scholarly journals Panenteric capsule endoscopy identifies proximal small bowel disease guiding upstaging and treatment intensification in Crohn’s disease: A European multicentre observational cohort study

2020 ◽  
pp. 205064062094866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foong Way D Tai ◽  
Pierre Ellul ◽  
Alfonso Elosua ◽  
Ignacio Fernandez-Urien ◽  
Gian E Tontini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Small Bowel Disease ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Proximal Small Bowel

Background Endoscopically defined mucosal healing in Crohn’s disease is associated with improved outcomes. Panenteric capsule endoscopy enables a single non-invasive assessment of small and large bowel mucosal inflammation. Aims and methods: This multicentre observational study of patients with suspected and established Crohn’s disease examined the feasibility, safety and impact on patient outcomes of panenteric capsule endoscopy in routine clinical practice. The potential role in assessment of disease severity and extent by a comparison with existing clinical and biochemical markers is examined. Results Panenteric capsule endoscopy was performed on 93 patients (71 with established and 22 with suspected Crohn’s disease). A complete examination occurred in 85% (79/93). Two cases (2.8%) of capsule retention occurred in patients with established Crohn’s disease. Panenteric capsule resulted in management change in 38.7% (36/93) patients, including 64.6% (32/48) of those with an established diagnosis whose disease was active, and all three patients with newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease. Montreal classification was upstaged in 33.8% of patients with established Crohn’s disease and mucosal healing was demonstrated in 15.5%. Proximal small bowel disease upstaged disease in 12.7% and predicted escalation of therapy (odds ratio 40.3, 95% confidence interval 3.6–450.2). Raised C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin were poorly sensitive in detecting active disease (0.48 and 0.59 respectively). Conclusions Panenteric capsule endoscopy was feasible in routine practice and the ability to detect proximal small bowel disease may allow better estimation of prognosis and guide treatment intensification. Panenteric capsule endoscopy may be a suitable non-invasive endoscopic investigation in determining disease activity and supporting management decisions.

scholarly journals P410 Which patients with established Crohn’s disease benefit most from the use of the Patency capsule test prior to small bowel capsule endoscopy?

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S417-S418
Author(s):  
A Elosua Gonzalez ◽  
M Rullan Iriarte ◽  
S Rubio Iturria ◽  
C Rodríguez Gutiérrez ◽  
M Vicuña Arregui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Postoperative Recurrence ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Routine Clinical Setting ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background An important factor that limits a wider utilization of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) in Crohn’s Disease (CD) is the potential risk of retention. The Patency® capsule (PC) lowers the risk of SBCE retention by assessing pre-procedure intestinal patency. Our aims were to evaluate the use of PC in patients with established CD in routine clinical practice and to identify predictive factors of intestinal patency in CD patients. Methods We included all patients with CD followed in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit of the Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra in which a SBCE was performed from 01/01/2008 to 31/12/2019. An intact PC excreted in its original shape within 30 hours after swallowing was considered a positive patency test. Results A total of 465 SBCE were indicated in 333 patients. In 61.9% a previous patency test with PC was performed, with significant differences in its use according to the age at diagnosis according to the Montreal classification (A1 75.9%, A2 64.8%, A3 46.1%) and behaviour (B2 81.3%, B3 80%, B1 54.2%), the indication (postoperative recurrence monitoring 87.2%, flare 65.5%, staging small bowel disease 52.4%, assessing mucosal healing 44.8%) and the presence of previous CD surgery (68.6% vs. 55.6%). In 33 cases (7%) SBCE was contraindicated due to negative patency test. Eleven SBCE were retained of the 432 procedures finally performed (incidence 2.5%; 95% CI 1.06%-4.02%). Retention occurred in 5.6% of procedures without prior PC compared to 0.4% with previous PC (p<0.001). Stricturing disease (OR 2.94; 1.31-6.58), penetrating disease (OR 3.85; 1.59-9.31) and presence of elevated inflammatory markers (OR 3.73; 1.85-7.50) were identified as independent factors associated with retention (negative PC test or SBCE retention) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion A patency test prior to SBCE was performed in 61.9% of patients with known CD. The use of PC is associated with a lower risk of SBCE retention in a routine clinical setting. Patients with stricturing or penetrating disease or elevation of inflammatory markers have significantly higher risk of retention and would therefore benefit from a pre-SBCE PC.

Mo1577 Predictive Model of Small Bowel Disease Detected in Capsule Endoscopy in Patients With Established Crohn's Disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. AB472-AB473
Author(s):  
João Santos-Antunes ◽  
Helder Cardoso ◽  
Bruno Rosa ◽  
Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto ◽  
Susana Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Small Bowel Disease

scholarly journals Panenteric capsule endoscopy versus ileocolonoscopy plus magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn’s disease: a multicentre, prospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000365 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Henry Bruining ◽  
Salvatore Oliva ◽  
Mark R Fleisher ◽  
Monika Fischer ◽  
Joel G Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Terminal Ileum ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Enterography ◽  
Proximal Small Bowel

IntroductionCrohn’s disease diagnosis and monitoring remains a great clinical challenge and often requires multiple testing modalities. Assessing Crohn’s disease activity in the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract using a panenteric capsule endoscopy (CE) system could be used as an alternative to colonoscopy and cross-sectional imaging. This study assessed the accuracy and safety of panenteric CE in Crohn’s disease as compared with ileocolonoscopy (IC) and/or magnetic resonance enterography (MRE).MethodsA prospective, multicentre study was performed in subjects with established Crohn’s disease. Individuals with proven small bowel patency underwent a standardised bowel preparation, followed by CE ingestion and IC either the same or following day. MRE, IC, and CE interpretations were performed by blinded central readers using validated scoring systems. The primary endpoint was the overall sensitivity of CE vs MRE and/or IC in Crohn’s disease subjects.ResultsStudy enrolment included 158 subjects from 21 sites in the USA, Austria, and Israel. Of those, 99 were included in the analysis. Imaging modality scores indicated none to mild inflammation in the proximal small bowel and colon, but discrepant levels of inflammation in the terminal ileum. Overall sensitivity for active enteric inflammation (CE vs MRE and/or IC) was 94% vs 100% (p=0.125) and specificity was 74% vs 22% (p=0.001). Sensitivity of CE was superior to MRE for enteric inflammation in the proximal small bowel (97% vs 71%, p=0.021), and similar to MRE and/or IC in the terminal ileum and colon (p=0.500–0.625). There were seven serious adverse advents of which three were related to the CE device.ConclusionPanenteric CE is a reliable tool for assessing Crohn’s disease mucosal activity and extent compared with more invasive methods. This study demonstrates high performance of the panenteric CE as compared to MRE and/or IC without the need for multiple tests in non-stricturing Crohn’s disease.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov NCT03241368

scholarly journals Outcomes of Bowel Resection in Patients with Crohn's Disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. 1021-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh ◽  
Joseph C. Carmichael ◽  
Steven D. Mills ◽  
Alessio Pigazzi ◽  
Michael J. Stamos
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Large Bowel ◽  
Bowel Resection ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Colonic Disease ◽  
Small Bowel Disease

There is limited data regarding outcomes of bowel resection in patients with Crohn's disease. We sought to investigate complications of such patients after bowel resection. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases were used to examine the clinical data of Crohn's patients who underwent bowel resection during 2002 to 2012. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate outcomes of such patients. We sampled a total of 443,950 patients admitted with the diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Of these, 20.5 per cent had bowel resection. Among patients who had bowel resection, 51 per cent had small bowel Crohn's disease, 19.4 per cent had large bowel Crohn's disease, and 29.6 per cent had both large and small bowel Crohn's disease. Patients with large bowel disease had higher mortality risk compared with small bowel disease [1.8% vs 1%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.42, P < 0.01]. Risks of postoperative renal failure (AOR: 1.56, P < 0.01) and respiratory failure (AOR: 1.77, P < 0.01) were higher in colonic disease compared with small bowel disease but postoperative enteric fistula was significantly higher in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease (AOR: 1.90, P < 0.01). Of the patients admitted with the diagnosis of Crohn's disease, 20.5 per cent underwent bowel resection during 2002 to 2012. Although colonic disease has a higher mortality risk, small bowel disease has a higher risk of postoperative fistula.

scholarly journals P138 Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio index: a reliable tool for non-invasive assessment of endoscopic activity in small bowel Crohn’s Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S225-S225
Author(s):  
V Macedo Silva ◽  
M Freitas ◽  
S Xavier ◽  
T Cúrdia Gonçalves ◽  
P Boal Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Platelet To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Non Invasive

Abstract Background The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) index has been a recent focus of investigation as a reliable marker of inflammation. This score was recently shown to have a good accuracy upon predicting endoscopic remission in patients with colonic Crohn’s Disease (CD). We aimed to assess the discriminative power of PLR index in patients with isolated small bowel CD. Methods Single center study of consecutive patients with isolated small bowel CD (L1 ± L4 disease according to Montreal classification) who underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) for assessment of endoscopic activity between January 2019 and December 2020. Only complete SBCEs were considered. CD endoscopic activity was classified according to the Lewis score (LS) value. Complete blood count, C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin values were collected within 1 month of SBCE. Results Final sample included 49 patients, 35 (71.4%) of them females, with a mean age of 35.1±11.8 years. SBCE reported mucosal healing (LS&lt;135) in 30.6% of the patients; mild activity (135≤LS&lt;790) in 42.9% and moderate-to-severe activity (LS≥790) in 26.5% of the patients. PLR index positive correlation with LS was significant and moderate (k=0.597; p&lt;0.001). This correlation was stronger than the one seen between fecal calprotectin (k=0.525; p=0.001) or C-reactive protein (k=0.321; p=0.029) and the LS score. In particular, PLR index presented an excellent accuracy for predicting patients with a moderate-to-severe endoscopic activity (AUC=0.908; 95%CI=0.816–0.999; p&lt;0.001), with an optimal cut-off of PLR above 157 (sensitivity 92.3%; specificity 82.9%). The accuracy for prediction of mucosal healing was good (AUC=0.743; 95%CI=0.600–0.887; p=0.007), with an optimal cut-off of PLR below 126 (sensitivity 66.7%; specificity 80.0%). Conclusion PLR index demonstrated an excellent acuity for predicting patients with moderate to severe disease in small bowel CD. Moreover, it also demonstrated good acuity for predicting mucosal healing on this set of patients. These results come from a significant correlation of PLR index with endoscopic activity in small bowel CD. Our findings establish this index as a promising and easy-to-apply tool for non-invasive and regular follow-up of patients with small bowel CD.

scholarly journals P096 Which patients with known Crohn’s disease after an ileo-colonoscopy will benefit most from small bowel capsule endoscopy?

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S193-S194
Author(s):  
N Viazis ◽  
A Mountaki ◽  
K Koustenis ◽  
C Veretanos ◽  
K Arvanitis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Terminal Ileum ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Proximal Small Bowel ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Ileo-colonoscopy with biopsies is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease (CD). In contrast, the role of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is limited currently in cases where ileo-colonoscopy and imaging techniques raise doubts on the diagnosis or cannot explain certain clinical manifestations of Crohn’s disease. The aim of our study was to determine whether there are patients with endoscopically confirmed established CD who could get additional benefit by SBCE. Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 6301 patients subjected to SBCE in our department from 1st March 2003 to 18th February 2021. Patients with CD diagnosed by ileo-colonoscopy or total colonoscopy only (because the ileo-caecal valve could not be intubated) prior to SBCE were included in the study and biopsies. SBCE had been performed only in patients who lacked any clinical and/or imaging (CT/MRE) evidence of bowel obstruction. The presence and extent of mucosal lesions, namely local and/or diffuse erythema, erosions and ulcers (aphthous, superficial and/or deep) throughout the small intestine, which may be difficult to identify by traditional imaging, could either explain clinical manifestations unrelated to the findings of colonoscopy or led onto reassessment of applied treatments were sought by SBCE. Results The study sample consisted of 1002 patients (males/females: 511/491, mean age ± SD: 52.6±27.3). Among these, CD had been diagnosed with colonoscopy (and not ileo-colonoscopy) in 293 (29.2%) subjects and small bowel involvement was seen in 104 (35.5%) patients. The vast majority of these patients had lesions only in the terminal ileum (n=81, 77.8%), while the remaining patients (n=23, 22.2%) had additional lesions in more proximal parts of the small bowel. Among the 709 (70.8%) patients in whom CD had been diagnosed by ileo-colonoscopy, lesions in the terminal ileum were found in 407 (57.4 %) patients; SBCE revealed more proximal lesions in 104 patients (25.5%). In the remaining 307 patients (43.3%) in whom ileo-colonoscopy did not reveal terminal ileum involvement, more proximal small bowel lesions were seen in 35 (11.4%) patients. These lesions were mainly apthoid ulcers or larger ulcers, findings that led to a change in therapeutic management in 17 patients (48.6%). Conclusion SBCE identifies more proximal small bowel lesions in a substantial number of patients with CD established by traditional endoscopic techniques. When these lesions are more severe and extensive they may lead onto re-evaluation of the personalized therapeutic strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document