scholarly journals Chest X-ray interpretation in UK intensive care units: A survey 2014

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalba Spiritoso ◽  
Simon Padley ◽  
Suveer Singh
Author(s):  
Akın Çinkooğlu ◽  
Selen Bayraktaroğlu ◽  
Naim Ceylan ◽  
Recep Savaş

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the imaging modality to be used in the diagnosis and management of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to make a comparison between computed tomography (CT) and chest X-ray (CXR) through a scoring system that can be beneficial to the clinicians in making the triage of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia at their initial presentation to the hospital. Results Patients with a negative CXR (30.1%) had significantly lower computed tomography score (CTS) (p < 0.001). Among the lung zones where the only infiltration pattern was ground glass opacity (GGO) on CT images, the ratio of abnormality seen on CXRs was 21.6%. The cut-off value of X-ray score (XRS) to distinguish the patients who needed intensive care at follow-up (n = 12) was 6 (AUC = 0.933, 95% CI = 0.886–0.979, 100% sensitivity, 81% specificity). Conclusions Computed tomography is more effective in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia at the initial presentation due to the ease detection of GGOs. However, a baseline CXR taken after admission to the hospital can be valuable in predicting patients to be monitored in the intensive care units.


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasse Møller-Sørensen ◽  
Jakob Gjedsted ◽  
Vibeke Lind Jørgensen ◽  
Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the need for an accessible, point-of-care and accurate imaging modality for pulmonary assessment. COVID-19 pneumonia is mainly monitored with chest X-ray, however, lung ultrasound (LUS) is an emerging tool for pulmonary evaluation. In this study, patients with verified COVID-19 disease hospitalized at the intensive care unit and treated with ventilator and extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were evaluated with LUS for pulmonary changes. LUS findings were compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) and ventilator settings. Ten patients were included and scanned the day after initiation of ECMO and thereafter every second day until, if possible, weaned from ECMO. In total 38 scans adding up to 228 cineloops were recorded and analyzed off-line with the use of a constructed LUS score. The study indicated that patients with a trend of lower LUS scores over time were capable of being weaned from ECMO. LUS score was associated to CRP (R = 0.34; p < 0.03) and compliance (R = 0.60; p < 0.0001), with the strongest correlation to compliance. LUS may be used as a primary imaging modality for pulmonary assessment reducing the use of chest X-ray in COVID-19 patients treated with ventilator and ECMO.


2017 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelby Resnick ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Efstathios Karamanos ◽  
Dimitra Skiada ◽  
James A. Dollahite ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Calvillo Batllés ◽  
Leonor Cerdá-Alberich ◽  
Carles Fonfría-Esparcia ◽  
Ainhoa Carreres-Ortega ◽  
Carlos Francisco Muñoz-Núñez ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: To develop prognosis prediction models for COVID-19 patients attending an emergency department (ED) based on initial chest X-ray (CXR), demographics, clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: All symptomatic confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital ED between February 24th and April 24th 2020 were recruited. CXR features, clinical and laboratory variables and CXR abnormality indices extracted by a convolutional neural network (CNN) diagnostic tool were considered potential predictors on this first visit. The most serious individual outcome defined the three severity level: 0) home discharge or hospitalization ≤ 3 days, 1) hospital stay >3 days and 2) intensive care requirement or death. Severity and in-hospital mortality multivariable prediction models were developed and internally validated. The Youden index was used for model selection.Results: A total of 440 patients were enrolled (median 64 years; 55.9% male); 13.6% patients were discharged, 64% hospitalized, 6.6% required intensive care and 15.7% died. The severity prediction model included oxygen saturation/inspired oxygen fraction (SatO2/FiO2), age, C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocyte count, extent score of lung involvement on CXR (ExtScoreCXR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer level and platelets count, with AUC-ROC=0.94 and AUC-PRC=0.88. The mortality prediction model included age, SatO2/FiO2, CRP, LDH, CXR extent score, lymphocyte count and D-dimer level, with AUC-ROC=0.97 and AUC-PRC=0.78. The addition of CXR CNN-based indices slightly improved the predictive metrics for mortality (AUC-ROC=0.97 and AUC-PRC=0.83).Conclusion: The developed and internally validated severity and mortality prediction models could be useful as triage tools for COVID-19 patients and they should be further validated at different ED.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan M. Niehues ◽  
Lisa C. Adams ◽  
Robert A. Gaudin ◽  
Christoph Erxleben ◽  
Sarah Keller ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Meinrad Beer ◽  
Patrick Thiam ◽  
Ludwig Lauser ◽  
Hanna Nieberler ◽  
Hans Kestler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document