scholarly journals Sequential Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: Rationale and Clinical Results

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-122
Author(s):  
R. Longo ◽  
M.R. D'Andrea ◽  
G. Gasparini
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Tamoxifen Treatment ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Hormone Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting

For the past 15 years tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant hormone therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, irrespective of nodal status and other clinicopathological parameters. Recent studies provided evidence that the optimal duration of tamoxifen treatment is 5 years. Based on the positive clinical results obtained with the administration of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the metastatic setting, several controlled clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and side effects of AIs versus standard tamoxifen also as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The results of the above studies, suggest a therapeutic advantage of AIs over tamoxifen with regard to relapse-free survival and the risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer. We review the rationale and the available clinical data on initial or sequential hormone treatment with AIs and we propose a novel scenario for possible therapeutic strategies based on the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and on the biology of each single tumor.

Adjuvant hormone therapy use in early-stage breast cancer patients insured by the New York State Medicaid program.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6031-6031
Author(s):  
R. L. Yung ◽  
M. J. Hassett ◽  
K. Chen ◽  
F. C. Gesten ◽  
P. R. Roohan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
New York ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
New York State ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Medicaid Program ◽  
Adjuvant Hormone Therapy ◽  
York State

Early-stage breast cancer patients reporting difficulty sleeping, mood issues, or pain are more likely to refuse adjuvant hormone therapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12065-e12065
Author(s):  
Christian A. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Hormone Therapy

e12065 Background: Adjuvant hormone therapy is a crucial part of the treatment for patients with early stage breast cancer and an important quality measure for programs such as QOPI and the oncology care model (OCM). However, it is not known which factors influence some patients with early stage breast cancer to decline adjuvant hormone therapy. We hypothesized that specific self-reported symptoms might impact a patient’s decision to accept or decline adjuvant hormone therapy. Methods: Patients with stage 0 or I breast cancer were identified by chart review from 2011-2016 and de-identified. On the day patients received a recommendation for adjuvant treatment the following patient reported outcome measures (PROs) were analyzed: difficulty sleeping (DS), fatigue (F), mood (M such as anxiety and depression), and pain (P) on a 0-4 symptom scale based on CTCAE v. 4. PROs were then linked with a patient’s decision to accept or decline adjuvant therapy. Results: A total of 287 patients with stage 0 (n = 80) or stage I (n = 207) breast cancer were identified. 38 stage O and 103 stage I patients had evaluable PROs on the same day a recommendation for adjuvant hormone therapy was made. Overall 18/38 (47.4%) of stage 0 patients and 90 of 103 (87.4%) of stage I patients accepted adjuvant treatment. Stage 0 patients declining adjuvant therapy reported any grade of PROs: DS (40%, n = 8), F (35%, n = 7), M (35%, n = 7), P (20%, n = 4). Stage 0 patients accepting treatment reported: DS (22%, n = 4), F (44%, n = 8), M (6%, n = 1), P (20%, n = 4). Stage I patients who declined treatment reported: DS (54%, n = 7), F (46%, n = 6), M (38%, n = 5), P (62%, n = 8). Stage I patients accepting treatment reported: DS (41%, n = 37), F (49%, n = 44), M (31%, n = 28), P (36%, n = 32). Conclusions: Early stage breast cancer patients declining adjuvant hormone therapy are more likely to self report symptoms such as difficulty sleeping, mood disturbances (anxiety, depression), and pain than those accepting treatment.

Hormonal Therapy for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
Rebecca E. Greene ◽  
Vivian Tsang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Receptor Modulator

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women. The majority of breast cancers diagnosed in postmenopausal women are hormone receptor positive and involve therapy with hormonal agents. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen-receptor modulator, has been the mainstay of hormonal therapy since the 1970s. The more recent approval and success of aromatase inhibitors, such as anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, have seen these agents move to the front line of therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-positive breast cancer in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. Fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor— downregulator, provides an additional hormonal therapy with a novel mechanism of action. This article reviews the current literature available regarding the use of these agents for postmenopausal women with early stage or advanced breast cancer.

Association of the phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor at serine 118 and 167 with prognosis in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 562-562
Author(s):  
Karin J. Beelen ◽  
Mark Opdam ◽  
Rutger H.T. Koornstra ◽  
Andrew D. Vincent ◽  
Jan Baptist Vermorken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Estrogen Therapy ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Tamoxifen Treatment ◽  
Adjuvant Tamoxifen ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Premenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Models

562 Background: The sensitivity of the estrogen receptor (ERα) to anti-estrogen therapy can be affected by phosphorylation events. In premenopausal breast cancer patients, phosphorylation of the ERα at serine 118 (ERαS118-p) is predictive for benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen. Since ERαS118-p represents the common hallmark of different signaling cascades that differ in E2 dependency, the resulting effect on estrogen sensitivity may differ between pre- and postmenopausal patients. Phosphorylation of serine 167 (ERαS167-p) has been associated with favorable disease outcome, but whether ERαS167-p can predict tamoxifen sensitivity is currently unknown. We tested the predictive value of both ERαS118-p and ERαS167-p for benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Methods: We collected primary tumor blocks from 563 ERα positive (stage I-III) postmenopausal patients who had been randomized between tamoxifen (1 to 3 years) vs. no adjuvant therapy (IKA trial). The median follow-up of patients without a recurrence event was 9.4 years. Immunohistochemistry was performed on a TMA using monoclonal antibodies for ERαS118-p and ERαS167-p. The percentage of positive nuclei was scored and a score of ≥ 10 % was considered as positive. Multivariate Cox models were used to assess hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence free interval and the interaction between these phosphorylations and tamoxifen treatment. Results: We did not find a significant interaction between either ERαS118-p (p=0.99) or ERαS167-p (p=0.44) and tamoxifen, suggesting that the relative benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients is not dependent on the presence of one of these phosphorylations. Both tamoxifen treated patients as well as control patients had a better prognosis when their tumor was positive for ERαS118-p (adjusted HR 0.60 p=0.02) or ERαS167-p (adjusted HR 0.62, p=0.02) compared to patients whose tumor did not express these ERα phosphorylations. Conclusions: In postmenopausal patients ERαS118-p and ERαS167-p are both associated with better prognosis, but do not predict differential benefit from tamoxifen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document