Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Expression of ErbB-4 in Prostate Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-185
Author(s):  
R. Ben-Yosef ◽  
D. Sarid ◽  
A. Vexler ◽  
G. Lidawi ◽  
M. Inbar ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate cytoplasmic and nuclear ErbB-4 expression in prostate cancer specimens and its association with outcome. Basic procedures Specimens of 50 prostate cancer patients were investigated for ErbB-4 overexpression using immunohistochemistry staining. Cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was graded as 0–3 according to its intensity. The prognostic parameters were tumor stage, PSA level, Gleason score, probability of positive lymph nodes (Partin's tables and Roach equation), and 5-year disease free survival (Kattan nomogram). Main findings Overexpression of ErbB-4 (≥1) was detected in 30 (60%) patients and overexpression using cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was ≥2 in 19 (38%) and 17 (34%) patients, respectively. In only one third of the specimens was there any similarity between the 2 types of staining. Advanced tumor stage, high pretreatment PSA levels and high Gleason scores were evenly distributed among the patients with low (≤1) and intermediate/high (≥2) ErbB-4 expression. The probability of lymph node involvement and 5-year disease free survival were similar in both types of staining. Principal conclusions ErbB-4 was overexpressed (cytoplasmic and nuclear staining) in approximately one third of prostate cancer patients. The rate of similarity between the 2 staining types was only 33%: overexpression was evenly distributed among intermediate/high and low risk prostate cancer patients with both staining methods.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morton Freytag ◽  
Martina Kluth ◽  
Elena Bady ◽  
Claudia Hube-Magg ◽  
Georgia Makrypidi-Fraune ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1 (ESRP1) and 2 (ESRP2) regulate alternative splicing events of various pre-mRNAs. Some of these targets play a role in cancer-associated processes, including cytoskeleton reorganization and DNA-repair processes. This study was undertaken to estimate the impact of ESRP1 and ESRP2 alterations on prostate cancer patient prognosis. Methods A tissue microarray made from 17,747 individual cancer samples with comprehensive, pathological, clinical and molecular data was analyzed by immunohistochemistry for ESRP1 and ESRP2. Results Nuclear staining for ESRP1 was seen in 38.6% (36.0% low, 2.6% high) of 12,140 interpretable cancers and in 41.9% (36.4% low, 5.3% high) of 12,962 interpretable cancers for ESRP2. Nuclear protein expression was linked to advanced tumor stage, high Gleason score, presence of lymph node metastasis, early biochemical recurrence, and ERG-positive cancers (p < 0.0001 each). Expression of ESRPs was significantly linked to 11 (ESRP1)/9 (ESRP2) of 11 analyzed deletions in all cancers and to 8 (ESRP1)/9 (ESRP2) of 11 deletions in ERG-negative cancers portending a link to genomic instability. Combined ESRPs expression analysis suggested an additive effect and showed the worst prognosis for cancers with high ESRP1 and ESRP2 expression. Multivariate analyses revealed that the prognostic impact of ESRP1, ESRP2 and combined ESRP1/ESRP2 expression was independent of all established pre- and postoperative prognostic features. Conclusions Our data show a striking link between nuclear ESRP expression and adverse features in prostate cancer and identifies expression of ESRP1 and/or ESRP2 as independent prognostic markers with a potential for routine application.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document