scholarly journals Which PSA Endpoint Best Predicts Disease-Free Survival in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Exclusive Radiation Therapy Combined With Hormones?

Author(s):  
M. Thouant ◽  
A. Bertaut ◽  
P. Pommier ◽  
P. Maingon ◽  
E. Martin ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-561
Author(s):  
R. Bertè ◽  
P. Guaitoli ◽  
S. Callari ◽  
L. Zappalà ◽  
G. Mazza

Cancer progression, following radical prostatectomy, is distinguished by its biological or clinical aspects and is a controversial subject. As adjuvant therapy there is hormonal treatment and radiation therapy or a combination of both. The lack of standardization of the main pathological features of prostate cancer does not allow an accurate valuation of the results from the most important studies. A real efficacy in local or distant control seems to be certain, while the influence on disease-free survival is more uncertain. After a review of the most common options of treatment, the Authors present their results from 107 radical prostatectomies carried out between 1989 and 1994.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-55
Author(s):  
R. M. Isargapov ◽  
M. O. Vozdvizhensky ◽  
A. L. Gorbachev

The purpose of the study was to optimize treatment of patients with prostate cancer at high risk of disease progression using a quantitative assessment of risk factors and the treatment method.Material and methods. Immediate outcomes were analyzed in 107 patients with pt3a-bn0m0g2–4 prostate cancer, who were treated in samara regional clinical oncological dispensary between 2010 and 2012. All patients were divided into 2 groups. Group i patients underwent surgery alone and group ii patients underwent surgery followed by radiation therapy. All patients were at high risk of disease progression according to the d’amico classification. Onlyone risk factor was identified in 64 patients, two risk factors in 37 patients, and three risk factors in 6 cases. The overall survival, cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival were analyzed.Results. In cases with one and two risk factors, the overall, disease-free and cancer-specific survival rates were statistically higher than in cases with three risk factors in the entire cohort (p<0.05). In the subgroups with one, two, and three risk factors, there were no statistically significant differences in overall and cancer-specific survival rates (p>0.05). Disease-free survival rates in the presence of one factor were not statistically different (p=0.920). In the presence of two and three factors, the relapse-free survival rates were statistically higher in group ii patients (surgical with adjuvant radiation therapy, p=0.049, p=0.025).Conclusion. The presence of three risk factors significantly increased the likelihood of a poor prognosis compared with one or two factors. Adjuvant radiation therapy improved survival rates in prostate cancer patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16520-e16520
Author(s):  
P. H. Thaker ◽  
F. Gao ◽  
I. Zighelboim ◽  
M. A. Powell ◽  
J. S. Rader ◽  
...  

e16520 Background: Recently, the rates of obese and overweight patients have increased dramatically. However, the effect of body mass index (BMI) have not been evaluated in treatment outcomes for patients with advanced stage cervical cancer receiving definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and is the purpose of this study. Methods: After obtaining approval from the Washington University Human Studies Protection Office, a retrospective cohort study (n = 321) was performed on all cervical cancer patients with stage IB1 with positive lymph nodes or ≥ stage IB2 from January 1998 to January 2008. The median duration of follow up was 60 months. BMI was calculated using the National Institute of Health online BMI calculator. Main outcomes were overall survival, disease free survival, and radiation complications such as radiation enteritis/cystitis, bowel obstruction, and fistula formation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Results: Underweight patients (BMI<18.5 kg/m2) compared to normal weight (BMI = 18.5–25 kg/m2) and overweight/obese (>25 kg/m2) have a higher actuarial complication rate (p = 0.0137). Regardless of weight there is no difference in disease free survival. However, underweight patients have a significantly poorer overall survival than those patients with a higher BMI (>18.5 kg/m2) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Underweight patients have a diminished overall survival compared to normal or obese cervical cancer patients. This is of clinical relevance when counseling underweight cervical cancer patients who will be cured of the disease with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but have a significant risk of suffering potentially fatal complications from treatment. Further study needs to be done to elucidate this relationship further. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document