scholarly journals Quantitative Improvements in Hop Test Scores After a 6-Week Neuromuscular Training Program

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Meierbachtol ◽  
Eric Rohman ◽  
Eric Paur ◽  
John Bottoms ◽  
Marc Tompkins
Keyword(s):  
Test Scores ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Neuromuscular Training ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Hop Test ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: In patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), the effect of neuromuscular re-education (NMR) programs on standard hop tests outcomes, including limb symmetry indices (LSIs), is unknown. Hypothesis: Both legs will show improvement in hop test–measured units after neuromuscular training, but the involved leg will show relatively greater improvement leading to improved limb symmetry. Patients younger than 18 years will show more improvement than patients who are older. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Patients self-selected their participation in this NMR program, which was completed after traditional outpatient physical therapy. Pre– and post–hop test scores were recorded as the primary outcome measure. Results: Seventy-one patients met the inclusion criteria and completed hop testing. Overall, the involved leg showed significant improvements (pretest/posttest) for single-leg hop (138.30 cm/156.89 cm), triple crossover hop (370.05 cm/423.11 cm), and timed hop (2.21 s/1.99 s). Similarly, on the uninvolved leg, improvements were seen for the single-leg hop (159.30 cm/171.87 cm) and triple crossover hop (427.50 cm/471.27 cm). Overall mean limb symmetry improved across all 4 hop tests, but there was significant improvement only on the single-leg hop (87% pretest to 92% posttest). Patients younger than 18 years showed mean significant LSI improvement on the triple crossover hop. Conclusion: Utilizing an intensive 6-week NMR program after ACLR prior to return to sport can improve quantitative hop test measurements. Patients younger than 18 years had greater improvement than those 18 years and older. Clinical Relevance: Advanced NMR programs can be successfully utilized in the postoperative ACLR setting to improve quantitative limb symmetry.

scholarly journals HOP TEST AS A TOOL FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND PREVENTION OF INJURIES IN FOOTBALLERS DURING PRESEASON

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0004
Author(s):  
F García-Bol ◽  
V Posada-Franco ◽  
A Roldán-Valero ◽  
R Del Caño-Espinel
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Reference Values ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Hop Test ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Hop Tests (unipodal horizontal jumps) have been recommended as one of the reliable assessment tests when allowing a return to competition for a sportsperson after an anterior cruciate ligament injury1,2,3,4. Currently, comparison is made of the results with the contralateral limb through the symmetry index, a method which might not provide sufficient security upon the return to competitive sport5. Hop tests can be used in preseason to gain reference values prior to a possible injury. The objective of this review is to analise the scientific literature such as the F-Marc6 (reference manual of FIFA) to confirm whether include said tests in preseason for football teams. A search was conducted in the Pubmed y Cochrane databases (17/04/17) with the search terms “Hop Test”, “Football”, “Soccer”, and “Preseason”. Articles in English and Spanish were both accepted. Articles excluded were those that did not make reference to the knee, to football, and those that did not conduct tests during preseason. From a total of 33 articles, 4 with these search criteria were included, 5 articles were added trough the bibliography of other studies, and the F-Marc manual was analised. 4 of the articles used the hop tests in preseason for some type of study, of which 3 were used as part of a prospective assessment for the season. On the other hand, the F-Marc does not consider Hop Tests as an assessment test. Hop tests were not found to be used in preseason as reference values prior to possible future injuries, data which could be beneficial for a safe return to sport. Harris J, Abrams G, Bach B, Williams D, Heidloff D, Bush-Joseph C, Verma N, Forsythe B, Cole B. Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction. ORTHOPEDICS. 2014; 37: e103-e108. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011 Dec;27(12):1697-705. Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, Myklebust G, Risberg MA, Theisen D, Tsepis E, Werner S, Wondrasch B, Witvrouw E. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1798-805. Bolgla LA, Keskula DR. Reliability of lower extremity functional performance tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Sep;26(3):138-42. Wellsandt E, Failla MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Limb Symmetry Indexes Can Overestimate Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Mar 29:1-18. F-MARC. Football Medicine Manual. 2nd Edition. Available from: http://f-marc.com . 2017.

Hop Performance After Return to Sport in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Gaelic Football and Hurling Athletes

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Damien Murphy ◽  
Quinette A. Louw ◽  
Colum Moloney ◽  
Dominique Leibbrandt ◽  
Amanda M. Clifford
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Hop Test ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Purpose: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most severe injuries in the Gaelic Athletic Association. Hop tests measure functional performance after ACL reconstruction as they replicate the key requirements for a match situation. However, research examining functional recovery of ACL-reconstructed Gaelic athletes is lacking. The objective of this study is to determine if athletes restore normal hop symmetry after ACL reconstruction and to examine if bilateral deficiencies persist in hop performance following return to sport. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to evaluate hop performance of 30 ACL-reconstructed Gaelic athletes who had returned to competition and 30 uninjured controls in a battery of hop tests including a single, 6-m, triple, and triple-crossover hop test. Results: In each test, the mean symmetry score of the ACL reconstruction group was above the cutoff for normal performance of 90% adopted by this study (98%, 99%, 97%, and 99% for the single, 6-m, triple, and triple-crossover hop, respectively). No significant differences in absolute hop scores emerged between involved and control limbs, with the exception of the single-hop test where healthy dominant limbs hopped significantly further than ACL-reconstructed dominant limbs (P = .02). No significant deficits were identified on the noninvolved side. Conclusions: The majority of ACL-reconstructed Gaelic athletes demonstrate normal levels of hop symmetry after returning to competition. Suboptimal hop performance can persist on the involved side compared with control limbs. Targeted rehabilitation may be warranted after returning to competition to restore performance to levels of healthy uninjured athletes.

scholarly journals Uninjured Youth Athlete Performance on Single-Leg Hop Testing: How Many Can Achieve Recommended Return-to-Sport Criterion?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 552-558
Author(s):  
Elliot M. Greenberg ◽  
Julie Dyke ◽  
Anne Leung ◽  
Michael Karl ◽  
J. Todd Lawrence ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Youth Athletes ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Hop Test ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Age And Sex ◽  
Athlete Performance

Background: Current anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) guidelines utilize single-leg hop tests (SLHTs) to assist in return-to-sport decision making. A limb symmetry index (LSI) of ≥90% is often required; however, after ACLR, most youth athletes cannot achieve this standard. Reporting the performance of age-matched normative controls will allow clinicians to compare post-ACLR performance with noninjured peers, improving the utility of SLHTs. The purpose of this study was to report hop test LSI within healthy youth athletes and determine whether athlete performance surpasses post-ACLR requirements. Hypothesis: The LSI for the majority of healthy youth athletes will be ≥90%. Study Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Each participant performed a single hop (SH), triple hop (TrH), crossover hop (CrH), and timed hop (TiH). A 3-trial mean was utilized to calculate an LSI (nondominant/dominant leg [self-reported kicking leg]) for each hop. The frequency of pass/fail at ≥90% LSI was calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients analyzed the relationship between the different hops, and a 2-way analysis of variance determined the effects of age and sex on LSI. Results: A total of 340 participants (54% male; mean age, 10.9 ± 1.5 years; range, 8-14 years) were included. The mean LSI was >95% for each SLHT (SH, 97.9% [SD, 0.7]; TrH, 96.6% [SD, 0.6]; CrH, 96.8% [SD, 0.8]; TiH, 96.5% [SD, 0.6]). When analyzed as a test battery, only 45% of participants achieved this standard. Significantly weak to moderate correlations existed among hop tests ( P < 0.01; r = 0.342-0.520). Age and sex had no effect on LSI ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: While the mean LSI in our sample was >95% for each individual hop test, participant performance across all SLHT components varied, such that less than half of healthy athletes could achieve ≥90% LSI across all hops. Clinical Relevance: Current guidelines require ≥90% LSI on SLHTs. The majority of healthy youth athletes could not achieve this standard, which questions the validity of this LSI threshold in youth athletes after ACLR.

scholarly journals The hybrid anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgical technique does permit an accelerated early functional recovery and return to sport.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0017
Author(s):  
Peter Annear ◽  
Ebert Jay
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Quadriceps Strength ◽  
Hamstring Graft ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tegner Score

Objectives: A major reason for undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for patients is to return to high demand activity and sport. Published literature supports a return to sport (RTS) at 6-12 months, though the recovery of lower limb strength and functional symmetry is critical and is linked with a patient’s ability to RTS, as well as reducing the incidence of secondary re-tear. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and RTS between patients undergoing ACLR utilizing a hamstring graft and those undergoing a hybrid technique which augments the hamstring graft with a synthetic LARS ligament. Methods: A non-randomized study design was used to compare clinical outcomes at 10-12 months post-surgery, in 82 patients undergoing conventional ACLR via a hamstring graft (HG) and 35 patients undergoing a hybrid hamstring/LARS graft (HLG). All patients were assessed using a range of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (IKDC, KOOS, Cinncinati, Lysholm, SF-36, Tegner, Noyes, Global Rating of Change – GRC). Limb symmetry indices (LSIs) presenting the operated limb as a percentage of the unaffected limb were calculated for several strength/functional assessments (peak isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength, the single, triple and triple crossover hop for distance, and the 6 m timed hop). Results: There were no group differences (p>0.05) in patient demographics and the majority of PROs. The HLG group perceived themselves to be significantly ‘more recovered’ (p=0.046) on the GRC scale (HLG = 3.2, HG = 2.2), and also reported a significantly greater (p=0.004) Tegner score (HLG = 7.2, HG = 5.9). For the HG group, 62% of patients had returned to Noyes Level 1 or 2 activities, versus 80% of the HLG group. For the Tegner score, 57% of patients reported a score >6, versus 77% of the HLG group. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in LSIs between groups for the strength and functional hop tests. However, the HLG group demonstrated a mean LSI above 90% for all four hop tests, while all four were below 90% in the HG group. Both groups demonstrated mean hamstring strength LSIs above 90%, while the quadriceps strength LSI was 81.9% and 85.8% for the HG and HLG groups, respectively. Conclusion: Patients in the HLG group perceived themselves to be more recovered, and had returned to a higher level of activity/sport, compared with the HG group. While not significant, the HLG group did demonstrate more favorable functional hop and quadriceps strength LSIs, which has been linked with the ability to RTS and the incidence of ACL re-tear. A larger patient cohort and follow-up is required to observe long-term outcomes.

Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Is Associated With Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
April L. McPherson ◽  
Julian A. Feller ◽  
Timothy E. Hewett ◽  
Kate E. Webster
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Short Version ◽  
Cutoff Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Psychological responses after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have been identified as predictors of return to sport but have not been investigated in relation to further injury. Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine whether psychological readiness to return to sport is associated with second ACL injury. It was hypothesized a priori that at both preoperative and 12-month postoperative time points, patients who sustained a second ACL injury would have lower psychological readiness than patients who did not have a second injury. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients who had a primary ACLR procedure between June 2014 and June 2016 completed the ACL–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) (short version) scale before their ACLR and repeated the scale at 12 months after surgery to assess psychological readiness to return to sport. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (range, 2-4 years) after surgery to determine further injury. The primary outcome was the relationship between ACL-RSI scores and the incidence of second ACL injury. Results: In 329 patients who returned to sport after ACLR, 52 (16%) sustained a second ACL injury. No difference in psychological readiness was observed at the preoperative time point, but patients who sustained a second injury trended toward lower psychological readiness at 12 months compared with noninjured patients (60.9 vs 67.2 points; P = .11). Younger (≤20 years) patients with injury had significantly lower psychological readiness to return to sport than young noninjured patients (60.8 vs 71.5 points; P = .02), but no difference was found in older patients (60.9 vs 64.6 points; P = .58). In younger patients, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff score of 76.7 points with 90% sensitivity to identify younger patients who sustained a second ACL injury. Conclusion: Younger patients with lower psychological readiness are at higher risk for a second ACL injury after return to sport.

scholarly journals Combined Intra- and Extra-Articular Technique in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Joints ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Zanovello ◽  
Federica Rosso ◽  
Alessandro Bistolfi ◽  
Roberto Rossi ◽  
Filippo Castoldi
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Over The Top

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the “over the top” (OTT) nonanatomical technique for revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 31.9 ± 11.2 years underwent revision of ACL reconstruction using OTT technique. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, Tegner score, Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sport (SPORTS) score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale, and KT-1000 evaluation were recorded at a mean follow-up of 30.7 ± 18.9 months. Results Postoperatively, the IKDC objective total score significantly improved (p = 0.0046). The KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner scores also improved, but the results were not statistically significant (62.4 vs. 72.6, 6.5 vs. 75.8, and 4.1 vs. 6.0, respectively). The subjective IKDC evaluation score improved from an average of 51.1 points to 63.7 points at the last follow-up (p = 0.0027). The RTP prevalence was 81.8%, with 44.4% of the patients returning to the same preinjury level. According to the SPORTS score, 16.6% of patients played sport without limitations in activity and performance. The average ACL-RSI score was 52.1 ± 27.0. No major complications were reported. A total of 21.5% of patients underwent surgical removal of staples. The failure prevalence was 14.3% and the cumulative survivorship, calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, was equal to 70% at 60 months of follow-up. Conclusion The OTT technique in the revision ACL reconstruction provided improvement in objective and subjective scores, good RTP prevalence, and acceptable rate of complication and failure. One of the advantages was the possibility to avoid the femoral tunnel. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

scholarly journals Confidence varies more than time during a change-of-direction task in patients following unilateral ACL reconstruction (180)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0029
Author(s):  
Daniel Ogborn ◽  
Brittany Bruinooge ◽  
Jarret Woodmass ◽  
Devin Lemmex ◽  
Gregory Stranges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Dynamic Performance ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Quadriceps Tendon ◽  
Change Of Direction ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Comparable Performance ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Patient Confidence

Objectives: Psychological outcomes may be important for predicting readiness to return to sport and guiding appropriate treatment intervention during rehabilitation for patients following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Motor confidence can vary based on the context or task in which it is measured, and clinician perceptions of patient confidence may not accurately reflect patient confidence for a given athletic task. The purpose of this study was to: 1) determine how confidence varies between the affected and unaffected limb, 2) compare patient-rated confidence with a clinician’s perception of patient confidence during the completion of a change-of-direction (COD) test and 3) determine how performance varies between standard hop and change of direction tests completed at six months following ACL reconstruction. Methods: 46 patients (76.36 ± 11.82 kg, 176.2 ± 8.8 cm, 24.3 ± 7.2 yrs., 19/46 Female; Table 1) completed a functional assessment at six months following ACL reconstruction with a bone-patellar-tendon-bone (n=18), quadriceps tendon (n=13) or hamstring (n=15) graft. Functional testing included the single, triple and triple crossover hops for distance and the timed 505 change-of-direction (505) test. Patients rated their confidence during the 505 tests on a scale from “0”, representing no confidence, to “10”, or complete confidence in their ability to complete the task. A single clinician indicated their perception of the patient’s confidence on a 10 cm visual analog scale, with scores converted to a 0-10 scale for agreement analysis. Results: Patient (unaffected limb median 9 (range 6-10), affected limb median 7 (3-10), Z=-5.842, p<0.001,) and clinician-perceived confidence (unaffected median 8 (3-10), affected median 7 (3-9), Z=-3.52, p<0.001) were lower on the affected limb during the 505 task (Fig 2). There was no difference in median scores between clinician’s and patients rating the affected limb (Z=-0.681, p=0.496), whereas the clinician rated the unaffected limb lower (Z=-5.016, p<0.001; Fig 2). There was minimal to no agreement and correlation between patient and clinician-perceived confidence in either the affected (Κ = -0.090 (95%CI -0.196-0.016), p=0.170; Rs(44) = 0.173, p=0.251) or unaffected limb (Κ = -0.048 (95%CI -0.140-0.044), p=0.346; Rs(44) = 0.12, p=0.428) during the 505 test. Completion time did not differ whether the 180 pivot was performed on the affected or unaffected limb (3.2 ±0.5 s vs. 3.2 ±0.5 s, p=0.858), while large differences in performance in the single (138 ±39 cm vs. 103 ±42 cm, p<0.001), triple (451 ± 114 cm vs. 367 ± 116 cm, p<0.001) and triple crossover hop tests (403 ± 119 cm vs. 324 ± 116 cm, p<0.001) were observed (Fig 3A and B). Consequently there was a main effect of test (F(3,180) = 30.686, p<0.001) when comparing LSI indicating that the 505 LSI (100 ± 5%) was higher than for the three hop tests (73 ± 19%, p<0.001, 81 ± 13%, p<0.001, 80 ± 15%, p<0.001; Fig 4). Conclusions: Clinician’s perceptions of patient confidence may not accurately reflect patient confidence during the 505 test, although this requires validation with a larger population of clinicians over a greater variety of tasks. Both patients and a clinician report lower confidence in their reconstructed knee during the 505 test despite comparable performance between limbs. Measuring time alone during the 505 may not accurately reflect underlying performance impairments, and measures of confidence and consideration of movement strategies or compensations may be required, alongside additional tests of lower extremity dynamic performance. Further research is required to clarify the importance of task-specific motor confidence against measures of readiness (i.e., ACL-RSI) and in the context of facilitating safe return to sport following ACL reconstruction.

scholarly journals When Is It Safe to Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction? Reviewing the Criteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonatan Kaplan ◽  
Erik Witvrouw
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Functional Tests ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context: There is an ever-increasing trend toward sports, fitness, and recreation activities, so the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament sports injuries has increased. Perhaps the greatest challenge for sports clinicians is to return the injured athlete back to his/her original sport at an even greater level of functional ability than preinjury. For this, rigorous and well-researched criteria are needed. Evidence Acquisition: Using medical subject headings and free-text words, an electronic search was conducted up to October 2018. Subject-specific search was based on the terms return to play and return to sport in combination with guidelines, criteria, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Descriptive review. Level of Evidence: Level 2. Results: Five principal criteria were found, including psychological factors, performance/functional tests, strength tests, time, and modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. Conclusion: The psychological readiness of the player is a major factor in successful safe return to sport (SRTS) decision making. Although strength, performance, and functional tests presently form the mainstay of SRTS criteria, there exists very little scientific evidence for their validity. More protection should be provided to athletes with known risk factors. Movement quality is important, if not more important than the quantifiable measures. As a result of the significantly high rerupture rate in young individuals, delayed SRTS should be considered preferably beyond 9 months postsurgery.

Evolution of Functional Recovery using Hop Test Assessment after ACL Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 696-704
Author(s):  
Alexandre J.M. Rambaud ◽  
Jérémy Rossi ◽  
Thomas Neri ◽  
Pierre Samozino ◽  
Pascal Edouard
Keyword(s):  
Functional Recovery ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Symmetry Index ◽  
Limb Symmetry Index ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Hop Test

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate improvements in functional performance through the use of the Limb Symmetry Index of Single and Triple Hop tests between 12 and 52 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and to compare these values with usual time-based and performance-based criteria used during the return to sport continuum. Repeated functional assessments using Single and Triple Hop Tests at 12, 16, 22, 26, 39 and 52 postoperative weeks were evaluated. At each session, the median and interquartile range of Limb Symmetry Index of tests were calculated and compared with the usual criteria: return to participation:≥85%, between 12–16 w; return to play:≥90%, between 26–39 w. The results indicate that the median increased over time to 39 postoperative weeks and then stabilized. For Single Hop Test, wide variability was seen at 12 and 16 weeks (interquartile range=20%); this was lower from 22 to 52 weeks (interquartile range=8–6%). At 12 weeks for Single Hop Test, the median was 83.6% and did not meet>85% criteria for return to participation. Hop tests could be interesting functional tests to follow the functional recovery and help decision-making regarding return to participation and return to play.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document