scholarly journals Surgical Repair of Distal Triceps Tendon Injuries: Short-term to Midterm Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Perioperative Complications

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596711983999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Waterman ◽  
Robert S. Dean ◽  
Shreya Veera ◽  
Brian J. Cole ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Tendon Injuries ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Triceps Tendon

Background: Few large-scale series have described functional outcomes after distal triceps tendon repair. Predictors for operative success and a comparative analysis of surgical techniques are limited in the reported literature. Purpose: To evaluate short-term to midterm functional outcomes after distal triceps tendon repair in a broad patient population and to comparatively evaluate patient-reported outcomes in patients with and without pre-existing olecranon enthesopathy while also assessing for modifiable risk factors associated with adverse patient outcomes and/or revision surgery. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 69 consecutive patients who underwent surgical repair of distal triceps tendon injuries at a single institution. Demographic information, time from injury to surgery, mechanism of injury, extent of the tear, pre-existing enthesopathy, perioperative complications, and validated patient-reported outcome scores were included in the analysis. Patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Results: The most common mechanisms of injury were direct elbow trauma (44.9%), extension/lifting exercises (20.3%), overuse (17.4%), and hyperflexion or hyperextension (17.4%). Eighteen patients were identified with pre-existing symptomatic enthesopathy, and 51 tears were caused by an acute injury. A total of 36 complete and 33 partial tendon tears were identified. Bone tunnels were most commonly used (n = 30; 43.5%), while direct sutures (n = 23; 33.3%) and suture anchors (n = 13; 18.8%) were also used. Perioperative complications occurred in 21.7% of patients, but no patients experienced a rerupture at the time of final follow-up. No statistically significant relationship was found between patient age ( P = .750), degree of the tear ( P = .613), or surgical technique employed ( P = .608) and the presence of perioperative complications. Conclusion: Despite the heightened risk of perioperative complications after primary repair of distal triceps tendon injuries, the current series found favorable functional outcomes and no cases of reruptures at short-term to midterm follow-up. Furthermore, age, surgical technique, extent of the tear, and mechanism of injury were not associated with adverse patient outcomes in this investigation. Pre-existing triceps enthesopathy was shown to be associated with increased complication rates.

scholarly journals Surgical Repair of Distal Triceps Tendon Injuries: Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Re-Rupture Rate

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Robert Waterman ◽  
Robert Dean ◽  
Shreya S. Veera ◽  
Brian J. Cole ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Tendon Injuries ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Bone Tunnels ◽  
Triceps Tendon

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of distal triceps tendon repairs, as well as to describe perioperative risk profile and re-rupture rates among those with or without pre-existing enthesopathy. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical repair of traumatic triceps tendon injuries between 2008 and 2016 were identified from the surgical database at a single institution. The electronic medical records were queried to determine demographic information, time from injury, mechanism of injury, extent of tear, pre-existing enthesopathy, and postoperative complications. Patients with arthritis, concomitant ligament surgery, and/or secondary rupture following previous elbow surgery were excluded. Follow-up outcome measures included the Mayo Elbow, Disabilities of the Arm, Hand, and Shoulder (QuickDASH), Veterans RAND (VR/SF-12), and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) scores with a minimum of 1-year follow up. Results: A total of 88 patients (83 males, 5 females) with mean age of 47 years (range, 14-74) were identified with distal triceps tendon repairs at an average of 49 days (range, 1 to 3650 days) after injury. Sixty-nine patients (76.1%) returned for follow-up at average 3.99 years post-operatively (SD, 2.51). The most common mechanisms of injury were direct elbow trauma (45.4%), extension/lifting exercises (18.1%), overuse (13.6%), and hyperflexion or hyperextension (14.8%). Twenty patients were identified with pre-existing, symptomatic enthesophytes, and 68 tears were caused by acute injury; A total of 42 and 46 partial tendon tears were identified (Table 1). Bone tunnels were most commonly used (n=42, 47.7%), while direct sutures (n=31, 35.2%) and suture anchors (n=12, 13.6%) were also used. Postoperative complications occurred in 23.9% of patients, but no patients experienced re-rupture at time of final follow-up. Final postoperative patient-reported outcome measures are noted in Table 1. No statistically significant correlation was found between patient age (p=0.750), degree of tear (p=0.870), or surgical technique (p=0.740) and presence of perioperative complications. Conclusion: Despite heightened risk of perioperative complications after primary repair of distal triceps tendon injuries, the current series identifies favorable functional outcomes and no cases of re- rupture at short- to mid-term follow-up. Furthermore, age, surgical technique, and extent of tear were not associated with adverse patient outcomes in this investigation. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Type VIII Slap Repair: Patient-Reported Outcomes Of 34 Patients With Minimum 4-year Follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0017
Author(s):  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Mitchell Stephen Fourman ◽  
Steven Bayer ◽  
Darren L. De SA ◽  
Dharmesh Vyas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Functional Score ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Type Viii ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Patient Reported

Objectives: Type VIII superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears - described as SLAP II injuries with posterior extension of the labral tear to the 6 o’clock aspect of the glenoid - have been shown in short-term outcome work to be a source of noted shoulder instability, pain, and reduced function/range of motion in both throwing and non-throwing athletes. Limiting our evaluation and effective treatment of these injuries in both the professional athlete and weekend warrior is our lack of mid- and long-term post-operative outcomes after surgical repair. It is hypothesized that Type VIII SLAP repairs would fare poorly, particularly in the throwing cohort, at mid- to long-term follow-up. Methods: With a minimum 4-year follow-up after Type VIII SLAP repair by a single surgeon, return to sport, KJOC, ASES, stability, range of motion, and pain were compared between throwers, contact, and non-contact athletes. Results: With an average follow-up of 6.2 years, 34 athletes (19 throwers, 5 contact athletes, 10 non-contact athletes), with a mean age of 24.4 years were evaluated. Significant (p < .0001) improvements were observed between pre- and post-operative pain, range of motion, and ASES total and functional scores in throwers and non-throwers. Stability improved but was not significant (Table 1). There were no post-operative differences between throwers and non-throwers (Table 2). Pre-operative ASES functional score was significantly lower in contact athletes than in throwers and non-contact athletes (p < .01), but post-operatively improved significantly with no difference between groups (Table 3, 4). Overall, there was no difference in return to sport between groups as 73.7% of throwers and 93.3% of non-throwers returned (Table 4) and 62.5% of throwers and 57.9% of non-throwers (p = .73) returned to the same level. Further, 89.5% of throwers and 100% of non-throwers (p = .49) said that their surgery was worthwhile. Conclusion: Given the paucity of literature, current surgical outcomes of athletes who have undergone Type VIII SLAP repairs is limited, particularly in mid- and long-term function and return to sport. The current findings suggest that surgical repair of Type VIII SLAP lesions contributes to significant improvements in pain, function, and shoulder range of motion that persists >4 years after repair. However, stability changes after injury appear more chronic in nature. Further, thrower and non-throwers appear to have similar outcomes, which has not previously been seen in short term studies. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

The surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (10) ◽  
pp. 1419-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wood ◽  
Sofie R. French ◽  
Selin Munir ◽  
Rajiv Kaila
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Median Score ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Partial Tears ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Proximal Hamstring

Aims Despite the increase in the surgical repair of proximal hamstring tears, there exists a lack of consensus in the optimal timing for surgery. There is also disagreement on how partial tears managed surgically compare with complete tears repaired surgically. This study aims to compare the mid-term functional outcomes in, and operating time required for, complete and partial proximal hamstring avulsions, that are repaired both acutely and chronically. Methods This is a prospective series of 156 proximal hamstring surgical repairs, with a mean age of 48.9 years (21.5 to 78). Functional outcomes were assessed preinjury, preoperatively, and postoperatively (six months and minimum three years) using the Sydney Hamstring Origin Rupture Evaluation (SHORE) score. Operating time was recorded for every patient. Results Overall, significant improvements in SHORE scores were seen at both six months and mid-term follow-up. Preoperatively, acute patients (median score 27.1 (interquartile range (IQR) 22.9)) reported significantly poorer SHORE scores than chronic patients (median score 42.9 (IQR 22.1); p < 0.001). However, this difference was not maintained postoperatively. For partial tears, acutely repaired patients reported significantly lower preoperative SHORE scores compared to chronically reapired partial tears (median score 24.3 (IQR 15.7) vs median score 40.0 (IQR 25.0); p < 0.001) but also significantly higher SHORE scores at six-month follow-up compared to chronically repaired partial tears (median score 92.9 (IQR 10.7) vs. median score 82.9 (IQR 14.3); p < 0.001). For complete tears, there was only a difference in preoperative SHORE scores between acute and chronic groups. Overall, acute repairs had a significantly shorter operating time (mean 64.67 minutes (standard deviation (SD) 12.99)) compared to chronic repairs (mean 74.71 minutes (SD = 12.0); t = 5.12, p < 0.001). Conclusion Surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions successfully improves patient reported functional outcomes in the majority of patients, irrespective of the timing of their surgery or injury classification. However, reducing the time from injury to surgery is associated with greater improvement in patient outcomes and an increased likelihood of returning to preinjury functional status. Acute repair appears to be a technically less complex procedure, as indicated by reduced operating times, postoperative neurological symptoms and number of patients requiring bracing. Acute repair is therefore a preference among many surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1419–1427.

Evaluating Immediate and Short-Term Postoperative Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Ulnar Shortening for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome Using PROMIS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Bernstein ◽  
Richard D. Lander ◽  
Warren C. Hammert
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Appreciable Change ◽  
Preoperative Visit ◽  
Ulnar Impaction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Average Change ◽  
Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Abstract Background The early recovery trajectory of patients undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is unknown. Questions/Purposes Using PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression, we asked (1) do patients undergoing operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome present at their preoperative visit with notable impairment?; (2) At immediate follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity?; and (3) At short-term follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity? Patients and Methods We identified patients from 01/2017 to 12/2019 at our institution undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome who completed all PROMIS domains at a preoperative visit and at least one postoperative time point (i.e., less than 4 weeks and/or greater than 12 weeks). Distribution- and anchor-based minimal clinically important difference estimates were used to evaluate clinically appreciable changes in symptoms over time. Results A total of 38 patients met our inclusion criteria. The average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores from preoperative to immediate postoperative follow-up were –3.8, –4.3, 3.2, and 0.5, respectively. However, by short-term follow-up, the average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores were 3.7, 3.2, –4.7, and –3.9, respectively. Conclusions Patients have worsening function at the immediate postoperative follow-up. By short-term postoperative follow-up, functional status and PI levels improve. Our findings can help hand surgeons provide evidence-based guidance on expected initial recovery following operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome. Level of Evidence This is a level II, prognostic study.

Midterm Outcomes following Acute Repair of Grade III Distal MCL Avulsions in Multiligamentous Knee Injuries

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (08) ◽  
pp. 785-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal S. Desai ◽  
Isabella T. Wu ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Bruce A. Levy ◽  
Michael J. Stuart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Grade Iii

AbstractThere is limited evidence guiding management of medial collateral ligament (MCL) avulsions or functional disruptions distal to the medial joint line. This study aims to determine outcomes of a series of patients with grade III distal MCL injuries managed with acute surgical repair. Patients with grade III, distal MCL injuries, with or without multiligament involvement were identified. Demographic, clinical examination, and midterm patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Clinical follow-up included physical examination and ligamentous stress testing at a minimum of 6 months. PROs included Lysholm's knee scoring scale, Tegner's activity score, and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores at minimum of 2 years follow-up. Of the 24 eligible patients, outcomes data were available for 20 (83%). Of the 20 included patients, 16 had a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, 3 had ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries, and 1 had an isolated MCL injury. Mean time from injury to surgery was 5 weeks. At mean clinical follow-up of 20.3 months, all patients showed valgus stability and satisfactory range of motion (ROM). Anteroposterior stability was normal in all but one patient who demonstrated a 2+ posterior drawer but with firm end points. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 years for PROs, mean Lysholm's score was 91.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 12.2), median Tegner's activity score was 7 (range, 4–9), and mean subjective IKDC score was 88.8 (SD: 9.9). The surgical repair of grade III distal MCL injuries delivered satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. Future comparative studies with larger patient samples are needed.

scholarly journals Short-term serial assessment of electronic patient-reported outcome for depression and anxiety in breast Cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeeyeon Lee ◽  
Jin Hyang Jung ◽  
Wan Wook Kim ◽  
Byeongju Kang ◽  
Jungmin Woo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Health

Abstract Purpose The incidence of depression and anxiety is higher in patients with breast cancer than in the general population. We evaluated the degree of depression and anxiety and investigated the changes in patients with breast cancer during the treatment period and short-term follow-up period. Methods Overall, 137 patients with breast cancer were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The scales were developed as a web-based electronic patient-reported outcome measure, and serial results were assessed before the operation, after the operation, in the post-treatment period, and in the 6-month follow-up period after surgery. Results The degree of depression and anxiety increased during treatment and decreased at 6-month follow-up, even if there were no statistical differences among the four periods (PHQ-9: p = 0.128; GAD-7: p = 0.786). However, daily fatigue (PHQ-9 Q4) and insomnia (PHQ-9 Q3) were the most serious problems encountered during treatment and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. In the GAD-7, worrying too much (Q3) consistently showed the highest scores during the treatment and follow-up periods. Of the patients, 7 (5.11%) and 11 (8.03%) patients had a worsened state of depression and anxiety, respectively, after treatment compared with before treatment. Conclusion Most factors associated with depression and anxiety improved after treatment. However, factors such as insomnia and worrying too much still disturbed patients with breast cancer, even at 6-month follow-up. Therefore, serial assessment of depression and anxiety is necessary for such patients.

scholarly journals Three-month and six-month outcomes of patients with COVID-19 associated hyperinflammation treated with short-term immunosuppressive therapy: follow-up of the CHIC study

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e001906
Author(s):  
Marlou THF Janssen ◽  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Rémy LM Mostard ◽  
Cesar Magro-Checa ◽  
Robert BM Landewé
Keyword(s):  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Normal Population ◽  
Immunosuppressive Treatment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Function Tests ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesTo prospectively investigate differences in medium-term patient-reported outcome measures and objective functional outcome measures, between patients receiving and those not receiving intensive short-term immunosuppressive therapy for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-associated hyperinflammation.MethodsPatients previously included in the COVID-19 High-intensity Immunosuppression in Cytokine storm syndrome (CHIC) study who received immunosuppressive treatment versus standard of care for COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation were invited for follow-up at 3 and 6 months after hospitalisation. At both visits, patients were assessed by a pulmonologist, completed quality of life (QoL) questionnaires and performed pulmonary and exercise function tests. At 3 months, patients additionally completed questionnaires on dyspnoea, anxiety, depression and trauma. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving and those not receiving intensive short-term immunosuppressive therapy for COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation.Results131 (66.5%) patients survived hospitalisation due to COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation and 118 (90.1%) were included. QoL questionnaires, pulmonary- and exercise function tests showed improvement between 3 and 6 months after discharge, which was similar in both groups. Assessed patients reached levels that were close to levels predicted from the normal population. In contrast, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was disturbed in both groups: 69.6% predicted (SD 16.2) and 73.5% predicted (SD 16.5) in control group and treated group, respectively.ConclusionsNo differences in medium-term outcomes are demonstrated in survivors of COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation treated or not treated with methylprednisolone with or without tocilizumab during the acute phase. Short-term benefits of this therapy, as showed in the baseline CHIC study analysis, are thus not hampered by medium-term adverse events.

scholarly journals Durability of Smoking Cessation for Elective Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0039
Author(s):  
Danica H. Smith ◽  
Michael F. McTague ◽  
Michael J. Weaver ◽  
Jeremy T. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Impaired Wound Healing ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Category: General Health Introduction/Purpose: Smoking tobacco is a risk factor for impaired wound healing, infection, delayed fracture healing, and prolonged hospital stay. Smoking cessation prior to surgery has shown a 40% relative risk reduction in total perioperative complications. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of preoperative smoking cessation on long-term smoking habits in patients undergoing elective lower extremity orthopaedic surgery. The secondary outcome is patient-reported effectiveness of smoking cessation method. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed by identifying all patients who were smokers that were required to quit and subsequently had a normal nicotine/cotinine serum test prior to lower extremity orthopaedic surgery. Attempts were made to contact all patients and administer a survey inquiring about demographics, medical history, smoking history, smoking cessation process, and current smoking status. Results: Of 36 eligible patients, 23 completed the survey. Eleven patients identified as current non-smokers (48%) at the time of survey follow-up (mean follow-up 55 months with a range of 12 to 88 months). Of these 11, 82% said they were very likely to continue to refrain from smoking. Twelve patients identified as current smokers at the time of survey, over half of whom ceased smoking for at least three months perioperatively. The reasons for resuming smoking were “stress” (45%), ”falling back into the habit” (37%), and due to “friends who smoke” (18%). The majority of smoking patients (92%) decreased the number of cigarettes they smoked regularly. The most effective smoking cessation techniques were ”cold turkey”, “non-nicotine medication”, and ”trans-dermal nicotine patches”. Conclusion: Elective surgery offers a unique opportunity for smoking cessation. Of 23 patients required to quit smoking prior to surgery, 48% maintained smoking cessation at least one year postoperatively. Of the 12 patients who relapsed, 55% stated that they did not resume smoking until at least three months postoperatively, suggesting that this particular period may be an important time for intensified smoking cessation counseling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document