scholarly journals Understanding transitional care provided to older adults with and without dementia: A mixed methods study

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Prusaczyk ◽  
Vanessa Fabbre ◽  
Nancy Morrow-Howell ◽  
Enola Proctor

Introduction There are numerous effective transitional care interventions yet they are not routinely implemented. Furthermore, few interventions exist for older adults with dementia. A first step in developing effective interventions for dementia patients and increasing intervention uptake for all patients is to understand the current delivery process of transitional care. Methods A mixed methods study using an explanatory multiphase design was conducted. Guided by provider interviews, medical charts were reviewed to collect information on the day-to-day transitional care being delivered to older adults. Then providers were interviewed again to assess the accuracy of those results and provide context. Results The medical charts of 210 older adults (126 with dementia and 84 without) were reviewed and nine providers representing various professional roles including social work, nursing, and case management were interviewed. Social workers and case managers were primarily involved in discharge planning, communicating with providers outside the hospital, advanced care planning, providing social and community supports, and making follow-up appointments. Registered nurses were the primary providers of patient education and medication safety while physicians were primarily involved in ensuring that necessary information was available in the discharge summary and that it was available in the chart. Discussion This study found distinct patterns in the delivery of transitional care, including the unique roles nursing, social work, and case management have in the process. Furthermore, these patterns were found to differ between patients with and without dementia. These findings are both consistent and inconsistent with the existing literature on transitional care interventions.

Author(s):  
Amanda M. Clifford ◽  
Joanne Shanahan ◽  
Hilary Moss ◽  
Triona Cleary ◽  
Morgan Senter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 136-137
Author(s):  
Katherine McGilton ◽  
Shirin Vellani ◽  
Alexandra Krassikova ◽  
Alexia Cumal ◽  
Sheryl Robertson ◽  
...  

Abstract Many hospitalized older adults experience delayed discharge. Transitional care programs (TCPs) provide short-term care to these patients to prepare them for transfer to nursing homes or back to the community. There are knowledge gaps related to the processes and outcomes of TCPs. We conducted a scoping review following Arksey & O’Malley’s framework to identify the: 1) characteristics of older patients served by TCPs, 2) services provided within TCPs, and 3) outcomes used to evaluate TCPs. We searched bibliographic databases and grey literature. We included papers and reports involving community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 65 years and examined the processes and/or outcomes of TCPs. The search retrieved 4828 references; 38 studies and 2 reports met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in Europe (n=19) and America (n=13). Patients admitted to TCPs were 59-86 years old, had 2-10 chronic conditions, 26-74% lived alone, the majority were functionally dependent and had mild cognitive impairment. Most TCPs were staffed by nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, social workers and physicians, and support staff. The TCPs provided 5 major types of services: assessment, care planning, treatment, evaluation/care monitoring and discharge planning. The outcomes most frequently assessed were discharge destination, mortality, hospital readmission, length of stay, cost and functional status. TCPs that reported significant improvement in older adults’ functions (which was the main goal of the TCPs) included multiple services delivered by multidisciplinary teams. There is a wide variation in the operationalization of TCPs within and between countries.


SLEEP ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. A268-A268
Author(s):  
M V McPhillips ◽  
J Li ◽  
P Z Cacchione ◽  
V V Dickson ◽  
N S Gooneratne ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 002087282110200
Author(s):  
Kang Liu ◽  
Catherine A Flynn

While the environment is fundamental to humankind’s wellbeing, to date, social work has been largely focused on the social, rather than the physical, environment. To map how the broader environment is captured in the profession’s foundational documents, an exploratory sequential mixed methods study (QUAL → quan) analysed data from 64 social work codes of ethics. Findings indicate that although the environment is mentioned in the majority of these, there is a continued focus on the social, overlooking to some degree the physical, predominantly the built, environment. A more holistic understanding of the environment would enable social work to better fulfil its commitment to human rights and social justice.


JMIR Aging ◽  
10.2196/10973 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. e10973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Eichenberg ◽  
Markus Schott ◽  
Adam Sawyer ◽  
Georg Aumayr ◽  
Manuela Plößnig

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document