scholarly journals Race, Bundled Payment Policy, and Discharge Destination After TKA: The Experience of an Urban Academic Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 215145931880322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Fang ◽  
Eric Hume ◽  
Said Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Discharge Destination ◽  
Bundled Payment ◽  
Bundled Payments ◽  
Care Improvement ◽  
White Patients

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides good clinical outcomes for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis; however, discharge destination after TKA has major implications on postoperative adverse outcomes and readmissions. With the initiation of Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI), it is unclear how racial disparities in discharge destination after TKA will be affected by the new bundled payment for TKA. Methods: Bundled Payments for Care Improvement was implemented in July 01, 2014, at the University of Pennsylvania. We compared differences during early implementation (July 1, 2014, to, March 30, 2016) and during late policy implementation (April 1, 2016, to February 28, 2017) in patient characteristics (including race: African American [AA], white, and other race), discharge destination (skilled nursing facility [SNF], inpatient rehabilitation facility, home, home with home health, or other), and outcomes. Results: We identified 2276 patients who underwent TKA (43.8% AA, 48.2% white, and 8.0% other race). African American patients were more likely to be discharged to SNF as opposed to home than white patients both during the early BPCI (AA: 53.0%, n = 320; white: 32.4%, n = 210, P < .05) and late BPCI implementation (AA: 44.4%, n = 169, white: 26.9%, n = 120, P < .05), though all races showed trends to decreasing SNF use during the late BPCI implementation. Discussion: There were no significant differences in readmissions, length of stay, mortality, or intensive care unit days during early and late implementation of BPCI or when AA patients were compared to white patients. Conclusion: We found no significant changes in racial variations in discharge destination and outcomes after elective TKA. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement has encouraged better preoperative preparation of patients and discharge planning; however, payment reforms alone might not be sufficient to address variation in post-op management following elective surgery.

Medicare bundles for arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6 Supple A) ◽  
pp. 119-125
Author(s):  
Bryan D. Springer ◽  
Jordan McInerney
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Target Price ◽  
High Performing ◽  
Bundled Payment ◽  
Bundled Payments ◽  
Care Improvement

Aims There is concern that aggressive target pricing in the new Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) penalizes high-performing groups that had achieved low costs through prior experience in bundled payments. We hypothesize that this methodology incorporates unsustainable downward trends on Target Prices and will lead to groups opting out of BPCI Advanced in favour of a traditional fee for service. Methods Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data, we compared the Target Price factors for hospitals and physician groups that participated in both BPCI Classic and BPCI Advanced (legacy groups), with groups that only participated in BPCI Advanced (non-legacy). With rebasing of Target Prices in 2020 and opportunity for participants to drop out, we compared retention rates of hospitals and physician groups enrolled at the onset of BPCI Advanced with current enrolment in 2020. Results At its peak in July 2015, 342 acute care hospitals and physician groups participated in Lower Extremity Joint Replacement (LEJR) in BPCI Classic. At its peak in March 2019, 534 acute care hospitals and physician groups participated in LEJR in BPCI Advanced. In January 2020, only 14.5% of legacy hospitals and physician groups opted to stay in BPCI Advanced for LEJR. Analysis of Target Price factors by legacy hospitals during both programmes demonstrates that participants in BPCI Classic received larger negative adjustments on the Target Price than non-legacy hospitals. Conclusion BPCI Advanced provides little opportunity for a reduction in cost to offset a reduced Target Price for efficient providers, as made evident by the 85.5% withdrawal rate for BPCI Advanced. Efficient providers in BPCI Advanced are challenged by the programme’s application of trend and efficiency factors that presumes their cost reduction can continue to decline at the same rate as non-efficient providers. It remains to be seen if reverting back to Medicare fee for service will support the same level of care and quality achieved in historical bundled payment programmes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):119–125.

2020 John N. Insall Award: Removal of total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list adversely affects bundled payment programmes

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (6_Supple_A) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Yayac ◽  
Nicholas Schiller ◽  
Matthew S. Austin ◽  
P. Maxwell Courtney
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Inpatient ◽  
Target Price ◽  
Bundled Payment ◽  
Bundled Payments ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Care Improvement ◽  
The Impact

Aims The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Medicare Inpatient Only (IPO) list on our Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative in 2018. Methods We examined our institutional database to identify all Medicare patients who underwent primary TKA from 2017 to 2018. Hospital inpatient or outpatient status was cross-referenced with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) claims data. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between patients classified as ‘outpatient’ and ‘inpatient’ TKA. Episode-of-care BPCI costs were then compared from 2017 to 2018. Results Of the 2,135 primary TKA patients in 2018, 908 (43%) were classified as an outpatient and were excluded from BPCI. Inpatient classified patients had longer mean length of stay (1.9 (SD 1.4) vs 1.4 (SD 1.7) days, p < 0.001) and higher rates of discharge to rehabilitation (17% vs 3%, p < 0.001). Post-acute care costs increased when comparing the BPCI patients from 2017 to 2018, ($5,037 (SD $7,792) vs $5793 (SD $8,311), p = 0.010). The removal of TKA from the IPO list turned a net savings of $53,805 in 2017 into a loss of $219,747 in 2018 for our BPCI programme. Conclusions Following the removal of TKA from the IPO list, nearly half of the patients at our institution were inappropriately classified as an outpatient. Our target price was increased and our institution realized a substantial loss in 2018 BPCI despite strong quality metrics. CMS should address its negative implications on bundled payment programmes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):19–23.

scholarly journals Overlap between Medicare’s Voluntary Bundled Payment and Accountable Care Organization Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 356-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol S Navathe ◽  
Claire Dinh ◽  
Sarah E Dykstra ◽  
Rachel M Werner ◽  
Joshua M Liao
Keyword(s):  
Policy Implications ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Accountable Care ◽  
Bundled Payment ◽  
Bundled Payments ◽  
Medicare Data ◽  
Shared Savings ◽  
Care Improvement ◽  
Medicare Shared Savings Program ◽  
A Share

Accountable care organizations (ACOs) and bundled payments represent prominent value-based payment models, but the magnitude of overlap between the two models has not yet been described. Using Medicare data, we defined overlap based on attribution to Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACOs and hospitalization for Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) episodes at BPCI participant hospitals. Between 2013 and 2016, overlap as a share of ACO patients increased from 2.7% to 10% across BPCI episodes, while overlap as a share of all bundled payment patients increased from 19% to 27%. Overlap from the perspectives of both ACO and bundled payments varied by specific episode. In the first description of overlap between ACOs and bundled payments, one in every ten MSSP patients received care under BPCI by the end of our study period, whereas more than one in every four patients receiving care under BPCI were also attributed to MSSP. Policymakers should consider strategies to address the clinical and policy implications of increasing payment model overlap.

‘Bundle busters’

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Wodowski ◽  
C. E. Pelt ◽  
J. A. Erickson ◽  
M. B. Anderson ◽  
J. M. Gililland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Bundled Payment ◽  
Bundled Payments ◽  
Preoperative Risk Factors ◽  
Physical Status Classification ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
American Society ◽  
Care Improvement

Aims The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative has identified pathways for improving the value of care. However, patient-specific modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors may increase costs beyond the target payment. We sought to identify risk factors for exceeding our institution’s target payment, the so-called ‘bundle busters’. Patients and Methods Using our data warehouse and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data we identified all 412 patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty and qualified for our institution’s BPCI model, between July 2015 and May 2017. Episodes where CMS payments exceeded the target payment were considered ‘busters’ (n = 123). Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a modified Poisson regression analysis. Results An increased risk of exceeding the target payment was significantly associated with increasing age (adjusted RR 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.06) and body mass index (adjusted RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.003 to 1.06). Eight comorbid risk factors were also identified (all p < 0.05), only two of which were considered to be potentially modifiable (diabetes with complications and preoperative anaemia). An American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification system (ASA) score ≥ 3 (adjusted RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.18) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3 (adjusted RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.60) were risk factors for bundle busting. Conclusion Non-modifiable preoperative risk factors can increase costs and exceed the target payment. Future bundled payment models should incorporate the stratification of risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):64–69

Association of AM-PAC “6-Clicks” Basic Mobility and Daily Activity Scores With Discharge Destination

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan Warren ◽  
Jeff Knecht ◽  
Joseph Verheijde ◽  
James Tompkins
Keyword(s):  
Daily Activity ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Occupational Therapist ◽  
Good Prediction ◽  
Discharge Destination ◽  
Cut Point

Abstract Objective Using AM-PAC “6-Clicks” scores at initial physical therapist and/or occupational therapist evaluation to assess: (1) predictive ability for community versus institution discharge and (2) association with discharge destination (home/self-care [HOME], home health [HHA], skilled nursing facility [SNF], and inpatient rehabilitation facility [IRF]). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, initial “6-Clicks” Basic Mobility (6CBM) and/or Daily Activity (6CDA) t scores and discharge destination were obtained from electronic health records of 17,546 inpatient admissions receiving physical therapy/occupational therapy at an academic hospital between 10/1/15–8/31/18. For objective (1), postacute discharge destination was dichotomized to community (HOME and HHA) and institution (SNF and IRF). Receiver operator characteristic curves determined the most predictive 6CBM and 6CDA scores for discharge destination. For objective (2), adjusted odds ratios (OR) from multinomial logistic regression assessed association between discharge destination (HOME, HHA, SNF, IRF) and cut-point scores for 6CBM (≤40.78 vs &gt; 40.78) and 6CDA (≤40.22 vs &gt; 40.22), accounting for patient and clinical characteristics. Results Area under the curve (AUC) for 6CBM was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.80–0.81) and 6CDA was 0.81 (95% CI = 0.80–0.82). The best cut-point for 6CBM was 40.78 (raw score = 16; sensitivity = 0.71 and specificity = 0.74) and for 6CDA was 40.22 (raw score = 19; sensitivity = 0.68 and specificity = 0.79). 6CBM and 6CDA were significantly associated with discharge destination, with those above the cut-point resulting in increased odds of discharge HOME. The 6CBM scores ≤ 40.78 had higher odds of discharge to HHA (OR = 1.7 [95% CI = 1.5–1.9]), SNF (OR = 7.8 [95% CI = 6.8–8.9]), and IRF (OR = 7.5 [95% CI = 6.3–9.1]) 6CDA scores ≤ 40.22 had higher odds of discharge to HHA (OR = 1.8 [95% CI = 1.7–2.0]), SNF (OR = 8.9 [95% CI = 7.9–10.0]), and IRF (OR = 11.4 [95% CI = 9.7–13.5]). Conclusions “6-Clicks” at physical therapist/occupational therapist initial evaluation demonstrated good prediction for discharge decisions. Higher scores were associated with discharge to HOME; lower scores reflected discharge to settings with increased support levels. Impact Initial 6CBM and 6CDA scores are valuable clinical tools in the determination of discharge destination.

Abstract TP309: Creating a Crystal Ball: Predicting Successful Rehabilitation for Optimal Discharge Placement

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ermak ◽  
Raymond Reichwein ◽  
Alicia Richardson ◽  
Kathy Morrison ◽  
Travis Lehman
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Bundled Payment ◽  
Successful Rehabilitation ◽  
Care Improvement ◽  
Post Acute Care

Introduction: In 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) launched the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) program. Our institution is contracted for a 90 day stroke bundle, making us responsible for all Medicare stroke patient costs. Quarterly review of 2015 financial data (DRG 64 & 65) revealed a significant spend occurs in the post-acute care phase. Methods: Detailed analysis and sequencing revealed that of the 40% of patients discharged to an Inpatient Rehab Facility (IRF) 31% were unsuccessful in rehabilitation and instead transitioned to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). Had SNF been initially selected, a cost avoidance of $292,650 would have been appreciated. Conclusion: Involvement in the BPCI program has provided insight into the post-acute care of stroke patients. With the advent of BPCI, institutions will be increasingly held fiscally responsible for post-acute care delivery. Ongoing retrospective chart review and collaboration with Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation colleagues is underway to identify key indicators that would project successful rehabilitation. Analysis will include comparison between those who were successfully discharged home after an IRF stay to those that needed a SNF after an IRF stay. This would provide inpatient teams with strategies for predicting the optimal discharge location for stroke patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document