Abstract
Objectives
The objective is to conduct a systematic review on the safety of using enteral nutrition formulations containing dietary fiber in hospitalized critical care patients.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.1,2020). Searches were implemented in four databases on 4/20/20. Results were limited to English language studies conducted in humans. Any clinical study design or case study measuring adverse events (e.g., diarrhea and mortality) or health outcomes (as defined in each study) associated with enteral nutrition interventions containing dietary fiber in adult critically ill patients was considered. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted on outcomes assessed by three or more included studies.
Results
Altogether, 18 articles were included, and 11 randomized controlled trials assessed diarrhea outcomes (i.e., diarrhea score and number or frequency of events). Six studies used the Hart and Dobb (1988) diarrhea score, and random effects meta-analyses showed the mean diarrhea scores were lower for fiber compared to non-fiber groups (n = 4, pooled mean difference: −2.78, 95% confidence interval: −4.10, −1.47). Five of seven reported group comparisons showed fewer diarrhea events for fiber compared with non-fiber groups, although the overall difference was not statistically significant (n = 7, pooled risk ratio: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.45, 1.02). For three studies using other or unspecified scoring methods, pooled results showed significantly fewer diarrhea events in the fiber groups compared to non-fiber groups (n = 3, pooled RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.89). Studies reported no difference in incidence of mortality due to fiber interventions (n = 7, pooled RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.66, 1.48). Risk of bias for diarrhea outcomes was high due to missing outcome data, and there was some concern for bias due to randomization, measurement of the outcome, and selection of reported results.
Conclusions
Enteral nutrition formulas with fiber may help reduce incidence and severity of diarrhea in critically ill patients without increasing incidence of mortality. As these results are subject to bias, more high-quality studies are needed to verify this conclusion.
Funding Sources
This study was supported by funding from an unrestricted educational grant from Nestle Health Sciences.
The provision of central venous access, transfer of critically ill patients and advanced airway management.: Are advanced critical care practitioners safe and effective?
