scholarly journals Rate of Tibial Tunnel Malposition Is Not Changed by Drilling Entirely Within the Stump of Preserved Remnants During ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparative 3D-CT Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712110373
Author(s):  
Vitor Barion C. de Padua ◽  
Adnan Saithna ◽  
Eduardo Federighi B. Chagas ◽  
Tereza Lais M. Zutin ◽  
Lucas Fernandes Piazzalunga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
3D Ct ◽  
Remnant Preservation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tunnel Positions ◽  
Tunnel Positioning

Background: Remnant preservation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is controversial, and it is unclear whether the stump aids or obscures tibial tunnel positioning. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to determine whether the rate of tibial tunnel malposition is influenced by remnant preservation. The hypothesis was that using a remnant-preserving technique to drill entirely within the tibial stump would result in a significant reduction in tibial tunnel malposition as determined by postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients undergoing ACLR between October 2018 and December 2019 underwent surgery with a remnant-preserving technique (RP group) if they had a large stump present (>50% of the native ACL length) or if there was no remnant or if it was <50% of the native length of the ACL, they underwent remnant ablation (RA group) and use of standard landmarks for tunnel positioning. The postoperative tunnel location was reported as a percentage of the overall anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions of the tibia on axial 3D-CT. The tunnel was classified as anatomically placed if the center lay between 30% and 55% of the AP length and between 40% and 51% of the ML length. Results: Overall, 52 patients were included in the study (26 in each group). The mean tunnel positions were 36.8% ± 5.5% AP and 46.7% ± 2.9% ML in the RP group and 35.6% ± 4.8% AP and 47.3% ± 2.3% ML in the RA group. There were no significant differences in the mean AP ( P = .134) and ML ( P = .098) tunnel positions between the groups. Inter- and intraobserver reliability varied between fair to excellent and good to excellent, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of malposition between groups (RP group, 7.7%; RA group, 11.5%; P ≥ .999). Conclusion: Drilling entirely within the ACL tibial stump using a remnant-preserving reconstruction technique did not significantly change the rate of tunnel malposition when compared with stump ablation and utilization of standard landmarks.

Long-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Either Synthetics With Remnant Preservation or Hamstring Autografts: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 2739-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianwu Chen ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Jiwu Chen ◽  
Yinghui Hua ◽  
Shiyi Chen
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Thigh Muscle ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Remnant Preservation ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hop Test ◽  
The Mean

Background: The optimal graft choice of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. Purpose: To compare the outcomes, especially the long-term cumulative failure rate, of ACL reconstruction using either synthetics with remnant preservation or hamstring autografts (4-strand semitendinosus and gracilis tendons). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 133 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (synthetics: n = 43; hamstring autografts: n = 90) between July 2004 and December 2007 were included. Questionnaires (Tegner activity scale, Lysholm knee scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective form) were completed preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was additionally applied at 10 years’ follow-up. The physical examination was based on the 2000 IKDC form. The manual maximum side-to-side difference (KT-1000 arthrometer), single-hop test, thigh muscle atrophy, and joint degeneration (Kellgren and Lawrence classification) were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test (Mantel-Cox, 95% CI) were used to compare graft survivorship. Results: Ten years postoperatively, 111 patients were available, with 38 (88.4%) patients (mean age, 27.6 ± 9.3 years; 28 men) with synthetics and 73 (81.1%) patients (mean age, 28.6 ± 8.8 years; 64 men) with hamstring autografts. Among them, 104 patients (synthetics: n = 35 [81.4%]; hamstring autografts: n = 69 [76.7%]) completed subjective evaluations, and 89 patients (synthetics: n = 30 [69.8%]; hamstring autografts: n = 59 [65.6%]) completed objective evaluations. For hamstring autografts and synthetics, the cumulative failure rates were 8.2% and 7.9%, respectively, and the log-rank test demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves ( P = .910). At 6 months postoperatively, for hamstring autografts and synthetics, the mean Lysholm score was 83.0 ± 7.8 and 88.1 ± 7.5, respectively ( P < .001); the mean IKDC score was 83.8 ± 7.8 and 86.9 ± 4.5, respectively ( P = .036); and the mean Tegner score was 3.7 ± 1.1 and 5.0 ± 1.5, respectively ( P < .001). At 1 year postoperatively, the mean Tegner score was 5.5 ± 1.9 and 6.5 ± 2.0, respectively ( P = .011). No statistically significant difference was observed on other subjective evaluation findings, physical examination findings (overall IKDC grade A: 45.8% of hamstring autografts, 50.0% of synthetics), side-to-side difference (1.5 ± 1.5 mm for synthetics, 2.4 ± 2.1 mm for hamstring autografts), single-hop test findings (grade A: 84.7% of hamstring autografts, 93.3% of synthetics), grade A/B thigh muscle atrophy (88.1% of hamstring autografts, 93.3% of synthetics), ipsilateral radiographic osteoarthritis (55.9% of hamstring autografts, 50.0% of synthetics), and graft survivorship. Conclusion: In this prospective cohort study, primary ACL reconstruction using either synthetics with remnant preservation or hamstring autografts showed satisfactory outcomes, especially the long-term cumulative failure rate, at 10 years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes suggested that symptom relief and restoration of function might occur earlier in those with synthetics.

Evaluation of Tibial Tunnel Location with the Femoral Tunnel Created Behind the Resident's Ridge in Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuneari Takahashi ◽  
Tomohiro Saito ◽  
Tatsuya Kubo ◽  
Ko Hirata ◽  
Hideaki Sawamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Femoral Bone ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tunnel Positions ◽  
Tunnel Angle ◽  
Coronal View

AbstractFew studies have determined whether a femoral bone tunnel could be created behind the resident's ridge by using a transtibial (TT) technique-single bundle (SB)-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to clarify (1) whether it is possible to create a femoral bone tunnel behind the resident's ridge by using the TT technique with SB ACL reconstruction, (2) to define the mean tibial and femoral tunnel angles during anatomic SB ACL reconstruction, and (3) to clarify the tibial tunnel inlet location when the femoral tunnel is created behind resident's ridge. Arthroscopic TT-SB ACL reconstruction was performed on 36 patients with ACL injuries. The point where 2.4-mm guide pin was inserted was confirmed, via anteromedial portal, to consider a location behind the resident's ridge. Then, an 8-mm diameter femoral tunnel with a 4.5-mm socket was created. Tunnel positions were evaluated by using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) 1 week postoperatively. Quadrant method and the resident's ridge on 3D-CT were evaluated to determine whether femoral tunnel position was anatomical. Radiological evaluations of tunnel positions yielded mean ( ±  standard deviation) X- and Y-axis values for the tunnel centers: femoral tunnel, 25.2% ± 5.1% and 41.6% ± 10.2%; tibial tunnel, 49.2% ± 3.5%, and 31.5% ± 7.7%. The bone tunnels were anatomically positioned in all cases. The femoral tunnel angle relative to femoral axis was 29.4 ± 5.5 degrees in the coronal view and 43.5 ± 8.0 degrees in the sagittal view. The tibial tunnel angle relative to tibial axis was 25.5 ± 5.3 degrees in the coronal view and 52.3 ± 4.6 degrees in the sagittal view. The created tibial bone tunnel inlet had an average distance of 13.4 ± 2.7 mm from the medial tibial joint line and 9.7 ± 1.7 mm medial from the axis of the tibia. Femoral bone tunnel could be created behind the resident's ridge with TT-SB ACL reconstruction. The tibial bone tunnel inlet averaged 13.4 mm from the medial tibial joint line and 9.7 mm medial from the tibia axis.

The Effect of Remnant Preservation on Tibial Tunnel Enlargement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Polyethylene Terephthalate Artificial Ligament in a Large Animal Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1094-1101
Author(s):  
Jiangyu Cai ◽  
Fang Wan ◽  
Chengchong Ai ◽  
Wenhe Jin ◽  
Dandan Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Tunnel Enlargement ◽  
Artificial Ligament ◽  
Remnant Preservation ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractAn enlarged bone tunnel may affect the graft–bone integration and pose a problem for revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of remnant preservation on tibial tunnel enlargement in ACL reconstruction with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) artificial ligament. Twenty-four skeletally mature male beagles underwent ACL reconstruction with PET artificial ligament for both knees. One knee was reconstructed with remnant preservation using sleeve technique (remnant group), while the contralateral was reconstructed without remnant preservation (control group). The animals were sacrificed at 1 day, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after surgery for further evaluation including macroscopic observation, microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), histological assessment, and biomechanical testing. The remnant group had better synovial coverage than the control group at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. The micro-CT analysis showed the tibial tunnel area (TTA) of the remnant group was significantly smaller and the bone volume/total volume fraction (BV/TV) value was higher than those of the control group at 6 and 12 weeks. Moreover, TTA and BV/TV at each time point were divided into three groups according to the different grade of synovial coverage. Significant association was observed between the synovial coverage degree and the TTA and BV/TV values. The histological assessment revealed that the interface width between the graft and host bone in the remnant group was smaller than that in the control group in the tibial tunnels at 6 and 12 weeks. Moreover, the remnant group had better failure load and stiffness than the control group at 12 weeks. The remnant preservation using sleeve technique could effectively promote the synovial coverage of the graft, decrease the risk of tibial tunnel enlargement by sealing the bone tunnel entrance, and enhance the biological environment for graft–bone healing after ACL reconstruction using PET artificial ligament. This technique provides a potential solution for bone tunnel enlargement following artificial ligament surgery for the acute ACL rupture in the clinical practice.

Tear Rates of the Ipsilateral ACL Graft and the Contralateral Native ACL Are Similar following ACL Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Nastassia Ifran ◽  
Ying Ren Mok ◽  
Lingaraj Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Mean Time

AbstractThe aim of the study is to compare the tear rates of ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts and the contralateral native ACL as well as to investigate the correlation of gender, age at time of surgery, and body mass index (BMI) with the occurrence of these injuries. The medical records of 751 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery with follow-up periods of 2 to 7 years were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analyses of ipsilateral ACL grafts and contralateral native ACL were performed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors that were associated with these injuries. The tear rates of the ipsilateral ACL graft and contralateral ACL were 5.86 and 6.66%, respectively with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.998). The mean time of tears of the ipsilateral ACL and contralateral ACL was also similar (p = 0.977) at 2.64 and 2.78 years, respectively after surgery. Both the odds of sustaining an ipsilateral ACL graft and contralateral ACL tear were also significantly decreased by 0.10 (p = 0.003) and 0.14 (p = 0.000), respectively, for every 1-year increase in age at which the reconstruction was performed. However, graft type, gender, and BMI were not associated with an increased risk of these injuries. There was no difference between tear rates of ipsilateral ACL graft and contralateral ACL following ACL reconstruction. Patients who undergo ACL reconstruction at a young age are at an increased risk of both ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture after an ACL reconstruction. Patients who are young and more likely to return to competitive sports should be counselled of the risks and advised to not neglect the rehabilitation of the contralateral knee during the immediate and back to sports period of recovery. This is a Level III, retrospective cohort study.

scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Tunnel Location and Angle during Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0009
Author(s):  
Sang Hak Lee ◽  
Kyung Hk Yoon ◽  
Chan Il Bae
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Tunnel Length ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: Tibial tunnel-independent drilling has attracted increased interest in recent years for anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the geometry and position of the femoral tunnel between the anteromedial portal (AMP) and outside-in (OI) techniques after anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 82 patients undergoing single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts using either the AMP (n=40) or OI (n=42) technique. The locations of the tibial and femoral tunnel apertures were assessed by immediate postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) imaging with OsiriX imaging software. The femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel aperture shape (height/width ratio), femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were also measured. Results: The two techniques did not differ significantly in the femoral tunnel position perpendicular to the Blumensaat line. However, the mean femoral tunnel position parallel to the Blumensaat line was more caudally positioned in the AMP group than in the OI group (P=0.025) The two groups did not differ significantly in tibial tunnel position. The mean femoral tunnel length did not differ between the AMP (36.1±0.33 mm) and OI groups (35.6±0.37 mm; P=0.548) The mean femoral graft angle in the OI group (99.6°±7.1°) was significantly more acute than that of the AMP group (108.9°±10.2°) (p < 0.0001). The mean height/width ratio of the AMP group (1.21±0.20) was significantly more ellipsoidal than that of the OI group (1.07±0.09) (p < 0.0001). Posterior wall breakage was detected in 3 cases (7.5%), all in the AMP group. Conclusions: After single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction, 3D CT showed a significantly shallower femoral tunnel in the AMP group than in the OI group. The AMP group had a more ellipsoidal femoral tunnel with a risk of posterior wall breakage than the OI group. The OI group showed a more acute bending angle of the femoral tunnel than the AMP group. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

Comparison of Acorn and Fluted Reamers on Tibial Tunnel Outer Aperture Dimensions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. Gerrard ◽  
Chris M. Jump ◽  
Paul Sutton ◽  
Charalambos P. Charalambous
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Aperture Width ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Degree Deviation ◽  
Substantial Change

AbstractThe aim of this study was to determine if the type of reamer used in tibial tunnel creation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction influences the dimensions of the tunnel's outer aperture. Tibial tunnels were created in tibial saw bones by reaming over a guidewire using an 8 mm acorn or fluted reamer in an antegrade manner. Reaming was aimed either in line with the guidewire, or with 10-degree inferior/superior deviation in relation to the wire. The shape and size of the outer aperture of the tibial tunnel were compared between the two reamers. When using the acorn reamer, a 10-degree deviation in relation to the guidewire resulted in minimal change in outer aperture length (mean 13.6 vs. 15.6 mm, p = 0.11) and width (11.6 vs. 11.1 mm, p = 0.51). However, when using the fluted reamer, although the aperture width showed no substantial change with reamer/guidewire deviation (11.4 vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.71), the mean length almost doubled (14.7 vs. 28.1 mm, p = 0.002). The use of a fluted reamer when reaming the tibial tunnel creates a distal aperture which is inconsistently sized, larger, and of oblong shape compared with an acorn-shaped reamer. This should be taken in consideration when using a fluted reamer for creating the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction.

Correlation Between Endobutton Loop Length and Tunnel Widening After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam-Hong Choi ◽  
Jong-Seok Oh ◽  
Seok-Hyun Jung ◽  
Brian N. Victoroff
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Tunnel Widening ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tegner Activity Scale

Background: Previous reports have shown that graft fixation with the Endobutton is associated with tunnel widening because it provides distant fixation rather than aperture fixation. Hypothesis: A longer loop of the Endobutton results in greater tunnel widening than a shorter loop. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 171 consecutive patients underwent hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction fixed with the Endobutton. They were followed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. A 15-mm loop was used in 20 patients, a 20-mm loop in 53, a 25-mm loop in 58, and a >30-mm loop in 40. On anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, the measured diameters of the femoral tunnel at 2 years after surgery were compared with the diameter of the reamer used at surgery. The measured diameter of the tibial tunnel at 2 years after surgery was compared with measurements taken on the immediate postoperative day. The center of the tibial tunnel and direction of the ACL graft were also measured. Postoperative knee stability was evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer. Functional evaluations were performed using the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale. All measurements were compared among the 4 groups according to the length of the Endobutton loop. Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) diameter of the femoral tunnel increased by 50.7% ± 23.3% and 37.0% ± 18.8% on AP and lateral radiographs at 2 years after surgery, respectively. The mean ± SD diameter of the tibial tunnel increased by 40.8% ± 19.3% and 46.4% ± 22.6% on AP and lateral radiographs, respectively. No significant difference in tunnel widening was present according to the length of the Endobutton loop. There were no significant differences in the average center of the tibial tunnel or the average angle of the direction of the ACL graft among the 4 groups. There was no significant difference in Lachman test results, postoperative KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale score among the 4 groups. The group with a >30-mm loop showed a significant difference in the pivot-shift test than the other 3 groups ( P = .023). Conclusion: A longer Endobutton loop did not result in greater tunnel widening than a shorter loop. Long fixation distance may not be associated with tunnel widening after hamstring ACL reconstructions.

Remnant preservation does not affect accuracy of tibial tunnel positioning in single-bundle ACL reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Kosy ◽  
Katie Walmsley ◽  
Elizabeth A. Gordon ◽  
Sadie V. Heddon ◽  
Rahul Anaspure ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Remnant Preservation ◽  
Tunnel Positioning

scholarly journals Early Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Full Tibial tunnel technique compared to all-inside technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 3753-3755
Author(s):  
Octav Marius Russu ◽  
Emilian Ciorcila ◽  
Andrei Marian Feier ◽  
Radu Fleaca ◽  
Sandor Gyorgy Zuh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Technique

The all-inside technique for ACL reconstruction uses the semitendinous muscle tendon as a graft, and postoperative pain is slightly reduced. Through the full tibial tunnel technique, better anatomical graft placement is obtained with promising results, yet there are only few scientific articles comparing the two techniques. The main objective is evaluation of results after ACL reconstruction by comparing the clinical results of the two surgical techniques. A prospective study was conducted that included 63 eligible patients according to pre-established criteria. The technique used was randomly indicated to each patient. Demographics and clinical examination results were collected and subsequently stored. The assessment tools used were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with a 6-month follow-up period. The statistical analysis was performed for preoperative follow-up scores, at 3 and 6 months. All patients were operated by the same surgical team under spinal anesthesia with nerve block and tourniquet applied.In regards to IKDC and KOOS scores, the difference between the two interventions was not statistically significant (p = .579 and p = .710). Postoperative pain was slightly reduced in patients in the all-inside\ group but without any statistical significance compared to full-tibial tunnel technique(p = .259). There were no graft ruptures or late postoperative complications. Regarding IKDC, KOOS and VAS evaluating tools, there is no statistically significant difference between the two evaluated methods for ACL reconstruction, all-inside and full tibial tunnel at 3 months and 6 months after surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document