Behavioral Training by Paraprofessionals for Families of Developmentally Disabled Persons

AAESPH Review ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark B. Mendelsohn

An innovative system to deliver behavioral services was developed to extend a residential facility's community outreach and provide an alternative to institutionalization. The successful implementation of this program suggests a way to combine clinical service and staff training at the bachelor-technician career ladder step in psychology and related disciplines. Specifically, a team of behavior technicians delivered the skills of a mental retardation center to families of disabled children and adults formerly beyond the center's range. Parents were taught specific modification procedures to lessen the likelihood of disruptive behavior and to hasten the acquisition of new developmental skills by their children.

AAESPH Review ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Wehman ◽  
Adelle Renzaglia ◽  
Richard Schutz

This paper is a behavioral analysis of learning and behavior problems which may be expected of severely developmentally disabled persons in vocational settings. The behavioral analysis includes three major sections: (1) a categorization and description of primary problems encountered by a severely handicapped population, (2) a logically arranged hierarchy of behavioral procedures which can be used to treat different types of problems, and (3) a general set of management strategies. It is recommended that the hierarchy of behavioral procedures be empirically validated.


1989 ◽  
Vol 64 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1213-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Atlas

26 children with diagnoses of autism and 22 children with diagnoses of childhood schizophrenia or a variant thereof were compared on the variable of winter birth. Analyses showed that autistic children had a higher proportion of winter births than schizophrenic children. These findings are related to other research linking winter birth to negative-syndrome adult schizophrenia.


1980 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 95-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary M Riordan ◽  
Brian A Iwata ◽  
Marianne K Wohl ◽  
Jack W Finney

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 182-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Paul Burtner ◽  
Jack S. Jones ◽  
Donald R. McNeal ◽  
Debra W. Low

Author(s):  
Salathiel Kendrick Allwood ◽  
Susan Mc Laren ◽  
Robert Pettignano

1987 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Weber

Responsible relative liability laws exist to shift some of the cost of care of residentially placed handicapped children from the state to the children's parents. Because residential placement of handicapped children, particularly developmentally disabled children, would not be undertaken but for the need to teach these children life skills, the Education for the Handicapped Act would dictate that these placements be free of cost to parents. Recently, the courts have resolved the tension between the preexisting state-responsible relative laws and the Education for the Handicapped Act. Ruling in favor of the parents, they have invalidated the responsible relative charges. This article describes the conflict, its resolution in the recent case Parks v. Pavkovic, and some of the implications of that decision.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document