Abstract 1122‐000232: The Importance of Performing Venous Pressure Measurements Following Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Sigmoid Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
The Right

Introduction : Although venous sinus stenting is an established treatment for medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension, a subset of patients shows little or no improvement of symptoms after stenting. While this could be related to a number of factors, failure to sufficiently address the pressure gradient is one that can be recognized during the treatment procedure. We describe two patients who had a persistent venous pressure gradient after stent placement. Once identified, a second stent was placed with subsequent resolution of the pressure gradient. Methods : This retrospective chart review identified patients at a single institution who underwent venous sinus stenting and required immediate placement of a second venous sinus stent for a persistent pressure gradient. Results : Two patients with refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension underwent cerebral angiography with venous manometry. In the first patient, unilateral venous sinus stenosis was present with a maximum pressure of 50 mmHg, which only decreased to 30 mmHg after placement of a right transverse‐sigmoid sinus stent. Subsequent manometry revealed a persistent gradient between the superior sagittal sinus and the right transverse sinus, which resolved after placement of a second stent in this location. In the second patient, bilateral stenosis was observed at the transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction; the maximum venous pressure was 40 mmHg, and a gradient of 30 mmHg was measured at the right transverse‐sigmoid junction, where a venous sinus stent was placed. Venous sinus pressure measurements performed immediately after the stent placement demonstrated a persistent pressure gradient of 20 mmHg in the contralateral transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction, which resolved after contralateral stent placement. Both patients showed sustained improvement in their symptoms at 1 year follow up. Conclusions : In some patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and venous sinus stenosis, a single stent may not sufficiently reduce the pressure gradient. A second stent may be required; however, this is only detectable with post‐stent pressure measurements. Performing manometry after stent placement should be routinely performed in order to detect persistent venous pressure gradient.

scholarly journals Fifty shades of gradients: does the pressure gradient in venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension matter? A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 999-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron M. McDougall ◽  
Vin Shen Ban ◽  
Jeffrey Beecher ◽  
Lee Pride ◽  
Babu G. Welch
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

OBJECTIVEThe role of venous sinus stenting (VSS) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to attempt to identify subsets of patients with IIH who will benefit from VSS based on the pressure gradients of their venous sinus stenosis.METHODSMEDLINE/PubMed was searched for studies reporting venous pressure gradients across the stenotic segment of the venous sinus, pre- and post-stent pressure gradients, and clinical outcomes after VSS. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.RESULTSFrom 32 eligible studies, a total of 186 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who had favorable outcomes had higher mean pressure gradients (22.8 ± 11.5 mm Hg vs 17.4 ± 8.0 mm Hg, p = 0.033) and higher changes in pressure gradients after stent placement (19.4 ± 10.0 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 6.0 mm Hg, p = 0.006) compared with those with unfavorable outcomes. The post-stent pressure gradients between the 2 groups were not significantly different (2.8 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 2.7 ± 2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.934). In a multivariate stepwise logistic regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, CSF opening pressure, pre-stent pressure gradient, and post-stent pressure gradient, the change in pressure gradient with stent placement was found to be an independent predictor of favorable outcome (p = 0.028). Using a pressure gradient of 21 as a cutoff, 81/86 (94.2%) of patients with a gradient > 21 achieved favorable outcomes, compared with 82/100 (82.0%) of patients with a gradient ≤ 21 (p = 0.022).CONCLUSIONSThere appears to be a relationship between the pressure gradient of venous sinus stenosis and the success of VSS in IIH. A randomized controlled trial would help elucidate this relationship and potentially guide patient selection.

Correlation between angiographic stenosis and physiologic venous sinus outflow obstruction in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L West ◽  
Garret P Greeneway ◽  
Rebecca M Garner ◽  
Carol A Aschenbrenner ◽  
Jasmeet Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Arterial Stenosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Venous Phase ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Clinically Significant

IntroductionThe relationship between degree of angiographic venous sinus stenosis and the trans-stenosis pressure gradient magnitude in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is poorly understood. The present study aimed to assess the utility of angiography, venography, and non-invasive imaging (MRV or CTV) for the diagnosis and characterization of clinically significant VSS.MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed to identify patients with medically refractory IIH who were evaluated by angiography and venous manometry for the presence of VSS with associated clinically significant pressure gradient. Angiographic stenosis was measured by two independent raters using novel methodology.ResultsThirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria for the study. In total, 70% of patients had clinically significant pressure gradients and were selected for stenting. The optimal percentage stenosis for detection of a significant pressure gradient was 34% stenosis on venous phase arteriography (sensitivity 0.81 and specificity 0.91) and 31% stenosis on venography (0.92 and 0.73). For every 10% increase in stenosis, an approximate increase in pressure gradient of 3.5 mmHg is seen. MRV/CTV had a calculated sensitivity of 0.42, and a negative predictive value of 22%.ConclusionThe degree of stenosis predictive of a clinically significant pressure gradient (30–35%) in the venous sinuses is considerably lower than the arterial stenosis at which pathologic hemodynamic alterations occur. While highly predictive of a venous pressure gradient when a stenosis is identified, non-invasive imaging does not appear to be a suitable diagnostic evaluation for the purpose of ruling out clinically significant cerebral VSS.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Venous Sinus Pressures in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Patients Before and After Endovascular Stenting

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M S Raper ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
Thomas J Buell ◽  
R Webster Crowley ◽  
Robert M Starke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Hypertension ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Abstract BACKGROUND Elevated body mass index (BMI) has been correlated with worse outcomes after treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for a subset of patients with IIH and evidence of venous sinus stenosis. However, the association between BMI and the efficacy of VSS remains poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE To determine, in a retrospective cohort study, the effect of BMI on preoperative mean intracranial venous pressure (MVP) and post-VSS outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected database of patients with IIH and intracranial venous sinus stenosis who underwent VSS. Patient demographics and treatment factors, including pre- and postprocedural trans-stenosis pressure gradients, were analyzed to identify the relationship between BMI and outcomes after VSS. RESULTS Increasing BMI was significantly correlated with higher maximum MVP (P = .013) and higher trans-stenosis pressure gradient (P = .043) prior to treatment. The degrees of improvement in maximum MVP and pressure gradient after VSS were greatest for obese and morbidly obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m2). Maximum poststent MVP, clinical outcomes, and stent-adjacent stenosis requiring retreatment after VSS were not significantly associated with BMI. CONCLUSION We provide direct evidence for a positive correlation between BMI and intracranial venous pressure in patients with IIH. VSS affords a significantly greater amelioration of intracranial venous hypertension and stenosis for IIH patients with higher BMIs. As such, obesity should not be a deterrent for the use of VSS in the management of IIH.

scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Complications, Neurological Outcomes, and Radiographic Results

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
Tony Wang ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
Christopher R. Durst ◽  
R. Webster Crowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Venous Stenting ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Effective Therapeutic Option ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Introduction.Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) may result in a chronic debilitating disease. Dural venous sinus stenosis with a physiologic venous pressure gradient has been identified as a potential etiology in a number of IIH patients. Intracranial venous stenting has emerged as a potential treatment alternative.Methods. A systematic review was carried out to identify studies employing venous stenting for IIH.Results. From 2002 to 2014, 17 studies comprising 185 patients who underwent 221 stenting procedures were reported. Mean prestent pressure gradient was 20.1 mmHg (95% CI 19.4–20.7 mmHg) with a mean poststent gradient of 4.4 mmHg (95% CI 3.5–5.2 mmHg). Complications occurred in 10 patients (5.4%; 95% CI 4.7–5.4%) but were major in only 3 (1.6%). At a mean clinical follow-up of 22 months, clinical improvement was noted in 130 of 166 patients with headaches (78.3%; 95% CI 75.8–80.8%), 84 of 89 patients with papilledema (94.4%; 95% CI 92.1–96.6%), and 64 of 74 patients with visual symptoms (86.5%; 95% CI 83.0–89.9%). In-stent stenosis was noted in six patients (3.4%; 95% CI 2.5–4.3%) and stent-adjacent stenosis occurred in 19 patients (11.4%; 95% CI 10.4–12.4), resulting in restenting in 10 patients.Conclusion. In IIH patients with venous sinus stenosis and a physiologic pressure gradient, venous stenting appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option. Further studies are necessary to determine the long-term outcomes and the optimal management of medically refractory IIH.

Reductions in bilateral transverse sinus pressure gradients with unilateral transverse venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016170
Author(s):  
Anthony Larson ◽  
Lorenzo Rinaldo ◽  
John J Chen ◽  
Jeremy Cutsforth-Gregory ◽  
Amy R Theiler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Right

BackgroundVenous sinus stenting is an effective treatment for papilledema associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). It is unclear whether unilateral transverse-sigmoid sinus (TSS) stenting adequately decompresses the contralateral TSS system in cases of bilateral transverse sinus stenosis. The objective of this study was to compare changes in bilateral TSS pressure gradients following unilateral TSS stenting in a series of patients with IIH.MethodsConsecutive patients from a single institution who underwent venous sinus stenting for IIH with measurement of bilateral pressure gradients before and after stenting for IIH were enrolled. Pressure gradients in both TSS pre- and post-stenting were measured during the procedure. The TSS with the highest gradient was stented. Changes in TSS pressure gradients following stent placement were calculated for both TSS. Mean changes in pressure gradients of ipsilateral and contralateral TSS were calculated.ResultsSixteen patients with IIH who underwent TSS stenting were included. All were female. Mean age was 36.4 years. The right-sided TSS was the stented side in 12 (75.0%) patients. The mean pre-stent pressure gradient of the ipsilateral TSS was 19.3 mmHg (SD=10.8), which was reduced to a mean of 3.8 mmHg (3.4) following stent placement (P =<0.0001). On the contralateral (non-stented) side, the mean pre-stent gradient of 15.1 mmHg (7.5) was reduced to a mean of 7.8 mmHg (6.6) following stenting (P=0.006).ConclusionsThe use of a single stent provides some venous decompression of the contralateral non-stented stenosis in most cases of IIH treated with endovascular therapy.

scholarly journals Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension caused by multiple venous sinus stenoses

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudai Morisaki ◽  
Ichiro Nakagawa ◽  
Koji Omoto ◽  
Takeshi Wada ◽  
Kimihiko Kichikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Sagittal Sinus ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Cerebral Venous Pressure

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) shows symptoms by elevating intracranial pressure. Although sinus stenosis has been detected in many patients with IIH, the role of sinus stenosis in IIH remains obscure. Endovascular treatment for IIH due to transverse sinus stenosis has been frequently documented; however, IIH due to multiple sinus stenoses including the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is rare. Here, we report a case of IIH due to multiple sinus stenoses treated by sinus stenting. Case Presentation: A 47-year-old woman suffered from intractable headache with IIH presented with stenosis of the right transverse and SSS. Stent placement was carried out since intracranial hypertension and trans-stenotic cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) were presented, and her intractable headache disappeared. Conclusion: IIH can be caused by venous sinus stenoses and stent placement could be an appropriate treatment in patients who demonstrated a CVPG.

Pattern of pressure gradient alterations after venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension predicts stent-adjacent stenosis: a proposed classification system

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Raper ◽  
Thomas J Buell ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
Ching-Jen Chen ◽  
Robert M Starke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Iii

ObjectiveVenous sinus stenting (VSS) is a safe and effective treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with angiographic venous sinus stenosis. However, predictors of stent-adjacent stenosis (SAS) remain poorly defined.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 47 patients with IIH and intracranial venous stenosis who underwent VSS with pre- and post-stent venography. Patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were reviewed. Changes in pressure gradient after VSS were classified according to pattern of gradient resolution into types I–III.ResultsType I gradient resolution, in which mean venous pressure (MVP) in the transverse sinus (TS) decreases towards MVP in the sigmoid sinus (SS), occurred in 18 patients (38.3%). Type II gradient resolution pattern, in which SS MVP increases towards that in the TS, occurred in 7patients (14.9%). Type III pattern, in which MVP equilibrates to a middle value, occurred in 22patients (46.8%). SAS occurred in 0%, 28.6%, and 22.7% of patients in types I, II and III, respectively. Compared with patients with type I gradient resolution, SAS was more common in those with type II (p=0.0181) and type III (p=0.0306) patterns.ConclusionsThe pattern of change in the trans-stenosis venous pressure gradient may be predictive of SAS and is a useful tool for classifying the response of the venous obstruction to stenting. A type I pattern appears to represent the ideal response to VSS. Some patients with type II and III changes, particularly if they have other predictors of recurrent stenosis, may benefit from longer initial stent constructs.

Retrograde 3D rotational venography (3DRV) for venous sinus stent placement in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 777-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C Young ◽  
Ryan P Morton ◽  
Basavaraj V Ghodke ◽  
Michael R Levitt
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
Venous Sinuses ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus

BackgroundDural venous sinus stenting has emerged as an effective and durable treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Improved visualization of the venous sinuses can improve stent placement.MethodsWe present two cases of IIH treated with venous sinus stenting in which retrograde three-dimensional rotational venography (3DRV) provided superior anatomical details of the venous sinuses for optimal sizing and positioning of stent.ResultsComparison of pre-stent 3DRV with post-stent contrast-enhanced flat panel detector CT allowed confirmation of stent placement and the result of stenosis dilation.ConclusionThis 3DRV technique provides precise visualization of venous sinus stenosis prior to stenting without the need for arterial cerebral angiography during the treatment course.

Dural sinus stent placement for idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 538-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Kumpe ◽  
Jeffrey L. Bennett ◽  
Joshua Seinfeld ◽  
Victoria S. Pelak ◽  
Ashish Chawla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Dural Sinus ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Junction Region ◽  
Hemodynamic Deterioration

Object The use of unilateral dural sinus stent placement in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) has been described by multiple investigators. To date there is a paucity of information on the angiographic and hemodynamic outcome of these procedures. The object of this study was to define the clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic outcome of placement of unilateral dural sinus stents to treat intracranial venous hypertension in a subgroup of patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for IIH. Methods Eighteen consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of IIH were treated with unilateral stent placement in the transverse-sigmoid junction region. All patients had papilledema. All 12 female patients had headaches; 1 of 6 males had headaches previously that disappeared after weight loss. Seventeen patients had elevated opening pressures at lumbar puncture. Twelve patients had opening pressures of 33–55 cm H2O. All patients underwent diagnostic cerebral arteriography that showed venous outflow compromise by filling defects in the transverse-sigmoid junction region. All patients underwent intracranial selective venous pressure measurements across the filling defects. Follow-up arteriography was performed in 16 patients and follow-up venography/venous pressure measurements were performed in 15 patients. Results Initial pressure gradients across the filling defects ranged from 10.5 to 39 mm Hg. Nineteen stent procedures were performed in 18 patients. One patient underwent repeat stent placement for hemodynamic failure. Pressure gradients were reduced in every instance and ranged from 0 to 7 mm Hg after stenting. Fifteen of 16 patients in whom ophthalmological follow-up was performed experienced disappearance of papilledema. Follow-up arteriography in 16 patients at 5–99 months (mean 25.3 months, median 18.5 months) showed patency of all stents without in-stent restenosis. Two patients had filling defects immediately above the stent. Four other patients developed transverse sinus narrowing above the stent without filling defects. One of these patients underwent repeat stent placement because of hemodynamic deterioration. Two of the other 3 patients had hemodynamic deterioration with recurrent pressure gradients of 10.5 and 18 mm Hg. Conclusions All stents remained patent without restenosis. Stent placement is durable and successfully eliminates papilledema in appropriately selected patients. Continuing hemodynamic success in this series was 80%, and was 87% with repeat stent placement in 1 patient.

scholarly journals Incidence and predictors of dural venous sinus pressure gradient in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and non-idiopathic intracranial hypertension headache patients: results from 164 cerebral venograms

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Levitt ◽  
Randall J. Hlubek ◽  
Karam Moon ◽  
M. Yashar S. Kalani ◽  
Peter Nakaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus ◽  
Cerebral Venous Pressure ◽  
Headache Patients

OBJECTIVE Cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) from dural venous sinus stenosis is implicated in headache syndromes such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). The incidence of CVPG in headache patients has not been reported. METHODS The authors reviewed all cerebral venograms with manometry performed for headache between January 2008 and May 2015. Patient demographics, headache etiology, intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements, and radiographic and manometric results were recorded. CVPG was defined as a difference ≥ 8 mm Hg by venographic manometry. RESULTS One hundred sixty-four venograms were performed in 155 patients. There were no procedural complications. Ninety-six procedures (58.5%) were for patients with IIH. The overall incidence of CVPG was 25.6% (42 of 164 procedures): 35.4% (34 of 96 procedures) in IIH patients and 11.8% (8 of 68 procedures) in non-IIH patients. Sixty procedures (36.6%) were performed in patients with preexisting shunts. Seventy-seven patients (49.7%) had procedures preceded by an ICP measurement within 4 weeks of venography, and in 66 (85.7%) of these patients, the ICP had been found to be elevated. CVPG was seen in 8.3% (n = 5) of the procedures in the 60 patients with a preexisting shunt and in 0% (n = 0) of the 11 procedures in the 77 patients with normal ICP (p < 0.001 for both). Noninvasive imaging (MR venography, CT venography) was assessed prior to venography in 112 (68.3%) of 164 cases, and dural venous sinus abnormalities were demonstrated in 73 (65.2%) of these cases; there was a trend toward CVPG (p = 0.07). Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increased likelihood of CVPG in patients with IIH (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.71–14.47) and a decreased likelihood in patients with a preexisting shunt (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.44). CONCLUSIONS CVPG is uncommon in IIH patients, rare in those with preexisting shunts, and absent in those with normal ICP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document