore, wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) composite scores were higher in the Omniflow group ( p = 0.0001). There was a trend toward more active infection at time of surgery in the Omniflow group (40 vs 22.9%, p = 0.15). At 1 year, primary patency rates were 60.0% versus 46.9% for above-knee Omniflow versus ePTFE grafts, respectively ( p = 0.72). Secondary patency rates were 80.0% versus 82.5% ( p = 0.89), and limb salvage rates were 83.3% versus 100% ( p = 0.14). For below-knee surgery, 1- and 2-year primary patency rates in Omniflow versus ePTFE grafts were 36.0% versus 41.8% ( p = 0.60) and 36.0% versus 31.1% ( p = 0.87). Secondary patency rates were 66.8% versus 75.2% at 1 year ( p = 0.53) and 58.8% versus 48.3% ( p = 0.77) at 2 years. Below-knee limb salvage rates for Omniflow versus ePTFE after 2 years were 88.0% versus 68.3% ( p = 0.28), respectively. Aneurysmal degeneration occurred in 2/25 (8%) in the Omniflow group and 0/35 (0%) in the ePTFE group. Bypass infections occurred in 2/25 (8%) in the Omniflow group and 0/35 (0%) in the ePTFE group ( p = 0.09). Conclusion: Omniflow bypasses were more commonly implanted in patients with higher limb infection rate as confirmed with a higher adapted WIfI score. A trend toward a higher infection rate of Omniflow grafts was observed but not statistically significant. Graft infection rates were relatively low and treatable with antibiotics. No significant difference in graft performance was observed. The choice between the two studied grafts remains based on surgeon’s preference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document