The Role of Doppler Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and Conventional Angiography in Detection of Peripheral Arterial Disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 154431672110303
Author(s):  
Sayan Sarkar ◽  
Shyam Mohan ◽  
Shakthi Parvathy
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
P Value ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

The purpose of this study is to analyze how accurate duplex ultrasonography using color Doppler and computed tomography (CT) angiography are in detection of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in comparison with the Gold Standard of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). This is a single-center prospective, analytical study done on patients with symptoms of PAD referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis of Medical Trust Hospital (n = 53). All patients were imaged with color Doppler, CT angiography, and DSA. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) ratio was calculated by Doppler ultrasound, and the percentage stenosis for the same vascular segments was calculated using CT angiography and DSA. To test the statistical significance between the results, chi-square test was used. A P value <.05 indicates statistical significance. The PSV ratio for each grade—normal (<1.5), mild (1.5-2.8), moderate (2.9-4.9), and severe (≥5)—and the percentage of stenosis for each grade observed on CT angiography—normal (<20% stenosis), mild (20%-49% stenosis), moderate (50%-74% stenosis), severe (75%-99% stenosis), and total occlusion (100% stenosis)—were found to be highly sensitive and specific with good positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy level when compared with DSA with narrow confidence intervals for each range. The P value was <.001 for both color Doppler and CT angiography. Computed tomography angiography can be an effective tool as an alternative to DSA for gradation of stenosis if the artifacts resulting from vascular calcification can be avoided. Duplex ultrasonography can be utilized for gradation of stenosis by using the value of PSV ratio and spectral pattern together. However, it can only act as an adjunct to CT angiography because it is incapable of imaging the full length of the arterial segments in 1 frame.

Audible handheld Doppler ultrasound determines reliable and inexpensive exclusion of significant peripheral arterial disease

Vascular ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 622-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Alavi ◽  
R Gary Sibbald ◽  
Reza Nabavizadeh ◽  
Farnaz Valaei ◽  
Pat Coutts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Ankle Brachial Pressure Index ◽  
Diagnostic Reliability ◽  
Pressure Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Objective To determine the accuracy of audible arterial foot signals with an audible handheld Doppler ultrasound for identification of significant peripheral arterial disease as a simple, quick, and readily available bedside screening tool. Methods Two hundred consecutive patients referred to an interprofessional wound care clinic underwent audible handheld Doppler ultrasound of both legs. As a control and comparator, a formal bilateral lower leg vascular study including the calculation of Ankle Brachial Pressure Index and toe pressure (TP) was performed at the vascular lab. Diagnostic reliability of audible handheld Doppler ultrasound was calculated versus Ankle Brachial Pressure Index as the gold standard test. Results A sensitivity of 42.8%, a specificity of 97.5%, negative predictive value of 94.10%, positive predictive value of 65.22%, positive likelihood ratio of 17.52, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.59. The univariable logistic regression model had an area under the curve of 0.78. There was a statistically significant difference at the 5% level between univariable and multivariable area under the curves of the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial models ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Audible handheld Doppler ultrasound proved to be a reliable, simple, rapid, and inexpensive bedside exclusion test of peripheral arterial disease in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

scholarly journals Comparison of Color Doppler and computed tomography angiography (CTA) in arterial disease in patients with lower limb ischemia.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1381-1391
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zakir ◽  
Anjum Tazeen ◽  
Faisal Nadeem Khan ◽  
Mehreen Fatima ◽  
Javed Tauqir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lower Limb Ischemia ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of color Doppler ultrasound with computed tomography angiography in patients with lower limb ischemia and to assess the severity of stenosis. Study Design: Cross Sectional Analytical study. Setting: Shalamar Hospital, Lahore. Period: May 2020 to October 2020. Material & Methods: Data were collected according to the Age, Height, Weight, BMI, Duration of diabetes, Total Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, Triglyceride, Gender, Socioeconomic status, Diabetes, Hypertension, Stenosis, Collateral, calcification. Sample size of46 patients were included in this research comprising 32 males (69.6%) and 14 females (30.4%).Data entry and analysis will be done by using SPSS version-23. Results: Total numbers of 46 patients were included in this research comprising 32 males (69.6%) and 14 females (30.4%). According to the result analysis 34 patients had shown peripheral arterial disease at color Doppler and 12 patients had not shown peripheral arterial disease at color doppler. 38 patients had shown peripheral arterial disease at CTA and 8 patients had not shown peripheral arterial disease at CTA. Conclusion: This study concludes that computed tomography angiography for detection of peripheral arterial disease as the gold standard, MDCT angiography shows higher sensitivity (82.6%) than color-coded Doppler ultrasonography (73.9%) in the assessment of peripheral arterial disease.

scholarly journals Extremely elevated lipoprotein (a) as an independent risk factor for peripheral arterial disease in large patient cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R Poudel ◽  
S Kirana ◽  
D Stoyanova ◽  
K.P Mellwig ◽  
D Hinse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
P Value ◽  
Lipoprotein A ◽  
Large Patient ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Revascularization Therapy ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Background Elevated lipoprotein (a) [LP (a)] levels are an independent, genetic, and causal factor for cardiovascular disease and associated with myocardial infarction (MI). Although the association between circulating levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established, its role in risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains unclear. PAD affects over 236 million individuals and follows ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) as the third leading cause of atherosclerotic cardiovascular morbidity worldwide. LP (a) is genetically determined, stable throughout life and yet refractory to drug therapy. While 30 mg/dl is considered the upper normal value for LP (a) in central Europe, extremely high LP (a) levels (&gt;150mg/dl) are rare in the general population. The aim of our study was to analyse the correlation between lipoprotein (a) [LP (a)] levels and an incidence of PAD in high-risk patients. Patients and methods We reviewed the LP (a) concentrations of 52.898 consecutive patients admitted to our cardiovascular center between January 2004 and December 2014. Of these, 579 patients had LP (a) levels above 150 mg/dl (mean 181.45±33.1mg/dl). In the control collective LP (a) was &lt;30mg/dl (n=350). Other atherogenic risk factors in this group were HbA1c 6.58±1.65%, low density lipoprotein (LDL) 141.99±43.76 mg/dl, and body mass index 27.81±5.61. 54.40% were male, 26.07% were smokers, 93.2% had hypertension, and 24% had a family history of cardiovascular diseases. More than 82.6% were under statins. The mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 69.13±24.8 ml/min [MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease)]. Results 45.00% (n=261) of the patients with LP (a) &gt;150mg/dl had PAD. The prevalence of PAD in patients with LP (a) &lt;30mg/dl in our control collective was 15.8%. (P- Value 0.001). Patients with LP (a) &gt;150mg/dl had a significantly increased risk for PAD (Odds ratio 4.36, 95% CI 2.94–6.72, p: 0.001). 19.1% of patients were re-vascularized by percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) and 7.09% of patients had to undergo peripheral vascular bypass (PVB). Mean LP (a) level in patients with PAD was 182.6±31.61. Conclusion Elevated LP (a) levels above 150 mg/dl are associated with a significantly increased risk of PAD in our collective and it confirms our hypothesis. Over one fourth of these patients had severe PAD and requiring revascularization therapy. We need more prospective studies to confirm our findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document