An Uncommon Cleft Subtype of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2008 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Yamanishi ◽  
C. Kobayashi ◽  
I. Tsujimoto ◽  
H. Koizumi ◽  
S. Miya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crucial Role ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
First Year ◽  
Maxillary Growth ◽  
Palatal Development

The finding that the vomer plays a crucial role in maxillary growth suggests that the bilateral cleft configuration of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), in which the vomer is detached from the non-cleft-side secondary hard palate, negatively influences palatal development, and this hypothesis was tested. Sixty persons with complete UCLP, including those with the vomer detached from (n = 30, b-UCLP) and attached to (n = 30, u-UCLP) the secondary hard palate, were analyzed morphologically, with the use of cast models taken at 10 days, 3 mos, and 12 mos of age. The anterio-posterior palatal length at 12 mos of age in those with b-UCLP was significantly shorter than that in those with u-UCLP, by 8.7% (p < 0.05). In addition, palatal width development in the first year in those with b-UCLP was also significantly retarded. These results suggest that the uncommon bilateral cleft subtype in UCLP should be included in the cleft classification.

Two-Stage Palate Repair with Delayed Hard Palate Closure Is Related to Favorable Maxillary Growth in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 1503-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
I-Ying Yang ◽  
Ruby Wang ◽  
Claudia Yun ◽  
Chiung-Shing Huang
Keyword(s):  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Maxillary Growth

Maxillary Growth in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients, With and Without Vomerine Flap Closure of the Hard Palate at the Time of Lip Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1205-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Hay ◽  
Brijesh Patel ◽  
Priya Haria ◽  
Brian Sommerlad
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Study Support ◽  
Maxillary Growth ◽  
Flap Closure ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Objective: To assess the midterm effect on maxillary growth of vomerine flap (VF) closure of the hard palate, at the time of lip repair. Design: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected nonrandomized data. Interventions: Consecutive participants with a unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) were operated on, at 3 months of age, by the same surgeon. They were divided into 2 groups, those who had a VF and those who did not (non-VF). Setting: Participants were treated at 2 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants: Twenty-eight participants in the VF group and 24 participants in the non-VF group attended follow-up at 10 years of age. Main Outcome Measures: Standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken at 10 years. Following tracing and digitization, parameters to assess the maxillary growth were analyzed. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the anterior–posterior or vertical skeletal cephalometric parameters. Conclusions: The results of this study support the statement that VF repair does not significantly affect maxillary growth in patients with a UCLP, when assessed cephalometrically at 10 years of age. It should be noted that at this age, growth is not yet complete.

Vomer flap for hard palate repair is related to favorable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1269-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Ying-Hsin Lee ◽  
Ruby Wang ◽  
Chiung-Shing Huang ◽  
Philip Kuo-Ting Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Maxillary Growth ◽  
Vomer Flap

Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: maxillary growth at eight years of age

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annelise Küseler ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Agneta Marcusson ◽  
Arja Heliövaara ◽  
Agneta Karsten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Common Method ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Surgical Method ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
The Common ◽  
Maxillary Growth

Summary Objectives To assess differences in craniofacial growth at 8 years of age according to the different protocols for primary cleft surgery in the Scandcleft project. Design and setting Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCT) involving 10 centres, including non-syndromic Caucasians with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). In Trial 1, a common surgical method (1a) with soft palate closure at 3–4 months of age and hard palate closure at 12 months of age was tested against similar surgery but with hard palate repair at 36 months (delayed hard palate closure) (1b). In Trial 2, the common method (2a) was tested against simultaneous closure of both hard and soft palate at 1 year (2c). In Trial 3, the common method (3a) was tested against hard palate closure together with lip closure at 3 months of age and soft palate closure at 1 year of age (3d). Participants were randomly allocated by use of a dice. Operator blinding was not possible but all raters of all outcomes were blinded. Subjects and methods The total number of participating patients at 8 years of age was 429. Lateral cephalograms (n = 408) were analysed. The cephalometric angles SNA and ANB were chosen for assessing maxillary growth for this part of the presentation. Results Within each trial (Trial 1a/1b, Trial 2a/2c, and Trial 3a/3d), there was no difference in cephalometric values between the common and the local arm. There were no statistically significant differences in the SNA and ANB angles between the common arm in Trial 1a (mean SNA 77.8, mean ANB 2.6) and Trial 2a (mean SNA 79.8, mean ANB 3.6) and no difference between Trial 1a and Trial 3a, but a statistical difference could be seen between Trial 2a and Trial 3a (mean SNA 76.9, mean ANB 1.7). However, the confidence interval was rather large. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were within acceptable range. Conclusions The timing and the surgical method is not of major importance as far as growth outcomes (SNA and ANB) in UCLP are concerned. Registration ISRCTN29932826 Protocol The protocol was not published before trial commencement.

Maxillary Growth Controversies after Two-Stage Palatal Repair with Delayed Hard Palate Closure in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Perspectives from Literature and Personal Experience

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Friede
Keyword(s):  
Personal Experience ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Maxillary Growth ◽  
Palatal Surgery

Objective: To analyze published papers dealing with delayed hard palate repair within a two-stage palatal surgery protocol in treatment of cleft lip and palate. Timing of the procedures, methods used, as well as growth results were considered. Method: By utilizing this information in relation to knowledge about normal maxillary development, efforts were made to explain differences in growth outcome between different investigations. Particularly, follow-up reports of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with records up to at least 10 years of age were studied. Results: Most papers reported an excellent or very good maxillary growth outcome after their delayed hard palate closure protocols. Where unsatisfactory results were published, reasonable explanations were found accounting for why the method had failed the expectation of good maxillary growth. Conclusion: Based on the published reports and the experience from a cleft team where the studied protocol has been practiced since 1975, recommendation for method as well as timing for the two-stage protocol is laid out in some detail.

The Relationship Between Maxillary Growth and Speech in Children With a Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate at 5 Years of Age

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110106
Author(s):  
Matthew Fell ◽  
Jibby Medina ◽  
Kate Fitzsimons ◽  
Miriam Seifert ◽  
Anne Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Poor Growth ◽  
History Of ◽  
Dental Models ◽  
Maxillary Growth ◽  
Growth Scores ◽  
Outcomes For Children ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Normal Speech

Objective: This study sought to investigate the association between maxillary growth and speech outcomes for children with a repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) at 5 years of age. Participants: In all, 521 children (180 females and 341 males) with a nonsyndromic complete UCLP, born between 2007 and 2012 in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland were included in this study. Outcome Measures: Maxillary growth was analyzed using dental models scored by the 5-Year-Olds’ index, and perceptual speech analyses were scored by the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech – Augmented rating. Results: Forty-one percent of the children achieved good maxillary growth (scores 1 and 2 on 5-Year-Old’ index). Fifty percent of the children achieved normal speech (achieving UK speech standard 1). Maxillary growth was not found to have an impact on speech outcome when described by the 3 UK National Cleft Lip and Palate Speech Audit Outcome Standards. Analysis according to individual speech parameters showed dentalizations to be less prevalent in children with good maxillary growth compared to fair and poor growth ( P = .001). The remaining speech parameters within resonance, nasal airflow, and articulation categories were not significantly associated with maxillary growth. Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest that children with a history of complete UCLP, who have poor maxillary growth, are not at a higher risk of having major speech errors compared to children with good or fair maxillary growth at 5 years of age.

scholarly journals Cleft Maxillary Hypoplasia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1675-1702
Author(s):  
Philip Mathew ◽  
Mustafa. K ◽  
Paul Mathai
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Congenital Defect ◽  
Individualized Treatment ◽  
Maxillary Hypoplasia ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Detailed Evaluation

AbstractCleft lip and palate patients are born with a challenging deformity that requires multiple surgical interventions in order to reach functional and esthetic harmony. Mid face deficiency in cleft patients is a challenging clinical problem very often encountered in the management of this congenital defect. Cleft maxillary hypoplasia can be attributed to the inherited traits, acquired traits and Induced traits. CLP patients usually present with symptoms varying from malocclusion, retrusion of midface, and a narrow hard palate. A detailed evaluation and individualized treatment planning is of utmost importance in dealing with these patients. Treatment involves the contribution from both the orthodontist and the craniofacial team. The goals for the treatment for cleft maxillary hypoplasia are improvement of aesthetic deficits as well as correction of malocclusion.

Hospitalization, Breast-Milk Feeding, and Growth in Infants with Cleft Palate and Cleft Lip and Palate Born in Denmark

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 628-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa H. V. Smedegaard ◽  
Dorthe R. N. Marxen ◽  
Jette H. V. Moes ◽  
Eva N. Glassou ◽  
Cand Scientsan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Milk ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
First Year ◽  
Health Visitors ◽  
Facial Clefts ◽  
Growth References ◽  
First Year Of Life ◽  
Milk Feeding

Objective: To evaluate if the duration of postpartum hospitalization, duration of breast-milk feeding, and growth during the first year of life in infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and cleft palate (CP) are comparable to infants without facial clefts. Design: Prospective data collection using a registration chart developed by the authors. Setting: Special health care of infants with CLP/CP born in Denmark. Participants: All mature infants with CLP/CP born in 2003 and 2004 were included. Of 165 infants, 115 participated in the study. Intervention: In Denmark, parents of children with CLP/CP receive counseling. This counseling is managed by specially trained health visitors/nurses and is initiated at birth. The counseling seeks to support parents’ confidence in having an infant with CLP/CP and to initiate a relationship between the infant and the parents. Main Outcome Measures: Duration of postpartum hospitalization, duration of breast-milk feeding, and weight and length at birth, 5 months of age, and 12 months of age. Results: Hospitalization was 4 days and comparable to that of infants without CLP/CP. The infants with CLP/CP received breast milk but for a shorter period compared with infants without CLP/CP. Weights at birth, 5 months of age, and 12 months of age were identical with Danish growth references. Conclusion: The authors find the results satisfactory and believe that the counseling provided by the health visitors/nurses plays a part in the results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document