scholarly journals A case of recurrent varicose veins due to the multiple fistulas from superficial femoral artery

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2092642
Author(s):  
Satoshi Watanabe ◽  
Takafumi Tsuji ◽  
Shinya Fujita ◽  
Soji Nishio ◽  
Eisho Kyo
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Superficial Femoral Artery ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Skin Pigmentation ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Recurrent Varicose Veins

Recurrent varicose veins are considered to be caused by the recurrence of reflux but rarely may be secondary to other pathologies. A 39-year-old man complained of right lower leg skin pigmentation, pain and fatigue for several years. Duplex ultrasound revealed that the great saphenous vein diameter at the saphenofemoral junction level was 7.7 cm, and at the knee medial level was 14.4 cm. The reflux time at the proximal great saphenousvein level was 1.85 s. Endovenous laser ablation for dilated and refluxed great saphenous vein was performed. However, 1 year later, the symptoms recurred. Duplex ultrasound suspected abnormal arterial flow from the right superficial femoral artery to the recanalized segment of previously ablated great saphenous vein and anterior accessory saphenous vein. One month later, despite the successful re-endovenous laser ablation, the symptoms recurred. Computed tomography angiography showed three fistulous vessels from superficial femoral artery to anterior accessory saphenous vein. Combined treatments with endovenous laser ablation and coil embolization was performed. Ultimately, the fistulas were obliterated and the patient remained free of symptoms. Varicose veins due to the fistulas from superficial femoral artery are rare and difficult to diagnose but can be entirely treated with the percutaneous approach.

scholarly journals Treatment of recurrent varicose veins of the great saphenous vein by conventional surgery and endovenous laser ablation

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1106-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura van Groenendael ◽  
J. Adam van der Vliet ◽  
Lizel Flinkenflögel ◽  
Elisabeth A. Roovers ◽  
Steven M.M. van Sterkenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Recurrent Varicose Veins

Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein – Varying energy may not affect outcome

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos S Nejm ◽  
Jorge RR Timi ◽  
Walter Boim de Araújo ◽  
Filipe C Caron
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Occlusion Rate

Objectives To determine great saphenous vein occlusion rate after endovenous laser ablation using the 1470-nm bare-fiber diode laser to supply either 7 W or 15 W and evaluate procedure-related complications. Method Patients with varicose veins of the lower extremities (CEAP class C2–C6) were randomly assigned to undergo either 7-W (18 patients, 30 limbs) or 15-W (18 patients, 30 limbs) endovenous laser ablation. Duplex ultrasound follow-up was at 3–5 days, 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results Occlusion rate was 100% in both groups at 3–5 days and 1 month and 86.7% in 7-W and 100% in 15-W patients at both 6 and 12 months, with no difference between groups ( p > 0.05). Four (13.3%) 15-W and 3 (10%) 7-W patients had paresthesia at 3–5 days, with no difference between groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusions These preliminary data suggest that both techniques are similarly effective in the treatment of varicose great saphenous veins.

Recurrent varicose veins: Sonography-based re-examination of 210 patients 14 years after ligation and saphenous vein stripping

VASA ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmann ◽  
Klode ◽  
Pfister ◽  
Toussaint ◽  
Weingart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Recurrent Varicose Veins ◽  
Surgical Errors ◽  
Duplex Imaging ◽  
A Minor

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of varicose recurrence 14 years after flush ligation of the saphenofemoral (SFJ) or saphenopopliteal (SPJ) junction with additional stripping of the incompetent saphenous vein. Patients and methods: Our study group comprised 245 extremities of 210 patients operated upon in 1990 for either great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence. Limbs were assessed with Duplex ultrasound by a practitioner other than the original surgeon and relevant patient data was recorded. Results: In 68.5% of re-examined limbs Duplex imaging provided no evidence for recurrent varicose veins at the former SFJ or SPJ. This included 15 legs (= 6.1%) where reflux immediately proximal to the junction but originating from adjacent veins (i.e. pudendal vein, epigastrical vein) was detected. In 31.5%, reflux from the operated SFJ or SPJ (junctional recurrence) was detected but only a minor percentage of legs (6.9%) had actually developed a clinically relevant recurrent varicosity (> 3 mm in diameter) branching out from the former junction and requiring treatment. Patients with a BMI < 30 were less likely to suffer recurrent varicose veins (no recurrence in 72.7%) than patients with a BMI ≥ 30 (no recurrence in 54.5%). Conclusions: 14 years after flush ligation of the SFJ or SPJ with stripping of the incompetent saphenous vein, junctional recurrences were found in less than one-third of re-examined extremities. In the absence of surgical errors, we must assume neovascularisation as cause for these recurrences. Duplex US determined a clinically relevant recurrence (> 3 mm in diameter) in only 7% of limbs. Post-operative varices seem to develop less often after SPJ surgery than after SFJ surgery and according to our data, obesity (BMI ≥ 30) constitutes a significant risk factor.

A comparison of three tumescent delivery systems in endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein

Vascular ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firat H Altin ◽  
Baris Kutas ◽  
Tevfik Gunes ◽  
Selim Aydin ◽  
Bortecin Eygi
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Tumescent Solution ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Different systems for delivering tumescent solution exist in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). This study evaluated three different tumescent delivery systems in patients with primary varicose veins due to great saphenous vein reflux who were treated with EVLA. In this prospective non-randomized study, 60 patients with isolated GSV varicose veins were divided into three groups. All patients received EVLA treatment. Three different tumescent solution delivery systems were used. Systems consisted of a needle and a syringe in Group 1, a needle connected to an infusion bag system in Group 2 and a peristaltic infiltration pump in Group 3. Tumescent delivery durations were in Group 1: 6.56 SD 1.18 minutes, Group 2: 6.05 SD 2.19 minutes and Group 3: 5.19 SD 1.15 minutes ( P = 0.014). In the outcomes of the study there were no significant difference between groups. Although peristaltic pump systems might provide shorter tumescent delivery durations without hand fatigue, shorter duration does not have any practical importance (about 1 minute and also it is not cost-effective. For delivering tumescent solutions in EVLA procedures, there was no major superiority between systems.

The clinical significance of below-knee great saphenous vein reflux following endovenous laser ablation of above-knee great saphenous vein

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
N S Theivacumar ◽  
R J Darwood ◽  
D Dellegrammaticas ◽  
A I D Mavor ◽  
M J Gough
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Residual Symptoms ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Group B

Aims The standard technique for endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins due to great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux involves obliteration of the above-knee (AK) GSV. This study assesses the significance of persistent below-knee (BK) GSV reflux following such therapy. Methods Sixty-nine limbs (64 patients) with varicosities and GSV reflux underwent AK-EVLA. Post treatment, GSV reflux (ultrasound: six, 12 weeks) and Aberdeen varicose vein severity scores (AVVSS, 12 weeks) were assessed, and residual varicosities treated with foam sclerotherapy (six weeks). Results The untreated BK-GSV remained patent in all limbs. Ultrasound showed normal antegrade flow in 34/69 (49%, Group A), flash reflux <1 s in 7/69 (10%, Group B) and >1 s reflux in 28/69 (41%, Group C). Although AVVSS improved in all groups ( P < 0.001): A: 14.6 (8.4–19.3) versus 2.8 (0.5–4.4), B: 13.9 (7.5–20.1) versus 3.7 (2.1–6.8), C: 15.1 (8.9–22.5) versus 8.1 (5.3–12.6) the improvement was less in Group C ( P < 0.001 versus A and B) and was associated with a greater requirement (A: 4/34 [12%]; B: 1/7 [14%]; C: 25/28 [89%]) for sclerotherapy (persisting varicosities) ( P < 0.001). Conclusion Although AK-GSV EVLA improves symptoms regardless of persisting BK reflux, the latter appears responsible for residual symptoms and a greater need for sclerotherapy for residual varicosities.

Factors affecting optimal linear endovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower limb truncal veins – A review of the clinical evidence

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A Cowpland ◽  
Amy L Cleese ◽  
Mark S Whiteley
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Energy Density ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Flow Diagram ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Delivery Technique ◽  
Optimal Linear

Objectives The objective is to identify the factors that affect the optimal linear endovenous energy density (LEED) to ablate incompetent truncal veins. Methods We performed a literature review of clinical studies, which reported truncal vein ablation rates and LEED. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flow diagram documents the search strategy. We analysed 13 clinical papers which fulfilled the criteria to be able to compare results of great saphenous vein occlusion as defined by venous duplex ultrasound, with the LEED used in the treatment. Results Evidence suggests that the optimal LEED for endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein is >80 J/cm and <100 J/cm in terms of optimal closure rates with minimal side-effects and complications. Longer wavelengths targeting water might have a lower optimal LEED. A LEED <60 J/cm has reduced efficacy regardless of wavelength. The optimal LEED may vary with vein diameter and may be reduced by using specially shaped fibre tips. Laser delivery technique and type as well as the duration time of energy delivery appear to play a role in determining LEED. Conclusion The optimal LEED to ablate an incompetent great saphenous vein appears to be >80 J/cm and <95 J/cm based on current evidence for shorter wavelength lasers. There is evidence that longer wavelength lasers may be effective at LEEDs of <85 J/cm.

Endovenous laser ablation is an effective treatment for great saphenous vein incompetence in teenagers

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-202
Author(s):  
Piotr Terlecki ◽  
Stanislaw Przywara ◽  
Marek Iłżecki ◽  
Karol Terlecki ◽  
Piotr Kawecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation

Objectives The current knowledge of chronic venous disease in teenagers and its treatment is very limited. The aim of the study is to present our experience and the available literature data on the treatment of varicose veins in teenagers with endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein. Methods Five patients, aged 15–17 years, were qualified for surgery, based on typical signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease. Minimally invasive treatment with endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein was applied. Results The technical success of surgery was achieved in all patients. Over a 2-year follow-up we did not observe any case of recanalisation of the great saphenous vein, recurrence of varicose veins, or serious complications, such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. One patient presented with resolving of post-operative bruising, and two cases of local numbness were transient. Conclusions Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein in the treatment of chronic venous disease in teenagers is effective and safe. The method provides excellent cosmetic effects, very short recovery time and high levels of patient satisfaction.

scholarly journals Great saphenous vein mechanochemical sclerotherapy versus laser ablation in treatment of varicose vein

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M I Ibrahim ◽  
K A Nabil ◽  
A M Abdalmageed ◽  
G K Hussein
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
High Incidence

Abstract Background Endovenous thermal techniques, such as endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), are the recommended treatment for truncal varicose veins. But it requires the administration of tumescent anaesthesia, which can be uncomfortable. Non-thermal, non-tumescent techniques, such as mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) have some advantages such as less post-procedural pain and less procedure time . MOCA combines physical damage to endothelium using sharply terminated metal claws, with the injection of a liquid sclerosant. Introduction Chronic venous insufficiency is one of the most common medical conditions among highly developed societies. The majority of patients (70%) suffer from saphenous veins incompetency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary efficacy of mechanochemical sclerotherapy by phlebogriffe (flebogrif) in comparison to laser ablation in treatment of varicose vein. Methods/Design The study was conducted on 30 patients, including 16 women and 14 men divided into 2 groups. The first group (15 patients) was treated with ablation with Flebogrif (MOCA) to treat varicose veins. The second group (15 patients) was treated with ablation with Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). All patients were qualified based on the ultrasound in a standing position confirming incompetence of the great saphenous vein or small saphenous vein. The primary outcomes are intra-procedural pain and technical efficacy at 1 year, defined as complete occlusion of target vein segment and assessed using duplex ultrasound. Secondary outcomes are post-procedural pain, analgesia use, procedure time, clinical severity, bruising, complications, satisfaction, time taken to return to daily activities and/or work, and cost-effectiveness analysis following EVLA or MOCA. Both groups will be evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. Results The total primary obliteration rate after 3 days and 1 month was 100% with both EVLA-RTF and MOCA while after 3 months (ms) was 93.3% with both groups. After 6ms the total primary obliteration rate was 93.3% with EVLA-RTF and 86.7% with MOCA. The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) presented similar and durable improvements in both groups between 3days and 6 months. While there is significant less post procedural pain, ecchymosis and bruises with the MOCA method and so high incidence of use of analgesics in EVLA patients than in MOCA group. The median time for return to work was 1 day after both treatments. No severe adverse events were observed. Discussion The aim of the study is to evaluate whether MOCA is superior to EVLA. The two main hypotheses are that MOCA may cause less initial pain and disability allowing rapid post-operative recovery. The second hypothesis is the efficacy, which may lead to increased recurrence and affect longer term quality of life, increasing the requirement for secondary procedures. Conclusions EVLA and MOCA have similarly high great saphenous vein (GSV) obliteration rates in the long term, and the treatments are equally effective clinically. While according to post procedural pain, ecchymosis, Bruises and long procedural time. The study showed significant high incidence of occurrence in EVLA group than MOCA group. So according to these items there is significant superiority of MOCA over EVLA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document