scholarly journals Retrograde endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein using the superficial inferior epigastric vein as access vessel illustrated by a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2199499
Author(s):  
Mark S Whiteley ◽  
Charlotte E Davies
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Scar Tissue ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Below The Knee ◽  
Vein Access ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation ◽  
Percutaneous Cannulation ◽  
Vein Diameter

Endovenous thermal ablation is a first-line treatment for symptomatic varicose veins due to truncal vein reflux. Ablation of an incompetent great saphenous vein is usually performed from distally, with the vein access at the lowest point of reflux, or just below the knee. Occasionally there are patients in whom the great saphenous vein is difficult to access distally for reasons such as small vein diameter, scar tissue, vasospasm, difficult anatomy or multiple attempts with haematoma formation. In such cases, we access the great saphenous vein in a retrograde fashion by percutaneous cannulation of the superficial inferior epigastric vein, passing the catheter into the great saphenous vein just distal to the saphenofemoral junction and then down the vein to the required distal position. Ablation can then be performed, stopping the ablation in the great saphenous vein just distal to the junction of superficial inferior epigastric vein and great saphenous vein. We present a patient to illustrate our technique.

Saphenous vein diameter is a single risk factor for early recanalization after endothermal ablation of incompetent great saphenous vein

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-541
Author(s):  
Cemal Kemaloğlu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
The Third ◽  
Single Risk Factor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vein Diameter ◽  
Single Predictor

Background and aim The aim of this study was to compare endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques for efficacy and side effects for great saphenous vein (GSV) ablation. Materials and methods Two hundred twenty-one patients and 287 extremities that underwent GSV ablation with EVLA and RFA methods were analysed retrospectively; 135 GSVs were treated with EVLA, 152 GSVs were treated with RFA. Physical examination and Ultrasound (US) records at the first week, first month and third month were evaluated. Recanalization, endothermal heat-induced thrombosis formation, presence of ecchymosis greater than 10 cm and GSV diameter parameters were statistically analyzed. Results In the RFA group, 96.7% of the GSVs that were ablated were occluded at the end of the third month. In the EVLA group, this rate was 92.6%. There was no statistically significant difference between success of ablation ( P = 0.118). In the RFA group, ecchymotic areas, that is larger than 10 cm diameter were observed in 16 extremities, whereas in the EVLA group, 66 of 135 (48.9%) limbs were found to have ecchymotic area larger than 10 cm ( P < 0.001). More recanalizations were observed in GSVs larger than 10 mm in diameter which was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Conclusion Both EVLA and RFA methods are effective in treating GSV reflux. Compared to the EVLA, less ecchymosis occurs after RFA procedures. Regardless of the type of method used, the GSV diameter is a single predictor of recanalization.

scholarly journals Endovenous Ablation of Varicose Veins Experience at Tertiary Neurological Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-96
Author(s):  
Sandeep Raj Pandey ◽  
George Bush Jung Katwal ◽  
Sharad Hari Gajuryal
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Introduction: Endovascular ablation of varicose vein either by radiofrequency ablationor laser delivers sufficient thermal energy to incompetent vein segments to produce irreversible occlusion, fibrosis and ultimately disappearance of the vein.Materials and Methods: Three hundred patients with varicosities due to primary or recurrent sapheno-femoral or sapheno-popliteal junction and great or small saphenous veinreflux underwent out-patient and in-patient endovenous thermal ablation between January 2015 to December 2017.The great saphenous vein was ablated from 2-2.5 cm below sapheno-femoral junction to knee and the small saphenous vein was ablated from mid-calf to the sapheno-popliteal junction.Results: Patient returning time to normal activity was 0–1 days returning to normal daily activity were immediately after 4 hours. Duplex ultrasound follow-up (median 3-months) confirmed abolition of sapheno-femoral junction/great saphenous vein and sapheno-popliteal junction/small saphenous vein reflux in all limbs. There were no instances of skin burns or deep vein thrombosis, but, 7 patients developed transient cutaneous numbness involving sural nerve and 1 developed endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.Conclusions: This is likely to be more effective than conventional surgery, although long-term follow up is required.  Despite being expensive in comparison to open surgery, endovenous thermal ablation is superior in terms of: minimizing pain, avoiding incision, early mobilisation and discharge. Changing the treatment distance from 2 cm to 2.5 cm peripheral to the Deep veins junction may result in a diminished incidence of endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.

Successful lysis in a stroke following endovenous laser ablation and extensive miniphlebectomy of varicose veins

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Spinedi ◽  
Daniel Staub ◽  
Heiko Uthoff
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Fatal Complication ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Stroke is a very rare but potential fatal complication of endovenous thermal treatment in patients with a right-to-left shunt. To our best knowledge, there are only two reports in the literature of stroke after endovenous thermal ablation of varicose veins, one after endovenous laser ablation and one after radiofrequency ablation and phlebectomy, both treated conservatively. This report describes a successful lysis in a patient with an ischemic stroke associated with bilateral endovenous heat-induced thrombosis class I after endovenous laser ablation of both great saphenous vein and extensive miniphlebectomy in a patient with an unknown patent foramen ovale.

A description of the ‘smile sign’ and multi-pass technique for endovenous laser ablation of large diameter great saphenous veins

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 534-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma B Dabbs ◽  
Laurensius E Mainsiouw ◽  
Judith M Holdstock ◽  
Barrie A Price ◽  
Mark S Whiteley
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Diameter Distribution ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Vein Diameter

Aims To report on great saphenous vein diameter distribution of patients undergoing endovenous laser ablation for lower limb varicose veins and the ablation technique for large diameter veins. Methods We collected retrospective data of 1929 (943 left leg and 986 right leg) clinically incompetent great saphenous vein diameters treated with endovenous laser ablation over five years and six months. The technical success of procedure, complications and occlusion rate at short-term follow-up are reported. Upon compression, larger diameter veins may constrict asymmetrically rather than concentrically around the laser fibre (the ‘smile sign’), requiring multiple passes of the laser into each dilated segment to achieve complete ablation. Results Of 1929 great saphenous veins, 334 (17.31%) had a diameter equal to or over 15 mm, which has been recommended as the upper limit for endovenous laser ablation by some clinicians. All were successfully treated and occluded upon short-term follow-up. Conclusion We suggest that incompetent great saphenous veins that need treatment can always be treated with endovenous laser ablation, and open surgery should never be recommended on vein diameter alone.

scholarly journals Treatment of recurrent varicose veins of the great saphenous vein by conventional surgery and endovenous laser ablation

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1106-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura van Groenendael ◽  
J. Adam van der Vliet ◽  
Lizel Flinkenflögel ◽  
Elisabeth A. Roovers ◽  
Steven M.M. van Sterkenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Recurrent Varicose Veins

CHIVA treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency with aneurysm of the great saphenous vein in von Willebrand’s disease

Phlebologie ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (06) ◽  
pp. 371-374
Author(s):  
E. Mendoza
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Von Willebrand's Disease ◽  
Skin Changes ◽  
Von Willebrand’S Disease ◽  
Below The Knee ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Saphenofemoral Junction ◽  
Minor Procedure

SummaryIn patients with an increased tendency to bleeding and severe varicose veins, even the minimally invasive venous procedure CHIVA requires careful planning and risk assessment. CHIVA treatment is reported in a 67-year-old female patient with aneurysm of the great saphenous vein at the saphenofemoral junction, reflux above and below the knee (Hach III), skin changes (C4a) and von Willebrand’s disease. Radiofrequency was used over a 13 cm segment in the proximal great saphenous vein. The result shows a reduction in the diameter of the great saphenous vein at the thigh from 8.2 to 5.4 mm and an absence of reflux and absence of clinic. Even in patients with severe findings, a minor procedure can achieve a good clinical result with low risk.

A new non-tumescent endovenous ablation method for varicose vein treatment: Early results of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (VariClose®)

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alptekin Yasim ◽  
Erdinc Eroglu ◽  
Orhan Bozoglan ◽  
Bulent Mese ◽  
Mehmet Acipayam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Endovenous Ablation ◽  
Vein Diameter

Objective This report aims to present the early results of a retrospective study of the use of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (VariClose®)-based non-tumescent endovenous ablation for the treatment of patients with varicose veins. Method One hundred and eighty patients with varicose veins due to incompetent saphenous veins were treated with the VariClose® endovenous ablation method between May 2014 and November 2014. The patient sample consisted of 86 men and 94 women, with a mean age of 47.7 ± 11.7 years. The patients had a great saphenous vein diameter greater than 5.5 mm and a small saphenous vein diameter greater than 4 mm in conjunction with reflux for more than 0.5 s. Patients with varicose veins were evaluated with venous duplex examination, Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical and Pathophysiological classification (CEAP), and their Venous Clinical Severity Scores were recorded. Results The median CEAP score of patients was three, and the saphenous vein diameters were between 5.5 and 14 mm (mean of 7.7 ± 2.1 mm). A percutaneous entry was made under local anesthesia to the great saphenous vein in 169 patients and to the small saphenous vein in 11 patients. Duplex examination immediately after the procedure showed closure of the treated vein in 100% of the treated segment. No complications were observed. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 months (ranging from three to seven months). Recanalization was not observed in any of the patients during follow-up. The average Venous Clinical Severity Scores was 10.2 before the procedure and decreased to 3.9 after three months (p < 0.001). Conclusion The application of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (VariClose®) is an effective method for treating varicose veins; it yielded a high endovenous closure rate, with no need for tumescent anesthesia. However, long-term results are currently unknown.

Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after ablation with 1470 nm laser: Incidence, progression, and risk factors

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sufian ◽  
A Arnez ◽  
N Labropoulos ◽  
S Lakhanpal
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Vein Diameter ◽  
Saphenofemoral Junction

Objectives To evaluate the incidence of heat-induced thrombosis, its progression and risk factors that may contribute to its formation after endovenous laser ablation. Methods This was a prospective evaluation of all patients who had endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein, accessory saphenous vein, and small saphenous vein using 1470 nm wavelength laser, from March 2010 to September 2011. All patients who developed endovenous heat-induced thrombosis at the saphenofemoral junction or at the saphenopopliteal junction were included. Demographic data, history of venous thrombosis, body mass index, vein diameter, reflux time, catheter tip position, endovenous heat-induced thrombosis progression, number of phlebectomies, and venous clinical severity scores were analyzed. Duplex ultrasound was done in all patients preoperatively, and 2–3 days postoperatively. Results Endovenous laser ablation was performed in 2168 limbs. Fifty-seven percent had great saphenous vein, 13% accessory saphenous vein, and 30% small saphenous vein ablation. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis was developed in 18 limbs (12 at saphenofemoral junction and six at saphenopopliteal junction) for an incidence of 0.9%. Eight were class 1 and 10 were > class 2. No pulmonary embolism was reported. The percentage of men with endovenous heat-induced thrombosis was higher compared to those without (39% vs. 24%, p = .14). The median age for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients was 59.6 compared to non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis ( p = .021). Great saphenous vein/accessory saphenous vein diameter for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients was 8.0 mm versus 6.3 mm for non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients ( p = .014), and for small saphenous vein it was 5.7 mm versus 4.5 mm ( p = .16). Multiple concomitant phlebectomies were performed in 55.6% of the endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients compared to 37% in non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis ( p = .001). All other parameters were similar between endovenous heat-induced thrombosis and non-endovenous heat-induced thrombosis group. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis resolution occurred in 16 cases at 2–4 but two cases progressing from class 1 to 2, before resolution. The mean VCSS score for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis patients preoperatively was 5.6 and improved to 2.8 ( p = .003) at one month. Conclusion Risk factors associated with endovenous heat-induced thrombosis formation after endovenous laser ablation include: vein size, age, and multiple phlebectomies. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis resolves in 2–4 weeks in most patients but it may worsen in few.

scholarly journals A case of recurrent varicose veins due to the multiple fistulas from superficial femoral artery

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2092642
Author(s):  
Satoshi Watanabe ◽  
Takafumi Tsuji ◽  
Shinya Fujita ◽  
Soji Nishio ◽  
Eisho Kyo
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Superficial Femoral Artery ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Skin Pigmentation ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Recurrent Varicose Veins

Recurrent varicose veins are considered to be caused by the recurrence of reflux but rarely may be secondary to other pathologies. A 39-year-old man complained of right lower leg skin pigmentation, pain and fatigue for several years. Duplex ultrasound revealed that the great saphenous vein diameter at the saphenofemoral junction level was 7.7 cm, and at the knee medial level was 14.4 cm. The reflux time at the proximal great saphenousvein level was 1.85 s. Endovenous laser ablation for dilated and refluxed great saphenous vein was performed. However, 1 year later, the symptoms recurred. Duplex ultrasound suspected abnormal arterial flow from the right superficial femoral artery to the recanalized segment of previously ablated great saphenous vein and anterior accessory saphenous vein. One month later, despite the successful re-endovenous laser ablation, the symptoms recurred. Computed tomography angiography showed three fistulous vessels from superficial femoral artery to anterior accessory saphenous vein. Combined treatments with endovenous laser ablation and coil embolization was performed. Ultimately, the fistulas were obliterated and the patient remained free of symptoms. Varicose veins due to the fistulas from superficial femoral artery are rare and difficult to diagnose but can be entirely treated with the percutaneous approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document