scholarly journals Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175346661878509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coenraad F.N. Koegelenberg ◽  
Jane A. Shaw ◽  
Elvis M. Irusen ◽  
Y. C. Gary Lee

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affects more than 1 million people globally. There is a dearth of evidence on the therapeutic approach to MPE, and not surprisingly a high degree of variability in the management thereof. We aimed to provide practicing clinicians with an overview of the current evidence on the management of MPE, preferentially focusing on studies that report patient-related outcomes rather than pleurodesis alone, and to provide guidance on how to approach individual cases. A pleural intervention for MPE will perforce be palliative in nature. A therapeutic thoracentesis provides immediate relief for most. It can be repeated, especially in patients with a slow rate of recurrence and a short anticipated survival. Definitive interventions, individualized according the patient’s wishes, performance status, prognosis and other considerations (including the ability of the lung to expand) should be offered to the remainder of patients. Chemical pleurodesis (achieved via intercostal drain or pleuroscopy) and indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) have equal impact on patient-based outcomes, although patients treated with IPC spend less time in hospital and have less need for repeat pleural drainage interventions. Talc slurry via IPC is an attractive recently validated option for patients who do not have a nonexpandable lung.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 00226-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Merrick ◽  
Taylor Sherrill ◽  
Nikolaos I. Kanellakis ◽  
Rachelle Asciak ◽  
Georgios T. Stathopoulos ◽  
...  

Respirology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 764-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan A.P. Olfert ◽  
Erika D. Penz ◽  
Braden J. Manns ◽  
Eleanor K. Mishra ◽  
Helen E. Davies ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe B Putnam ◽  
Garrett L Walsh ◽  
Stephen G Swisher ◽  
Jack A Roth ◽  
Douglas M Suell ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Merrick ◽  
T Sherrill ◽  
NI Kanellakis ◽  
R Asciak ◽  
GT Stathopoulos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Lucía Ferreiro ◽  
Juan Suárez-Antelo ◽  
José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño ◽  
María E. Toubes ◽  
Vanessa Riveiro ◽  
...  

Symptomatic malignant pleural effusion is a common clinical problem. This condition is associated with very high mortality, with life expectancy ranging from 3 to 12 months. Studies are contributing evidence on an increasing number of therapeutic options (therapeutic thoracentesis, thoracoscopic pleurodesis or thoracic drainage, indwelling pleural catheter, surgery, or a combination of these therapies). Despite the availability of therapies, the management of malignant pleural effusion is challenging and is mainly focused on the relief of symptoms. The therapy to be administered needs to be designed on a case-by-case basis considering patient’s preferences, life expectancy, tumour type, presence of a trapped lung, resources available, and experience of the treating team. At present, the management of malignant pleural effusion has evolved towards less invasive approaches based on ambulatory care. This approach spares the patient the discomfort caused by more invasive interventions and reduces the economic burden of the disease. A review was performed of the diagnosis and the different approaches to the management of malignant pleural effusion, with special emphasis on their indications, usefulness, cost-effectiveness, and complications. Further research is needed to shed light on the current matters of controversy and help establish a standardized, more effective management of this clinical problem.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1040-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Junaid Akram ◽  
Usman Khalid ◽  
Muhammad Abu Bakar ◽  
Faheem Mahmood Butt ◽  
Mohammad Bilal Ashraf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document