scholarly journals Idiopathic intracranial hypertension with stenosis of a solitary occipital venous sinus treated with stenting

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-667
Author(s):  
Ali Al Balushi ◽  
Cristiano Oliveira ◽  
Athos Patsalides
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Ophthalmological Examination ◽  
Opening Pressure ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Occipital Sinus ◽  
Nasal Defect

A 47-year-old live kidney-donor woman presented with headaches and blurred vision. Neuro-ophthalmological examination demonstrated papilledema and right eye inferior nasal defect. Brain MRV showed no sinus thrombosis but solitary right venous sinus draining the torcular Herophili to right jugular bulb. Lumbar puncture revealed elevated CSF opening pressure of 40 cm H2O with normal composition. She was diagnosed with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). She did not tolerate medical management and declined CSF diversion surgery. Cerebral angiography and venography showed venous outflow drainage from torcular Herophili through a solitary occipital sinus which has distal severe stenosis and pressure gradient of 10 mmHg. Balloon angioplasty and stenting of the occipital sinus were performed. Post-stenting, the stenosis and pressure gradient resolved. At 3-months follow-up, her symptoms and papilledema had resolved and CSF opening pressure was normal at 15 cm H2O. Aberrant cerebral venous anatomy may cause IIH and can be treatable with neuroendovascular techniques.

Abstract 167: Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Cerebral Venous Sinus Stenosis Treated by Stenting

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Chen ◽  
Liqun Jiao ◽  
Wenbo Zhao ◽  
Yuchuan Ding ◽  
Hongqi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Stenosis Rate ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Objective: To explore the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus stenosis (CVSS) in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), and to evaluate the efficacy and risk of venous sinus stenting treatment for CVSS. Methods: 40 patients with refractory IIH complicated with CVSS underwent examination with magnetic resonance venography (MRV), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and direct retrograde cerebral venography and manometry to confirm morphologic features of IlH and measure venous pressure.The CSF pressure on lumbar puncture ranged from 250 to 500 mmH 2 O with normal composition. All patients had headache, and funduscopic examination demonstrated papilledema for all patients. 28 patients who showed severe stenosis of venous sinuses with the pressure gradient across the stenosis >100 mmH 2 O were treated with venous sinus stenting and were followed-up for more than 12 months.Intrasinus pressures were recorded before and after the procedure and correlated with clinical outcome during the follow-up period. Results: Sinus stenting angioplasty was successful in all 28 patients.In all patients venous sinus stenosis was improved after stenting procedure (the residual stenosis rate<20%) and intrasinus pressure was reduced (the pressure gradient vanished or<20 mmH 2 O ).The clinical symptoms in all the patients were improved or disappeared at discharge and intracranial pressures were normalized within 3 months after the procedure.During the follow-up period of (16.3±11) months (range 12 to 36 months),no patient had recurrence of IIH.In all cases, DSA or MRV was performed at 12-month follow-up and demonstrated the absence of sinus thrombosis or in-stent stenosis. Conclusions: Patients with refractory IIH should be assessed for CVSS. MRV or DSA was recommended for these patients as a routine work-up.Cerebral venography and manometry are helpful to evaluate the relation between venous outflow obstruction and intracranial hypertension.If severe CVSS is presented in patients who experienced medical treatment failure, endovascular stent placement could be an alternative to classic surgical approaches. Additional randomized and controlled clinical research is deserved.

Abstract 1122‐000232: The Importance of Performing Venous Pressure Measurements Following Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Sigmoid Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
The Right

Introduction : Although venous sinus stenting is an established treatment for medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension, a subset of patients shows little or no improvement of symptoms after stenting. While this could be related to a number of factors, failure to sufficiently address the pressure gradient is one that can be recognized during the treatment procedure. We describe two patients who had a persistent venous pressure gradient after stent placement. Once identified, a second stent was placed with subsequent resolution of the pressure gradient. Methods : This retrospective chart review identified patients at a single institution who underwent venous sinus stenting and required immediate placement of a second venous sinus stent for a persistent pressure gradient. Results : Two patients with refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension underwent cerebral angiography with venous manometry. In the first patient, unilateral venous sinus stenosis was present with a maximum pressure of 50 mmHg, which only decreased to 30 mmHg after placement of a right transverse‐sigmoid sinus stent. Subsequent manometry revealed a persistent gradient between the superior sagittal sinus and the right transverse sinus, which resolved after placement of a second stent in this location. In the second patient, bilateral stenosis was observed at the transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction; the maximum venous pressure was 40 mmHg, and a gradient of 30 mmHg was measured at the right transverse‐sigmoid junction, where a venous sinus stent was placed. Venous sinus pressure measurements performed immediately after the stent placement demonstrated a persistent pressure gradient of 20 mmHg in the contralateral transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction, which resolved after contralateral stent placement. Both patients showed sustained improvement in their symptoms at 1 year follow up. Conclusions : In some patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and venous sinus stenosis, a single stent may not sufficiently reduce the pressure gradient. A second stent may be required; however, this is only detectable with post‐stent pressure measurements. Performing manometry after stent placement should be routinely performed in order to detect persistent venous pressure gradient.

Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children utilizing venous sinus stenting

2020 ◽  
pp. 159101992097623
Author(s):  
Justin Schwarz ◽  
Ali Al Balushi ◽  
Sri Sundararajan ◽  
Marc Dinkin ◽  
Cristiano Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Persistent Symptoms

Background Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is an accepted and minimally invasive treatment for adult idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) associated with lateral sinus stenosis (LSS). The efficacy and safety of venous sinus stenting (VSS) in children with IIH has not been established. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of IIH patients 18 years of age or younger with LSS treated with VSS at our institution. Included patients have fulminant disease course or are refractory or intolerant to medical management. Results Eight patients were identified; 4 males and 4 females. Mean age is 13.4 years (range 4–18). All patients had severe headaches, 5 had blurred vision, 3 had diplopia and 3 had pulsatile tinnitus. Papilledema was present in 4 patients. Three patients had prior surgical procedures. Four patients were intolerant to medical management, 3 were refractory and 1 had fulminant course. Cerebral venography demonstrated severe stenosis of the dominant sinus in 6 patients and of bilateral co-dominant sinuses in 2 patients. Six patients had intrinsic stenosis and 2 had extrinsic stenosis. Venous sinus stenting (VSS) resulted in improvement of symptoms, papilledema and normalization of CSF opening pressure in 7 patients. No immediate complications were observed. Mean follow-up period is 21 months (range 6–42). Two patients required re-stenting; one responded well and the other had persistent symptoms and underwent subsequent surgical procedures of CSF diversion, suboccipital decompression and duraplasty which were also ineffective. Conclusion VSS may provide a viable option for pediatric IIH patients who are intolerant to medication, have failed conservative management or prior surgical interventions, or present with fulminant disease.

Pattern of pressure gradient alterations after venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension predicts stent-adjacent stenosis: a proposed classification system

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Raper ◽  
Thomas J Buell ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
Ching-Jen Chen ◽  
Robert M Starke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Iii

ObjectiveVenous sinus stenting (VSS) is a safe and effective treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with angiographic venous sinus stenosis. However, predictors of stent-adjacent stenosis (SAS) remain poorly defined.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 47 patients with IIH and intracranial venous stenosis who underwent VSS with pre- and post-stent venography. Patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were reviewed. Changes in pressure gradient after VSS were classified according to pattern of gradient resolution into types I–III.ResultsType I gradient resolution, in which mean venous pressure (MVP) in the transverse sinus (TS) decreases towards MVP in the sigmoid sinus (SS), occurred in 18 patients (38.3%). Type II gradient resolution pattern, in which SS MVP increases towards that in the TS, occurred in 7patients (14.9%). Type III pattern, in which MVP equilibrates to a middle value, occurred in 22patients (46.8%). SAS occurred in 0%, 28.6%, and 22.7% of patients in types I, II and III, respectively. Compared with patients with type I gradient resolution, SAS was more common in those with type II (p=0.0181) and type III (p=0.0306) patterns.ConclusionsThe pattern of change in the trans-stenosis venous pressure gradient may be predictive of SAS and is a useful tool for classifying the response of the venous obstruction to stenting. A type I pattern appears to represent the ideal response to VSS. Some patients with type II and III changes, particularly if they have other predictors of recurrent stenosis, may benefit from longer initial stent constructs.

Venous sinus stenting in patients without idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R Levitt ◽  
Felipe C Albuquerque ◽  
Bradley A Gross ◽  
Karam Moon ◽  
Ashutosh P Jadhav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Congenital Hydrocephalus ◽  
Pulsatile Tinnitus ◽  
Venous Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus

BackgroundVenous sinus stenting is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and venous sinus stenosis.ObjectiveTo determine the usefulness of venous sinus stenting in the treatment of patients with symptomatic venous sinus stenosis without a diagnosis of IIH.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database of patients undergoing venous sinus stenting between January 2008 and February 2016. Patients with acute dural venous sinus thrombosis, arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous malformation, or IIH were excluded. Clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological information was recorded.ResultsNine patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent venous sinus stenting for symptomatic dural venous sinus stenosis. Reasons for treatment included isolated unilateral pulsatile tinnitus (n=1), congenital hydrocephalus (n=2), unilateral pulsatile tinnitus following prior venous sinus thrombosis (n=1), acquired hydrocephalus following dural sinus thrombosis (n=2), meningitis (n=2) and tumor invasion into the dural venous sinus (n=1). Six patients underwent lumbar puncture or shunt tap, and all of these patients had elevated intracranial pressure. All stenoses were located in the transverse sinus, transverse–sigmoid junction and/or jugular bulb, and all were treated with self-expanding bare-metal stents. At follow-up, clinical symptoms had resolved in all but two patients, both of whom had congenital hydrocephalus and pre-existing shunts. There was no significant in-stent stenosis, and patients with ophthalmological follow-up demonstrated improvement of papilledema.ConclusionsDural venous sinus stenting may be an effective treatment for patients with symptomatic venous sinus stenosis without IIH in carefully selected cases, but may not be effective in resolving the symptoms of congenital hydrocephalus.

scholarly journals Eye-Neck Integrated Ultrasound in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Liu ◽  
Yingqi Xing ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Xiaorui Ji ◽  
Jiaojiao Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Hemodynamic Characteristics ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Increased Icp

Background: The clinical presentation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) overlaps with that of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), but no screening tool exists. We investigated the role of eye-neck integrated ultrasound in the diagnosis and differentiation of IIH and CVST.Methods: Twenty IIH patients, 30 CVST patients, and 40 healthy controls were retrospectively analyzed. The ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and hemodynamic characteristics of the internal jugular veins (IJVs) were recorded. The cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure was measured after ultrasonic examination.Results: The ONSD was significantly larger in IIH patients than in controls (4.71 ± 0.41 vs. 3.93 ± 0.24 mm, p &lt; 0.001). The ONSD cut-off for IIH diagnosis was 4.25 mm (AUC = 0.978; 95% CI: 0.95–1.0, p &lt; 0.001, sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 93%). In the CVST group, 22 (73.3%) patients had elevated intracranial pressure (ICP); the mean ONSD was significantly higher in patients with increased ICP than in those without (4.43 ± 0.33 vs. 3.95 ± 0.17 mm, p &lt; 0.001). The mean blood flow volume (BFV) was significantly reduced in CVST patients (425.17 ± 349.83 mL/min) compared to that in controls (680.37 ± 233.03 mL/min, p &lt; 0.001) and IIH patients (617.67 ± 282.96 mL/min, p = 0.008). The optimal BFV cut-off for predicting CVST was 527.28 mL/min (AUC = 0.804, 95% CI: 0.68–0.93, p &lt; 0.001, sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 78%). The velocity of the unilateral IJVs-J3 segment decreased or remained constant during deep inspiration (abnormal respiratory modulate blood flow test, ARMT) in 32.5% of controls, with no bilateral ARMT. The prevalence of bilateral ARMT was 25% in IIH patients (χ2 = 12.9, p = 0.005) and 27% in CVST patients (χ2 = 17.6, p = 0.001).Conclusion: Eye-neck integrated ultrasound is an easily available bedside technique to assess ICP and hemodynamic characteristics of IJVs. ONSD measurement can identify patients with increased ICP, and reduced IJV BFV may aid the differentiation of CVST and IIH.

scholarly journals Incidence and predictors of dural venous sinus pressure gradient in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and non-idiopathic intracranial hypertension headache patients: results from 164 cerebral venograms

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Levitt ◽  
Randall J. Hlubek ◽  
Karam Moon ◽  
M. Yashar S. Kalani ◽  
Peter Nakaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus ◽  
Cerebral Venous Pressure ◽  
Headache Patients

OBJECTIVE Cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) from dural venous sinus stenosis is implicated in headache syndromes such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). The incidence of CVPG in headache patients has not been reported. METHODS The authors reviewed all cerebral venograms with manometry performed for headache between January 2008 and May 2015. Patient demographics, headache etiology, intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements, and radiographic and manometric results were recorded. CVPG was defined as a difference ≥ 8 mm Hg by venographic manometry. RESULTS One hundred sixty-four venograms were performed in 155 patients. There were no procedural complications. Ninety-six procedures (58.5%) were for patients with IIH. The overall incidence of CVPG was 25.6% (42 of 164 procedures): 35.4% (34 of 96 procedures) in IIH patients and 11.8% (8 of 68 procedures) in non-IIH patients. Sixty procedures (36.6%) were performed in patients with preexisting shunts. Seventy-seven patients (49.7%) had procedures preceded by an ICP measurement within 4 weeks of venography, and in 66 (85.7%) of these patients, the ICP had been found to be elevated. CVPG was seen in 8.3% (n = 5) of the procedures in the 60 patients with a preexisting shunt and in 0% (n = 0) of the 11 procedures in the 77 patients with normal ICP (p < 0.001 for both). Noninvasive imaging (MR venography, CT venography) was assessed prior to venography in 112 (68.3%) of 164 cases, and dural venous sinus abnormalities were demonstrated in 73 (65.2%) of these cases; there was a trend toward CVPG (p = 0.07). Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increased likelihood of CVPG in patients with IIH (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.71–14.47) and a decreased likelihood in patients with a preexisting shunt (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.44). CONCLUSIONS CVPG is uncommon in IIH patients, rare in those with preexisting shunts, and absent in those with normal ICP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document