scholarly journals Intraoperative Nerve Stimulation During Brachial Plexus Surgery: Comparison Between a Totally Disposable Nerve Stimulator and Nerve Stimulator Normally Used for Nerve Blocks

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-174
Author(s):  
Ahmed Thallaj ◽  
Wadha M. Alotaibi ◽  
Tariq AlZahrani ◽  
Abdulaziz S. Abaalkhail ◽  
Amel A. F. El-Sayed ◽  
...  

Background: Intraoperative nerve stimulation is done routinely in brachial plexus and peripheral nerve surgery as well as in selective neurectomy in spastic patients. Objective: The current study compares the use of 2 different devices for nerve stimulation: a totally disposable nerve stimulator and a nerve stimulator used for nerve blocks by anesthetists. Methods: A retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent brachial plexus surgery: In 30 patients, we used the totally disposable nerve stimulator (group 1) and in another 30 patients, we used the anesthesia device (group 2). The cost of disposable materials used for nerve stimulation was calculated in each group. The same surgeon performed all operations, and he was asked to give his subjective opinion regarding the convenience and ease of use of the device in each group. Results: The main advantages of the totally disposable device are its placement totally within the sterile field, and it is operated by the surgeon without the need to communicate with the anesthetist. However, the totally disposable device had several major disadvantages when compared to the anesthesia device. Firstly, the disposable stimulator can only deliver 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA stimuli, while the anesthesia device can deliver stimuli of 0.1 to 5 mA (in 0.1 mA increments). Secondly, the disposable stimulator frequently fails to operate during surgery, and this is not experienced with the anesthesia device. Finally, the cost of disposables is less using the anesthesia device. Conclusion: Our center has stopped using the disposable nerve stimulator in favour for the anesthesia device.

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Luyet ◽  
G. Schüpfer ◽  
M. Wipfli ◽  
R. Greif ◽  
M. Luginbühl ◽  
...  

Little is known about the learning of the skills needed to perform ultrasound- or nerve stimulator-guided peripheral nerve blocks. The aim of this study was to compare the learning curves of residents trained in ultrasound guidance versus residents trained in nerve stimulation for axillary brachial plexus block. Ten residents with no previous experience with using ultrasound received ultrasound training and another ten residents with no previous experience with using nerve stimulation received nerve stimulation training. The novices' learning curves were generated by retrospective data analysis out of our electronic anaesthesia database. Individual success rates were pooled, and the institutional learning curve was calculated using a bootstrapping technique in combination with a Monte Carlo simulation procedure. The skills required to perform successful ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block can be learnt faster and lead to a higher final success rate compared to nerve stimulator-guided axillary brachial plexus block.


2007 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. e142
Author(s):  
K. Roome ◽  
L.C. Bainbridge ◽  
N.J. Smith

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu-hao Zhang ◽  
Yu-jie Li ◽  
Wenquan He ◽  
Chunyong Yang ◽  
Jianteng Gu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Ultrasound-guidance might decrease the incidence of local anesthetics systemic toxicity(LAST) for many peripheral nerve blocks compared to nerve stimulation. However, it remained uncertain whether ultrasound-guidance would be superior to the nerve stimulation for deep nerve block in the lower extremity. This study was designed to investigate that deep nerve block with ultrasound-guidance would result in a lower rate of LAST comparing to that with nerve stimulator-guidance. Methods: Three hundred patients who were for elective lower limb surgery and desiring lumbar plexus blocks(LPBs) and sciatic nerve blocks(SNBs) were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive LPB and SNB with ultrasound-guidance (Group U), nerve stimulator-guidance (Group N) and dual-guidance (Group M). The primary outcome was the incidence of the LAST. The secondary outcomes were number of needle redirections, motor and sensory block onset and restoration times in the nerve distributions, and associated risk factors. Results: There were 18 patients with the LAST, including 12 in group U, 4 in group N and 2 in group M. For multiple comparisons among the tree groups, we found that the incidence of LAST in group U(12%) was significantly higher than that in group N(4%)(P=0.037) and group M(2%)(P=0.006). The OR of LAST with HBV infection and female gender was 3.352(95% CI,1.233-9.108, P=0.013 ) and 9.488(95% CI,2.142-42.093, P=0.0004), respectively. Conclusions: For patients undergoing LPBs and SNBs, use of ultrasound may increase the incidence of the LAST. HBV infection and female gender were risk factors for deep nerve block. Trial registration: This study was approved by the human research review committee at the southwest hospital of third military medical university. The protocol was registered prospectively with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-16008099) on March 15th,2016. Keywords: Ultrasound; nerve stimulation; nerve block; female; HBV; LAST


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naftáli Silva Fernandes ◽  
Simone Rodrigues Barbosa ◽  
Maria Gláucia Carlos de Oliveira ◽  
Fábio Franco Almeida ◽  
Desirée Coelho De Mello Seal ◽  
...  

Background: Locoregional anesthesia techniques enable the performance of procedures in the distal portion of the limbs, through the parenteral administration of local anesthetic nerve block. There are devices that can increase the effectiveness of these blocks by accurately locating the nerves. These devices include peripheral nerve stimulators, which enable anesthetic to be injected near the plexus, thus reducing the volume of anesthetic required and allowing for the specific blockade of a nerve branch by desensitizing exclusively the area of interest. This paper describes the use of nerve stimulator in the brachial plexus block (BPB) of a calf subjected to amputation of the left foreleg.Case: A newborn calf weighing 30 kg, with a history of injury to the left foreleg, was treated at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal Rural University of the Semi-Arid Region. Clinical and X-ray examinations revealed a fracture in the medial portion of the metacarpus and radiographic alterations indicative of osteomyelitis, so amputation of the affected limb was recommended. Prior the beginning, during and after the surgical procedure, the animal was submitted to the evaluation of its physiological parameters (heart and respiratory rate, capillary refill time, diastolic, systolic and mean blood pressure and rectal temperature). Because it is a newborn animal, it was decided not to pre-operatively fast. After applying preanesthetic medication (xylazine 0.01 mg/kg IV), anesthesia was induced with ketamine (2 mg/kg IV) and midazolam (0.3 mg/kg IV) and maintained with isoflurane. For the brachial plexus block, 0.4 mL/kg (1.5 mg/kg) of 0.375% bupivacaine was used and aided by a peripheral nerve stimulator to generate 10 mA current, 1 HZ frequency and 100 μs pulse duration, coupled to a nerve stimulation needle, it was possible to observe flexion movements of the limb. The stimulus was decreased until movements were triggered at currents lower than 5 mA and nonexistent at 2 mA, whereupon the anesthetic solution was slowly injected. The blockade promoted anesthesia of the entire distal region of the scapulohumeral joint after 30 min, providing supplemental analgesia throughout the surgical procedure, whose effect persisted up to 6 h after the blockade, thus enabling amputation surgery of the limb. The anesthetic recovery was smooth and without signs of excitation. Post-operatory therapy was dipyrone (25 mg / kg) intravenously (IV), every 12 h for five days, meloxicam (0.5 mg / kg) IV every 24 h for three days; and morphine (0.1 mg / kg) intramuscularly every 6 h for three days.Discussion: The use of nerve stimulation enabled the safe and effective use of BPB in a calf subjected to forelimb amputation surgery. In terms of its analgesic contribution during the intraoperative period, the effectiveness of the blockade was satisfactory, considering that the animal presented no variations in the parameters evaluated during the entire surgical period, when compared to those obtained in the preoperative, and no supplemental analgesic was needed during the surgery. In cattle, BPB is usually performed using a blind approach, using anatomical points as references for its execution, and the anesthesiologist’s experience and skills are a determining factor in the success rate of the technique. Nerve stimulator-guided plexus block is still rarely used in ruminants, and is described experimentally only in sheep, using a technique similar to that employed for dogs, which means this is a pioneering technique in calves.Naftáli Silva Fernandes, Simone Rodrigues Barbosa, Maria Gláucia Carlos de Oliveira, Fábio Franco Almeida, Desirée Coelho de Mello Seal, Ugo Monteiro de Moraes, Luã Barbalho de Macêdo &Valéria Veras de Paula


The article is devoted to reengineering of technological processes - a method of their qualitative transformation on an innovative basis, which in turn assumes the availability of tools that make it possible to establish the economic efficiency and technical capability of such transformations of construction production, to identify the effect of their implementation. In this regard, the problem of forming a parametric model of reengineering of construction technological processes, which involves four enlarged groups of indicators that reflect the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the processes: materials used, working time, machine time, spatial organization, is considered. It is established that parameters can have either an absolute (physical, cost) or relative (point, percentage) expression and also make their own decomposition. The practical significance of the provisions given in the article is determined by the development of methods of technical rationing, which leads to a reduction in the cost and duration of construction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  

Introduction: Vagus nerve stimulation is a palliative treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy to reduce the frequency and intensity of seizures. A bipolar helical electrode is placed around the left vagus nerve at the cervical level and is connected to the pulse generator placed in a subcutaneous pocket, most commonly in the subclavian region. Methods: Between March 1998 and October 2019, we performed 196 procedures related to the vagal nerve stimulation at the Neurosurgery Department in Motol University Hospital. Of these, 126 patients were vagal nerve stimulator implantation surgeries for intractable epilepsy. The cases included 69 female and 57 male patients with mean age at the time of the implantation surgery 22±12.4 years (range 2.1−58.4 years). Results: Nine patients (7.1%) were afflicted by complications related to implantation. Surgical complications included postoperative infection in 1.6%, VNS-associated arrhythmias in 1.6%, jugular vein bleeding in 0.8% and vocal cord paresis in 2.4%. One patient with vocal cord palsy also suffered from severe dysphagia. One patient (0.8%) did not tolerate extra stimulation with magnet due to a prolonged spasm in his throat. The extra added benefit of vagus stimulation in one patient was a significant reduction of previously regular severe headaches. Conclusion: Vagus nerve stimulation is an appropriate treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for focal resective surgery. Implantation of the vagus nerve stimulator is a relatively safe operative procedure.


2014 ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
Van Minh Nguyen

Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and side effects, complications of interscalene brachial plexus block with a nerve stimulator for clavicular fracture surgery. Materials and Methods:In a prospective descriptive study, fifty patients received interscalene brachial plexus block for fixation of clavicle fracture. The dose was 7 mg/kg of 1% lidocaine mixed with 1 : 200000 adrenaline. Results:The success rate was 94%, including 4% of patients needed sedation and small amount of narcotic, failure rate was 6%. The minimal stimulating current of the nerve location was 0.46 ±0.08 mA, the onset time of sensory block was 8.86 ±2.65min. There were 3 complications with one Horner’s syndrome and two hoarsenesses. Conclusion:We found that in patients undergoing fixation of clavicle fracture the interscalene block with a nerve stimulator was an effective anesthetic with a low rate of side effects and complications. Key words:Interscalene block, nerve stimulator, clavicular fracture surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document