scholarly journals Performance in Collegiate-Level Baseball Players After Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712091301
Author(s):  
Hasani W. Swindell ◽  
David P. Trofa ◽  
Jamie Confino ◽  
Julian J. Sonnenfeld ◽  
Frank J. Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Collegiate Athletes ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Career Longevity ◽  
Elbow Injury ◽  
Collegiate Baseball ◽  
Collegiate Level

Background: The increase in ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) elbow reconstructions over the past 20 years has affected younger athletes more than any other age group. Although return to play and postoperative performance have been extensively studied in professional baseball players, outcomes in collegiate baseball players are less known. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to characterize return to play and changes in performance after UCL reconstruction (UCLR) in collegiate baseball players. We hypothesized that collegiate baseball players would have similar return-to-play rates compared with professional athletes and no significant differences in performance compared with matched controls. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Collegiate athletes undergoing UCLR by a single surgeon were identified. Postoperatively, individual collegiate career paths were analyzed through use of publicly available data from team websites, injury reports, and press releases. Data obtained included time to return to competition, number of collegiate seasons played after surgery, total games started and played, seasonal wins, losses, saves, innings played, hits, earned run average (ERA), home runs, shutouts, strikeouts, walks, and walks plus hit per inning pitched (WHIP). The UCLR group was compared with a matched control group of collegiate pitchers without elbow injury. Results: Of the 58 collegiate baseball players analyzed (mean ± SD age, 19.95 ± 1.19 years), 84.5% returned to play at the collegiate level. Players returned to competition at 16.98 ± 6.16 months postoperatively and competed for 1.60 ± 0.84 seasons postoperatively. In terms of career longevity, 81.0% of collegiate pitchers either completed their collegiate eligibility or remained on active rosters, and 2 players (4.1%) ultimately played at the professional level after UCLR. Compared with a matched cohort, the UCLR group had no significant differences in collegiate pitching performance statistics after surgery. Conclusion: College baseball players returned to play at a rate comparable with the rate published in prior literature on professional pitchers and often completed their collegiate playing eligibility postoperatively. Compared with controls, the UCLR group had no statistically significant differences in pitching performance postoperatively. Further studies are needed to determine the exact reasons why college players retire despite having endured extensive surgical and postoperative rehabilitation processes related to UCLR. Younger populations are experiencing elbow injuries at an increasing rate secondary to increased workloads at the amateur level. As these athletes matriculate into the collegiate ranks, they are at continued risk of sustaining UCL injury, and little explicit information is available on their prospects of return to play and career longevity after UCLR.

Shoulder Range of Motion Deficits in Baseball Players With an Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2597-2603 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Craig Garrison ◽  
Mollie A. Cole ◽  
John E. Conway ◽  
Michael J. Macko ◽  
Charles Thigpen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Elbow Extension ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Elbow Injury ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Range

Background: Shoulder range of motion (ROM) deficits are associated with elbow injury in baseball players. Purpose: To compare the ROM characteristics of baseball players with a diagnosed ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tear with those of a group of age-, activity-, and position-matched healthy controls. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Sixty male competitive high school and collegiate baseball players participated. Thirty athletes (age [mean ± standard deviation], 18.20 ± 1.56 years) with a diagnosed UCL tear were compared with 30 (age, 18.57 ± 0.86 years) age-, activity-, and position-matched players without a UCL injury. Of the 60 participants, there were 44 pitchers, 4 catchers, 5 infielders, and 7 outfielders. Participants were measured for shoulder internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), and horizontal adduction (HA) at 90° of shoulder elevation. Participants were also measured for elbow extension in a seated position. Group comparisons were made between participants with and without a UCL injury using independent t tests with an α level set at P < .05. All measurements were taken bilaterally, and the differences (involved to uninvolved) were used to calculate means for all variables, including glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), total rotational motion (TRM), HA, and elbow extension. Results: Baseball players with a UCL tear (UCLInj) exhibited significantly greater deficits in TRM compared with the control group of healthy baseball players (NUCLInj) (UCLInj = −6.67° ± 11.82°, NUCLInj = 0.93° ± 9.91°; P = .009). No group differences were present for GIRD (UCLInj = −12.53° ± 5.98°, NUCLInj = −13.63° ± 5.90°; P = .476), HA (UCLInj = −3.00° ± 5.01°, NUCLInj = −3.23° ± 5.15°; P = .860), or elbow extension (UCLInj = −2.63° ± 7.86°, NUCLInj = −1.17° ± 2.76°; P = .339). Pitchers with a UCL tear had significantly greater deficits in TRM (UCLInjPitch = −6.96° ± 11.20°, NUCLInjPitch = 1.29° ± 8.33°; P = .0087) and dominant shoulder ER (UCLInjPitch = 112.04° ± 14.35°, NUCLInjPitch = 121.85° ± 9.46°; P = .011) than pitchers without a UCL tear. Conclusion: A deficit in TRM is associated with a UCL tear in baseball players. Although GIRD may be prevalent in throwers, it may not be associated with a UCL injury. When examining ROM in baseball players, it is important to assess both TRM and GIRD.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of the Nonoperative Treatment of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Professional Baseball Players with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Douglas McQueen ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Aakash Chauhan ◽  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
Hollis G. Potter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Time ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Minor League Baseball ◽  
Minor League

Objectives: In the setting of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury, surgical reconstruction of the UCL is not always selected, as it leads to a prolonged recovery time and return to play rates between 67-95%. To date, there is limited data on outcomes following nonoperative treatment in this population. Orthobiologics, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have recently been used as an adjunct therapy for standard nonoperative treatment including rest and physical therapy for UCL injuries. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of PRP injections in professional baseball players with UCL injuries reduces recovery time, lowers the likelihood of surgery, and increases the return to play rate compared to traditional nonoperative treatment. Methods: The Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS) database was searched from 2011-2015 for Major and Minor league baseball players with Grade I, II or III UCL injuries. Standard demographic, injury, and return to play data was obtained for all players. MRI’s for 353 athletes were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist and graded accordingly. Outcomes were compared between players who received PRP injections in addition to traditional nonoperative treatment (PRP group) and players who received traditional nonoperative treatment alone (No PRP group). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s T-test and Chi-square for parametric data. Kaplan Meier’s analysis was used for estimating longevity of the treatment. Results: A total of 544 Major and Minor League Baseball players with UCL tears underwent an initial course of nonoperative treatment (active rest & rehabilitation) for their injury between 2011-2015. Of these, 133 underwent PRP injections plus rehab and 411 underwent rehab alone. There was a significantly higher proportion of Major League Baseball players in the PRP group compared to the No PRP group (25.6% vs 9.0%, P<0.001). There was no difference between the two cohorts in regard to the grade of UCL tear (Figure 1). The players in the PRP group had a significantly longer time before returning to a throwing program compared to the No PRP group (64 days vs 51 days, P<0.001). The mean time from injury date to PRP injection was 14.5 days, which may explain the difference in time to return to throwing. The return to play rate in a live game without surgery was significantly lower in the PRP group compared to the No PRP group (46% vs 57%, P=0.03). There was no difference in the proportion of athletes requiring UCL reconstruction (58% vs 51%) or the time to surgery (154 days vs 178 days) between the two groups. Kaplan Meier survivor analysis showed no difference between the PRP and No PRP groups with regard to longevity of the native UCL (Figure 2). Conclusion: Among Major and Minor League Baseball players who were treated nonoperatively for a UCL injury between 2011-2015, 24% underwent PRP injections prior to rehab. Compared to traditional nonoperative rehab alone program, players who received PRP injections experienced a significantly longer time before returning to throwing, which may be in part due to the delay between the injury date and PRP injection. PRP injections did not appear to have a significant effect on the likelihood of surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes Based on Graft Type and Tunnel Configuration for Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Pitchers

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1103-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy B. Griffith ◽  
Christopher S. Ahmad ◽  
Prakash Gorroochurn ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Michael G. Ciccotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Palmaris Longus ◽  
Elbow Injuries ◽  
Elbow Surgery ◽  
Baseball Pitchers

Background: Professional baseball pitchers are at high risk for tears of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow, often requiring surgical reconstruction. Despite acceptable published return-to-play outcomes, multiple techniques and graft types have been described. Purpose: This study compares UCL reconstruction (UCLR) outcomes based on tunnel configuration and graft type. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After approval from our institutional review board and Major League Baseball (MLB), 566 professional baseball pitchers who underwent UCLR between 2010 and 2014 were identified and included. The following patient characteristics were analyzed: age, pitching role (starter vs reliever), level of play (MLB vs Minor League Baseball [MiLB]), and throwing side dominance. Surgical factors analyzed included reconstruction technique, graft type, and concomitant procedures. Primary outcome measures consisted of the ability to return to play at any level (RTP), ability to return to the same level of play (RSL), time to return, subsequent elbow injuries, and need for subsequent or revision elbow surgery. The effects of patient and surgical factors on outcomes were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression modeling. Results: The RTP rate was 79.9%, and the RSL rate was 71.2%. Grafts used to reconstruct the UCL included the palmaris longus autograft (n = 361, 63.7%), the gracilis autograft (n = 135, 23.8%), and other grafts (n = 70, 12.5%). Surgical techniques utilized were the docking technique (n = 171, 30.2%), the modified Jobe technique (n = 290, 51.2%), and other techniques (n = 105, 18.6%). There were no significant differences in the time to RTP or RSL based on reconstruction technique or graft type. RTP rates were similar for the docking versus modified Jobe technique (80.1% vs 82.4%, respectively; P = .537) and for the 2 primary graft types (83.1% for palmaris longus vs 80.7% for gracilis; P = .596). The rate of subsequent elbow surgery was 10.5% for the docking technique versus 14.8% for the modified Jobe technique ( P = .203), and the rate of revision UCLR was 2.9% versus 6.2% for the docking versus modified Jobe technique, respectively ( P = .128). Significant trends toward an increasing use of the palmaris longus autograft ( P = .023) and the docking technique ( P = .006) were observed. MLB pitchers were more likely than MiLB pitchers to RTP ( P < .001) and RSL ( P < .001), but they required a longer time to return (mean difference, 35 days; P = .039) and had a higher likelihood of subsequent elbow (odds ratio [OR], 3.58 [95% CI, 2.06-6.23]; P < .001) and forearm injuries (OR, 5.70 [95% CI, 1.99-16.30]; P = .004) but not subsequent elbow surgery. No specific variables correlated with the rates of subsequent elbow surgery or revision UCLR in the multivariate analysis. The use of concomitant ulnar nerve transposition did not affect outcomes. Conclusion: Surgical outcomes in professional baseball players are not significantly influenced by UCLR technique or graft type. There was a high rate (46.3%) of subsequent throwing elbow injuries. MLB pitchers were more likely to RTP and RSL, but they had a higher frequency of subsequent elbow and forearm injuries than MiLB pitchers. Both the docking technique and the palmaris longus autograft are increasing in popularity among surgeons treating professional baseball players.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes Based on Graft Type and Tunnel Configuration for Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Pitchers

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0008
Author(s):  
Timothy B. Griffith ◽  
Christopher S. Ahmad ◽  
Michael G. Ciccotti ◽  
John D’Angelo ◽  
Joshua S. Dines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Elbow Surgery ◽  
Baseball Pitchers ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction

Objectives: Professional baseball pitchers are at high risk for tears of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow, often requiring subsequent surgical reconstruction. Despite acceptable published return to play outcomes, multiple techniques and graft types have been described. There is a paucity of clinical data in the current literature comparing UCL reconstruction surgical technique and graft type. Even less is known about the risks for subsequent injury, surgery, or revision UCL reconstruction. Accordingly, this study compares UCL reconstruction outcomes based on tunnel configuration and graft type. Methods: Following approval from our institutional review board and Major League Baseball (MLB), 566 professional baseball pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2010 and 2014 were identified and included. The following patient demographics were analyzed: age, pitching role (starter vs. reliever), level of play (MLB vs. Minor League Baseball [MiLB]), and throwing side dominance. Surgical factors analyzed included reconstruction technique (Docking vs. Modified Jobe), graft type (palmaris longus autograft vs. gracilis autograft), and concomitant procedures. Primary outcome measures consisted of: the ability to return to play at any level (RTP), to return to the same level of play (RSL), the time to return, subsequent elbow injuries, and the need for subsequent or revision elbow surgery. The impact of the patient and surgical factors on outcomes were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression modeling. Results: The overall RTP was 79.9% and RSL was 71.2%. There were no significant differences in the time to RTP or RSL based on reconstruction technique or graft type. RTP rates were similar for the Docking vs. Modified Jobe techniques (80.1% vs. 82.4%; p=0.537) and for the two primary graft types (83.1% for palmaris vs. 80.7% for gracilis; p=0.596). The risk of subsequent elbow surgery was 10.5% for the Docking Technique vs. 14.8% for the Modified Jobe (p=0.203); and the risk for subsequent UCL revision reconstruction surgery was 2.9% vs. 6.2% for the Docking vs. Modified Jobe Techniques, respectively (p=0.128). Significant trends towards an increasing use of palmaris autograft (p=0.023) and the docking technique (p=0.006) were observed. MLB pitchers were more likely than MiLB pitchers to RTP (p<0.001) and to RSL (p<0.001), but they required a longer time to return (mean difference 35 days; p=0.039), had a higher likelihood of subsequent elbow (OR 3.58; 95% CI 2.055 to 6.231; p<0.001) and forearm injuries (OR 5.695; 95% CI 1.99 to 16.302; p=0.004), but not subsequent elbow surgery. No specific variables were noted to be predictive of subsequent elbow or revision surgery in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Surgical outcomes in professional baseball players are not significantly influenced by ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique or graft type usage. Major League players are more likely to RTP and RSL, but they have a higher frequency of subsequent elbow and forearm injuries. Both the Docking Technique and palmaris autograft are increasing in popularity amongst surgeons treating professional baseball players.

scholarly journals Is Workload Associated with Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears in Professional Baseball Players? An Analysis of Days of Rest, Innings Pitched and Batters Faced (126)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0026
Author(s):  
Peter Chalmers ◽  
Kathryn Mcelheny ◽  
John Dangelo ◽  
Kevin Ma ◽  
Dana Rowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major League Baseball ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Elbow Injuries ◽  
Paired Analysis

Objectives: To determine if workload; as measured by number of days rest between outings, innings pitched, batters faced, and being a starting pitcher; associates with risk for sustaining a subsequent UCL tear in professional baseball players. Methods: All professional baseball pitchers who sustained a UCL tear between 2011-2017 were identified using the major league baseball (MLB) Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS). A separate player usage was used to determine workload . We then compared these variables between player-games 2, 6, 12, and >12 weeks prior to a documented UCL tear and player games from a non-UCL tear control group. In a paired analysis, we compared the acute workload (2, 6, 12 weeks) prior to injury and the injured player’s workload >12 weeks prior to injury. Results: There were 2,204 elbow injuries within MLB, 369 of which were unique UCL tears in pitchers. In all time periods, player-games with more days rest, more innings pitched, and more batters faced associated with a subsequent UCL tear. Players who pitched 4 of more innings per outing had a 1.78-fold increase in percent of players with a subsequent UCL tear as compared to players with one inning pitched. Being a starting pitcher carried a relative risk of 1.51 (p<0.001) of subsequent UCL injury. In a paired analysis there were significantly more innings pitched and batters faced in the player-games 2 weeks prior to UCL injury than in the player-games >12 weeks prior to UCL injury (p=0.028 and p=0.017). Conclusions: Being a starting pitcher, pitching more innings per game, and facing more batters per game increased the risk of a UCL tear. An increase in workload in the 2 weeks prior to injury over that player’s baseline also significantly increased the risk for injury.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Non-Operatively Treated Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Professional Baseball Players by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tear Grade and Location

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0031
Author(s):  
Aakash Chauhan ◽  
Peter Nissen Chalmers ◽  
Peter Douglas McQueen ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Hollis G. Potter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Professional Baseball ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Survivorship Analysis ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Injury Grade ◽  
Relationship Of

Objectives: Evaluate the relationship of 1) MRI tear grade and 2) injury location with outcomes for non-operatively treated elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in professional baseball players. Methods: 544 professional baseball players were identified from the MLB Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS) that were treated non-operatively for their UCL injuries from 2011-2015. Of these players, 237 MRI’s were directly available for review by an independent, expert musculoskeletal radiologist who evaluated the grade (Grade I -edema, II-partial tear, III-complete tear) and location of the tears (humeral, ulnar, both-sided). Player demographics and outcomes including return to throwing (RTT), return to play (RTP), failed non-operative treatment leading to UCL reconstruction (UCLR), and Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of the native UCL to re-injury or surgery based on MRI grade and tear location was measured. A multivariate analysis adjusting for age, MRI grade, tear location, and level of play (Major = MLB; Minor = MiLB) was also performed. Results: The average age of all players was 22.5 years, 90% played at the MiLB level, and 84% were pitchers. The radiologist’s MRI injury grade was distributed as follows: Grade I (36%), Grade II (49%), and Grade III (15%) injuries. The tear locations were distributed as follows: humeral (65%), ulnar (13%), and both-sided (22%). There were no statistically significant differences in RTT, RTP, and UCLR by grade or tear location. However, objectively, ulnar-sided tears had the lowest RTT (81%) and RTP (42%). The ulnar (58%) and both-sided (60%) tears also had an objectively higher rate of UCLR compared to humeral sided tears (51%, p=0.441). The survivorship analysis showed a consistent decline over time with increasing MRI grade. By location, humeral tears had the highest survivorship (1 yr = 51%; 2 yr = 44%). However, there was no statistically significant differences in survivorship for either grade or location. Multivariate analysis measured the likelihood of not returning to play as 3 times higher [95% CI: 1-9.3; p=0.044] for older players (>25) compared to younger players. The likelihood of having re-injury or UCLR after non-operative treatment failed was almost 6 times higher [95% CI: 1.5-21.7; p=0.012] for MLB players as opposed to MiLB players. MRI grade and tear location were not significantly predictive of returning to play, re-injury, or surgery. Conclusion: This is the largest study to evaluate the prognostic relationship of MRI injury grade and tear location with outcomes for non-operatively treated elbow UCL tears in professional baseball players. Lower MRI grade and humeral location were objectively associated with a higher RTT, higher RTP, lower UCLR, and higher survival compared to higher grade, and ulnar or both-sided tears. Older age (>25) had a significantly higher likelihood of not returning to play after non-operative treatment. Competing at the MLB level had a higher likelihood of re-injury or having UCLR. Based on this study, non-operative treatment of UCL injuries will likely be more successful in younger players, lower grade tears, and humeral-sided injuries.

Baseball Players With an Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear Display Increased Nondominant Arm Humeral Torsion Compared With Healthy Baseball Players

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey J. Meyer ◽  
J. Craig Garrison ◽  
John E. Conway
Keyword(s):  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Protective Mechanism ◽  
Shoulder Injuries ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Elbow Injury ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Humeral Torsion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Previous work has suggested that an increase in the amount of developmentally acquired, dominant arm humeral retrotorsion (D HRT) in the thrower’s shoulder may be a potentially protective mechanism. Although the relationship between HRT and shoulder injuries has been reported, the relationship between HRT and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears in baseball players is not known. Purpose: To determine whether D HRT and nondominant arm HRT (ND HRT) measurements in baseball players with a UCL tear differ statistically from a matched healthy cohort. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: D HRT and ND HRT were measured in 112 male competitive high school and collegiate baseball players seen over an 18-month period from 2013 to 2015. A total of 56 participants with a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging–confirmed diagnosis of a throwing-arm UCL tear (UCLInj group) were compared with 56 healthy baseball players with no history of an elbow injury who were matched for age, experience, and position (NUCLInj group). The mean ages in the UCLInj and NUCLInj groups were 17.9 ± 2.2 and 17.6 ± 2.8 years, respectively. Using a previously validated ultrasound method, D HRT and ND HRT were measured in the supine position, and the HRT side-to-side difference (D HRT – ND HRT) was calculated. A 1-way multivariate analysis of variance was used to determine the mean statistical differences between groups ( P < .05). Results: Baseball players with a UCL tear displayed significantly more humeral torsion (ie, less retrotorsion) in their nondominant arm compared with healthy baseball players (UCLInj = 33.27° ± 10.27°, NUCLInj = 27.82° ± 10.88°; P = .007). Baseball players with a UCL tear did not display any differences in D HRT compared with healthy baseball players (UCLInj = 18.67° ± 9.41°, NUCLInj = 17.09° ± 9.92°; P = .391). Significant side-to-side differences in HRT existed between groups (UCLInj = −14.60° ± 6.72°, NUCLInj = −10.72° ± 6.88°; P = .003). Conclusion: There was a significant increase in mean nondominant arm humeral torsion (ie, less retrotorsion) in the UCL tear group, but there was no significant difference in the mean D HRT between the injured and uninjured groups. A greater HRT side-to-side difference was displayed in the UCL tear group. The extent to which a thrower has developmentally acquired both D HRT and ND HRT may affect elbow UCL tear risk. Furthermore, it is possible that the extent of genetically predisposed ND HRT may influence the throwing-related increase in D HRT.

scholarly journals Incidence Of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery In Collegiate Baseball Players

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0031
Author(s):  
Marcus A. Rothermich ◽  
Stan A. Conte ◽  
Glenn S. Fleisig ◽  
E. Lyle Cain ◽  
Jeffrey R. Dugas
Keyword(s):  
Ncaa Division I ◽  
National Collegiate Athletic Association ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Division I ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Baseball Players ◽  
Collegiate Baseball ◽  
Internal Brace ◽  
Surgical Injuries

Objectives: Recent studies in the literature have highlighted the progressive increase in the incidence of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries to the elbow in baseball players of all levels. However, knowledge of the incidence and other epidemiological factors regarding UCL injuries, specifically in college baseball players, is currently lacking. In 2016, we launched a prospective, multi-year study to evaluate the incidence of UCL injuries requiring surgery in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I baseball programs. Methods: We invited 157 Division I collegiate baseball programs after the 2017 season, and 155 agreed to participate in the study. After the 2018 season, all 297 programs were invited and 294 participated. At the conclusion of the 2017 and 2018 collegiate baseball seasons, the athletic trainer for each program entered anonymous, detailed information on injured players through an electronic survey into a secured database. Results: We obtained a 100% completion rate in the first two years of this ongoing study (155/155 respondents in the first year, 294/294 in the second year). Of the 5,364 collegiate baseball players tracked in Year 1 (2016-2017), 134 underwent surgery for an injured UCL, resulting in a team surgery rate of 0.86 per program. In Year 2 (2017-2018), there were 230 surgeries reported from 10,019 players tracked, resulting in a team surgery rate of 0.78 per program. A majority of schools experienced at least one surgery during both years (56.8% in Year 1, 50.7% in Year 2). Pitchers experience a vast majority of the surgical injuries (85.8% in Year 1, 84.3% in Year 2). Underclassmen made up 65.7% of surgeries in Year 1, which fell slightly to 56.1% in Year 2. Nearly half of the surgeries occurred during an ongoing baseball season in Year 1 (48.5%), but this fell in Year 2 to 41.3%. In both years, a non-significant majority of players were from warm-weather states (65.4% in Year 1, 52.9% in Year 2). Revision surgical rates remained nearly constant with 3.0% revision surgeries in Year 1 compared with 2.6% revisions in Year 2. Interestingly, the percentage of UCL repairs with internal brace augmentation rose from 9.5% in Year 1 to 19.9% of all procedures in Year 2. Conclusion: The incidence of UCL surgeries in NCAA Division I collegiate baseball players represents substantial morbidity to this young athletic population. This multi-year prospective study has been established to assess the incidence of surgical UCL injuries in collegiate baseball. Also, importantly, with multiple years of data we will identify trends in the demographics of players undergoing surgery and in surgical details over time. Awareness of these factors should be considered in injury prevention programs in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document