Clinical Evaluation of CA 15.3 in the Post-operative Follow-up of Breast Cancer Patients

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
M. Scaramuzzi ◽  
C. Amorotti ◽  
M. De Palma ◽  
A.M. Falchi ◽  
E. Baldini ◽  
...  

In 265 patients operated for breast carcinoma the monoclonal antibody serum test CA 15.3 was predictive of metastatic diffusion of the disease. Its level increased in cases of distant metastasis with no significant difference between multiple and single sites (p = 0.014). The concentration of the marker was higher in 21 (23.8%) patients without nodal involvement and in 19 (27.5%) with nodal involvement (p = 0.193). Our study suggests that CA 15.3 may be an aid in the follow-up of patients with metastatic diffusion of breast cancer.

1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schmidt-Rhode ◽  
Klaus-Dieter Schulz ◽  
Gerhard Sturm ◽  
Anette Raab-Frick ◽  
Helge Prinz

CA 15.3 is an antigenic determinant associated with human mammary carcinomas. Two murine monoclonal antibodies have been raised against the determinants, and an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA-Kit, Centocor, USA) has been developed to determine the antigen levels in plasma of cancer patients. Based on the 99% confidence limit of healthy women, plasma values above 30 U/ml are considered abnormal. Plasma samples from 357 women were examined in the present study. Healthy females (n = 84) ranged below the cut-off level between < 10 and 29 U/ml. Higher values were found in 12.5% of benign breast diseases and in 23.6% of breast cancer patients, including all stages. Depending on the stage of the disease, there were elevated levels in 11% of operable breast cancer patients preoperatively, in 7% of the cases with no evidence of disease after primary treatment and in 63.5% ofpatients with disseminated mammary carcinoma. In metastasized breast cancer the frequency and the degree of abnormal titers were closely related to the extent of the metastatic disease. Follow-up examinations of 63 patients under cytotoxic therapy showed CA 15.3 changes correlating well with the clinical course in up to 90% of the antigen positive cases. The present data indicate that CA 15.3 may be useful in the surveillance of breast cancer patients. However in our study one third of the patients with metastatic breast cancer did not show any increase in CA 15.3 and must be regarded as antigen negative.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2712-2721 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Sertoli ◽  
P Bruzzi ◽  
P Pronzato ◽  
P Queirolo ◽  
D Amoroso ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The aim of this multicentric randomized trial was to determine whether reducing the interval between surgery and chemotherapy improves the outcome of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 1985 and July 1992, 600 breast cancer patients, clinical stages T1-3A,N0-2,M0 were randomly assigned to a perioperative cycle (PC) of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CEF). Node-negative (N-) patients did not receive any further treatment. Node positive (N+) patients received 11 cycles if previously given PC, or 12 cycles of CEF alternated with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CMF). In addition, N+ patients received concomitant or sequential 5-year tamoxifen therapy. RESULTS At a median follow-up duration of 5.7 years, no significant difference in survival (88% v 84%, P = .3) between the two treatment arms was seen. However, a difference of borderline significance in relapse-free survival (RFS; 76% v 70%, P = .053) was evident. A significant survival advantage for the PC arm was detected only in the estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients (P = .003). RFS was significantly improved in N- patients, postmenopausal patients, and ER- patients. Multivariate analyses show that pathologic tumor size, nodal status, receptor status, and treatment (only in ER- patients) are significantly correlated with survival and RFS. PC toxicity did not influence wound healing. CONCLUSION This study provides preliminary evidence that PC positively affects relapse rate and survival in some subgroups, namely, ER- patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Hanan R. Nassar ◽  
Alfred E. Namour ◽  
Hanan E. Shafik ◽  
Amr S. El Sayed ◽  
Samar M. Kamel ◽  
...  

Abstract Many studies have demonstrated that osteopontin (OPN) contributes functionally to aggressive behaviour in many tumours including breast cancer. This study aims to investigate its role as a simple biochemical marker easily measured in plasma of breast cancer patients to give an early signal for metastases and to detect its relationship to clinicopathological findings and survival. We measured plasma OPN, CA15.3 and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in 55 patients, 28 with early stage breast cancer and 27 with bone metastasis out of whom 20 had metastasis in other sites. The median age at diagnosis for non-metastatic cases was 60 years (range 35-85) and for metastatic cases was 45.5 years (range 32-59). In the non-metastatic group, 78.57% of the patients were histologically graded as grades I and II and 21.43% as grade III tumours. In the metastatic group, 81.48% of the patients had grades I and II and 18.52% had grade III tumours; 54% of patients in the non-metastatic group were at stage II and 46% were at stage III at presentation. All patients of group II had bone metastasis, 33% had liver metastases, 25.9% had lung metastasis and 14.8% had lymph node metastasis. Patients with non-metastatic disease had a median OPN level of 55 ng/ml (range 54-150 ng/l), while those in the metastatic group had a median of 148.0 ng/l (range 56.0-156.0 ng/l), a difference which was statistically significant (P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median levels of CA15.3 and ALP between both groups. The median OPN level was significantly higher with serum ALP level above 90, progesterone receptor (PR) status, bone and visceral metastasis. Median OPN was not affected significantly by menopausal status (P-value 0.3), tumour grade (P-value 0.3), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P-value 0.7), pathological type (P-value 0.42) or serum CA15.3 level (P-value 0.6). At the end of 12-year follow-up, 83% of the patients survived (92.3% in the non-metastatic versus 74.1% in the metastatic group). The estimated median survival for the whole study population at 12 years was 13 years (95% CI 8.144-17.856). The estimated median survival was 13 years (95% CI 0) and 12 years (95% CI 4.893-19.11) in patients with median OPN levels of <142 and ≥142, respectively, a difference which was not statistically significant (P = 0.343). No statistically significant difference in overall survival OS was noticed in relation to menopausal status (P = 0.7), pathological type (P = 0.4) and hormone receptor status (P = 0.3). At 6-year follow-up, it was found that OS was affected by the presence of visceral metastasis, tumour grade, serum plasma level of ALP and the serum level of CA15.3 (P = 0.0006, 0.007, 0.001 and 0.03, respectively). However, the presence of bone metastasis did not affect OS (P = 0.6). Osteopontin level can be a simple biochemical marker easily measured in plasma of breast cancer patients to give early signals for metastases, but not a prognostic factor for survival.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Vankrieken ◽  
F. Heureux ◽  
J. Longueville ◽  
R. De Hertogh

In order to verify the efficiency of the tumor markers CA 15.3 and CA 549 in the follow-up of breast cancer patients, it was necessary first to check the cutoff levels of each tumor marker in women with an increased age-related risk, but with no evidence of disease. From 132 serum samples in this age group, we confirmed the CA 549 cutoff level of 12.1 U/ml. However, the cutoff of CA 15.3 was 34 U/ml, which is higher than previously reported in the literature. Fifty-two breast cancer patients with or without metastases at the time of entry into the study were followed for 2 to 3 years with both tumor markers. The sensitivity, specificity and the test efficiency for the presence of metastases were analyzed with each tumor marker. Taking into account the different cutoff levels, we concluded that both tumor markers can be used independently to follow the clinical situation of patients. In several cases an increase in both tumor markers was observed before a clinical diagnosis of metastases could be made. Combination of these two tumor markers gave no more significant information about the patient's clinical situation than each tumor marker alone.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Rodríguez De Paterna ◽  
F. Arnaiz ◽  
J. Estenoz ◽  
B. Ortuño ◽  
E. Lanzós

Serum levels of CEA, CA 15.3 and CA 27.29 were measured during the follow-up of 499 breast cancer patients. Studies included three different groups of women: 82 blood donors free of disease, 42 patients with non-malignant breast diseases and 499 breast cancer patients. After the determinaion of cut-off values, serum levels of tumor markers did not show significant elevations in benign breast diseases. On the basis of our results CA 15.3 (sensitivity = 57%; accuracy = 87%) was the most effective marker, CA 27.29 (sensitivity = 62%; accuracy = 83%) was the most sensitive and CEA (sensitivity = 45%; accuracy = 81%) was the least sensitive and effective marker. The combined use of markers was evaluated by step-wise logistic regression analysis. The regression coefficients showed that CA 15.3 (coeff. = 2.97) and CA 27.29 (coeff. = 1.46) were suitable for the detection of possible metastases during follow-up. Finally, we studied the relationship between pT, pN, pM and circulating levels of CA 15.3 and CA 27.29.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 117955490800200
Author(s):  
Annamaria Molino ◽  
Monica Giovannini ◽  
Rocco Micciolo ◽  
Alessandra Auriemma ◽  
Elena Fiorio ◽  
...  

In 125 early breast cancer patients who underwent multiple bone marrow aspirates, there was no significant difference in terms of disease-free and overall survival after a median follow-up of 163 months between the patients with or without micrometastasis at the time of primary surgery. However, when the time-dependent evolution of the bone marrow aspirates was taken into account, some evidence for a longer disease-free and overall survival was found for the patients with negative bone marrow


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.M. Cikota ◽  
M.V. Branković-Magić ◽  
V.S. Jović ◽  
S.S. Radulović ◽  
Z.M. Magić

Purpose and methods A large body of experimental evidence has confirmed that different tumors, including breast carcinomas, can stimulate specific T-cell-mediated immune responses. In this study we have analyzed patterns of T-cell clonality in tumor samples of 54 breast cancer patients classified as lymph node negative, N0 (n=16), or lymph node positive, N+ (n=38). The clonality of T-cells was analyzed by the PCR-PAGE method. Results Monoclonal/oligoclonal (M/O) T-cell populations were found in 15 breast cancer patients, nine N+ and six N0. In all analyzed groups (N+ + N0, N+, N0) the incidence of relapse was not significantly different between patients with M/O and patients with polyclonal T-cells. Comparison of disease-free interval (DFI) between patients divided according to the presence of TCR? monoclonality/oligoclonality showed a marginally significant difference only in the group of N+ patients within the first 24 months of follow-up. Patients with a M/O T-cell population had a shorter DFI than patients with a polyclonal T-cell population. This difference was not observed when the complete follow-up period was considered in the same group of patients. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients with M/O and patients with polyclonal T-cells. Conclusion Our results imply that tumor infiltrating T-cells are usually polyclonal. The pattern of T-cell clonality does not correlate with the incidence of relapse and the duration of DFI and OS in the analyzed groups of breast cancer patients, excluding N+ patients with M/O T-cells who had a shorter DFI in the first 24 months of follow-up. This observation suggests that polyclonal T-cell populations may provide a broader spectrum of T-cell-mediated antitumor response.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imjai Chitapanarux ◽  
Pitchayaponne Klunklin ◽  
Attapol Pinitpatcharalert ◽  
Patumrat Sripan ◽  
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective We evaluated the long-term outcomes and late toxicity of conventional fractionated (CF) and hypofractionated (HF) postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in terms of locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicity. Methods A cohort of 1640 of breast cancer patients receiving PMRT between January 2004 and December 2014 were enrolled. Nine hundred eighty patients were treated with HF-PMRT: 2.65 Gy/fraction to a total of 42.4–53 Gy and 660 patients were treated with CF-PMRT: 2 Gy/fraction to a total of 50–60 Gy. Results The median follow-up time was 71.8 months (range 41.5–115.9 months). No significant difference was found in the rates of 5-year LRRFS, DFS, and OS of HF-PMRT vs CF-PMRT; 96% vs. 94% (p = 0.373), 70% vs. 72% (p = 0.849), and 73% vs. 74% (p = 0.463), respectively. We identified a cohort of 937 eligible breast cancer patients who could receive late toxicities assessment. With a median follow-up time of this patient cohort of 106.3 months (range 76–134 months), there was a significant higher incidence of grade 2 or more late skin (4% vs 1%) and subcutaneous (7% vs 2%) toxicity in patients treated with HF-PMRT vs CF-PMRT. Patients who received additional radiation boost were significantly higher in the HF-PMRT group. Grade 2 or more late RTOG/EORTC lung toxicity was significant lesser in HF-PMRT vs CF-PMRT (9% vs 16%). Grade 1 brachial plexopathy was also significant lesser in HF-PMRT vs CF-PMRT (2% vs 8%). Heart toxicity and lymphedema were similar in both groups. Conclusions HF-PMRT is feasible to deliver with comparable long-term efficacy to CF-PMRT. HF-PMRT had higher grade 2 or more skin and subcutaneous toxicity but less lung and brachial plexus toxicity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document